Hi Shire, what an amazing well thought out article and incredible detail. I belong to a freedom group called inalienable university they teach very similar things like your research. The group teaches you how to file a revocation of election with the IRS to eliminate state and federal taxes. You can also get a foreign national ID to eliminate sales tax. They also show you how you can eliminate your mortgage because it’s fraud as the note and the mortgage are separated. Based on Supreme Court rules.
Thank you for the link. I very much appreciate the connection. However... my bedside manner must suck.
i was kicked out in less than 3 days. i was honest i had done most of this before but believed there was more to learn and was looking forward to the group. I was seeking to understand Gianna's use of the word "baggage". Got me booted. She stated in general, that my comment makes her believe i have baggage (looking to learn more from others i guess). i stated that having baggage may be true if she was referring to not being completely in the private quite yet in all things (still have CC cards, bank accounts, etc.)... it is a continuous effort after having spent 45+ years on the other side. i suppose i was too blunt stating what was true and that i had experience in much of the items covered to that point (my deep dive in Freshman classes). It was not negative, simply facts. And, it was actually a compliment to their effort and content. i had not run into that before where it was so well organized.
i do not sleep much, so, it was an immersion and enjoyable for a couple days. Almost all items i already had compiled and put into practice from 4 years of research with some additional case references. i was looking forward to their DMV methods (i have all my own boilerplate revocations and follow-up responses/rebuttals previously created from study). i was also curious about their affidavit form versus my notice/affirmation approach (affirming is a little bit different than affidavit - one is actually legal and based on feudal times and the other is based on what a man does). The curiosity revolves around the State mostly using the word "notice" in their actual procedures and in Common Law a man gives notice of trespass and "commands" and "requires" (order or direct with authority) as a sovereign (they use the negative term "demand" which is to to ask or request with urgency - a request. Which is what a parent says to a child "i demand you to put that down!"). Yet, lawyers act like the word "notice" is a fake word while it is right there in their own procedures. The site did reference the word "require".
i happen to have played the tennis match (what the courts believe is due process through paper process commercial complaints and rebuttals) with lawyers and judges and placed DA's in default (DA's are responsible for the paperwork and proper process in their district). Actually working on some additional default notices and orders. Extremely similar content to what they teach.
So, i was very happy and impressed as they are the first group consistent and correct (as far as i can tell) in all the things i found wrong and lacking with other "freedom" groups ( i will not be rude and call out by name). So, my hat is off to them. Super impressed regardless of the little weight my opinion brings.
Although, i am sad i got booted. The number of mankind that are either self taught or understand the fictitious world is very small. At least without "freedom" movement people going into the off the wall stuff that gets you into being tested for mental stability.
Regardless of the misunderstanding, i would recommend their site for anyone looking to get started and navigate the fictitious world of "persons" and corporate fraud. The Freshman classes are very similar to what is shared in my articles, and their content has very good detail (frankly, i think theirs is dumbed down way better than my high level writing - i have a hard time writing to the eight grade level) of the items i have covered thus far.
Back to being fully accountable and responsible as i, a man. Still no group for i. But, thank you for reading the information as it comes.
I was almost kicked out myself by requesting too many courses at once. she is always very concerned about someone stealing her documentation. I have not entered the DMV course as I’m sure my wife won’t go along with that. We have conveyed our property to private, and have submitted the revocation of election For the IRS. The property process will take years to really work out though as our county treasurer ignores anything I’ve recorded at the county clerks office and any letters I have sent him.
Have you followed Jeff Wiseman? His group follows another path where they have accessed their trust through using the IRS.
I suppose she may have thought i must be annoying as i might have been perceived as going too fast. I noticed how she likes to say she and Scott are "the only ones" and "nowhere else", and "are you paying for the course and other classes"? I've been told i intimidate people and my emotional intelligence is lacking when dealing with facts and stuff. Yet, it is very good when focused on the needs of others. A bit black and white. I lead ["called manage sometimes, which is a limiting word"] a bunch of people and i have for a very long time. I get enjoyment out of their success. But, when focused on things and stuff, i can be overwhelming. Frequently told to "dumb it down".
Thank you for the following. I only wish to share as i gain confidence in the knowledge. Everyone should be aware of this stuff. It is by omission and consent we get lulled into slavery.
It honestly takes a ton of time and research to get to the level of understanding i am sharing. So, i try to provide the references so people can look up their point of interest on their time. Hoping to provide context.
Supposedly you can access the trust through FedWire. I have not tried it yet. Free money is not my priority. I recently received a fourth letter from the IRS for taxes of which they want me to give them a return for 2 years ago. They keep bouncing to a new agent and address. Did my ROE in 2022 with no tax return, so, no contract. As each contract is annual. But, they are persistent. They never provide the required proof.
1) A Certified True Bill showing the exact amount i, am supposed to owe to the duly Constituted united States’ government; and
2) An itemized statement of account showing all goods and/or services delivered to me by said entity upon my request or demand; and
3) A Certified True Copy of the valid, binding and subsisting Instrument or Contract bearing my signature which authorizes this or any related collection activity; and
4) A Certified True Copy of the mandatory Article VI Oath of Fidelity for each individual in your organization who is involved with this collection activity; and
5) The policy number and name and address of the underwriter of the Bond(s) required by Law that insure said individuals in the handling of public funds; and
6) Positive identification of all real parties of interest to any valid Instrument or Contract which authorizes this collection activity, including all holders in due course on the Instrument;
7) Precise positive law that unequivocally proves jurisdictional authority and continued harassment and deprivation of rights;
And, they do not even send proper coupons. So, i send back another Notice, public notary, with requirement for several items of proof of contract. All very nice correspondence in the notices though. And they have been polite back, but no proof. So, they do not follow proper rebuttal UCC process with point by point responses.
As far as training, as with most things in my life, self-taught. I did earn an MBA and an engineering undergrad. But, the rest is life lessons due to needs. When things unlawful occur, i learn why it is permitted. So, that requires study just like a law student except actually understanding the terms, not just procedure and cases. Procedure is a tennis match ["their bastardized due process"] and challenging the paperwork and procedures. Time consuming, but usually effective. The problem is their courts. They have a "free license" with the BAR to make up stuff as they go along. So, other than a federal constitutional court, all district and State courts are not to be trusted.
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of
Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and
silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto
Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
So, no State can impair the Obligation of Contracts. And the State cannot coin money. No State shall make any thing but gold and silver coin a Tender of Payment for Debts.
But, if it is under the commerce clause, the Congress can make anything a debt and redeemable as they see fit as money.
Summary, no State or Congress may prevent people from engaging in contracts. As long as exchange occurs at the time of contract, there is no debt.
All of this is for a "S"tate ["body politic"]. It is not related to people. We can exchange in any way as mankind as we see fit. But, we will not be able to exchange with other bodies politic as it is regulated to their money definition.
If you mean a form of value exchange, then yes, that is how trade between mankind happens today. Bartering, exchange through coin, or anything else we deem of value that is not their currency that is regulated.
Please clarify your comment so as to hopefully respond with more clarity. If you mean a corporation, business, or organization to interface, then technically that is true and exists with the current structure.
This Twitter link is to the administrator of the group and there’s also a non-bar card attorney who is the mentor. Period.
excellent once again, sir shire. I will be sharing this with our assembly here
Hi Shire, what an amazing well thought out article and incredible detail. I belong to a freedom group called inalienable university they teach very similar things like your research. The group teaches you how to file a revocation of election with the IRS to eliminate state and federal taxes. You can also get a foreign national ID to eliminate sales tax. They also show you how you can eliminate your mortgage because it’s fraud as the note and the mortgage are separated. Based on Supreme Court rules.
https://x.com/legalfockery/status/1877082855886696778?s=46&t=NtV6V0TWeEhwXStKqeYcLw
Thank you for the link. I very much appreciate the connection. However... my bedside manner must suck.
i was kicked out in less than 3 days. i was honest i had done most of this before but believed there was more to learn and was looking forward to the group. I was seeking to understand Gianna's use of the word "baggage". Got me booted. She stated in general, that my comment makes her believe i have baggage (looking to learn more from others i guess). i stated that having baggage may be true if she was referring to not being completely in the private quite yet in all things (still have CC cards, bank accounts, etc.)... it is a continuous effort after having spent 45+ years on the other side. i suppose i was too blunt stating what was true and that i had experience in much of the items covered to that point (my deep dive in Freshman classes). It was not negative, simply facts. And, it was actually a compliment to their effort and content. i had not run into that before where it was so well organized.
i do not sleep much, so, it was an immersion and enjoyable for a couple days. Almost all items i already had compiled and put into practice from 4 years of research with some additional case references. i was looking forward to their DMV methods (i have all my own boilerplate revocations and follow-up responses/rebuttals previously created from study). i was also curious about their affidavit form versus my notice/affirmation approach (affirming is a little bit different than affidavit - one is actually legal and based on feudal times and the other is based on what a man does). The curiosity revolves around the State mostly using the word "notice" in their actual procedures and in Common Law a man gives notice of trespass and "commands" and "requires" (order or direct with authority) as a sovereign (they use the negative term "demand" which is to to ask or request with urgency - a request. Which is what a parent says to a child "i demand you to put that down!"). Yet, lawyers act like the word "notice" is a fake word while it is right there in their own procedures. The site did reference the word "require".
i happen to have played the tennis match (what the courts believe is due process through paper process commercial complaints and rebuttals) with lawyers and judges and placed DA's in default (DA's are responsible for the paperwork and proper process in their district). Actually working on some additional default notices and orders. Extremely similar content to what they teach.
So, i was very happy and impressed as they are the first group consistent and correct (as far as i can tell) in all the things i found wrong and lacking with other "freedom" groups ( i will not be rude and call out by name). So, my hat is off to them. Super impressed regardless of the little weight my opinion brings.
Although, i am sad i got booted. The number of mankind that are either self taught or understand the fictitious world is very small. At least without "freedom" movement people going into the off the wall stuff that gets you into being tested for mental stability.
Regardless of the misunderstanding, i would recommend their site for anyone looking to get started and navigate the fictitious world of "persons" and corporate fraud. The Freshman classes are very similar to what is shared in my articles, and their content has very good detail (frankly, i think theirs is dumbed down way better than my high level writing - i have a hard time writing to the eight grade level) of the items i have covered thus far.
Back to being fully accountable and responsible as i, a man. Still no group for i. But, thank you for reading the information as it comes.
Hi Shire, sorry to hear about your experience with the inalienable university and Gianna Miceli
I was almost kicked out myself by requesting too many courses at once. she is always very concerned about someone stealing her documentation. I have not entered the DMV course as I’m sure my wife won’t go along with that. We have conveyed our property to private, and have submitted the revocation of election For the IRS. The property process will take years to really work out though as our county treasurer ignores anything I’ve recorded at the county clerks office and any letters I have sent him.
Have you followed Jeff Wiseman? His group follows another path where they have accessed their trust through using the IRS.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jeffwitzeman/p/mahba?r=5gc6m&utm_medium=ios.
Where is the link to his Substack where he writes a weekly blog. I have personally spoken to him and he seems like a really nice guy.
Given the level of your research, you certainly must have some legal training as I’m quite impressed. I will continue to follow your work.
Thanks
Jeff
I suppose she may have thought i must be annoying as i might have been perceived as going too fast. I noticed how she likes to say she and Scott are "the only ones" and "nowhere else", and "are you paying for the course and other classes"? I've been told i intimidate people and my emotional intelligence is lacking when dealing with facts and stuff. Yet, it is very good when focused on the needs of others. A bit black and white. I lead ["called manage sometimes, which is a limiting word"] a bunch of people and i have for a very long time. I get enjoyment out of their success. But, when focused on things and stuff, i can be overwhelming. Frequently told to "dumb it down".
Thank you for the following. I only wish to share as i gain confidence in the knowledge. Everyone should be aware of this stuff. It is by omission and consent we get lulled into slavery.
It honestly takes a ton of time and research to get to the level of understanding i am sharing. So, i try to provide the references so people can look up their point of interest on their time. Hoping to provide context.
I actually sent some information to Jeff this morning for his readers in his comments section. Feel free to check it out. https://jeffwitzeman.substack.com/p/mahba/comment/85944164
Supposedly you can access the trust through FedWire. I have not tried it yet. Free money is not my priority. I recently received a fourth letter from the IRS for taxes of which they want me to give them a return for 2 years ago. They keep bouncing to a new agent and address. Did my ROE in 2022 with no tax return, so, no contract. As each contract is annual. But, they are persistent. They never provide the required proof.
1) A Certified True Bill showing the exact amount i, am supposed to owe to the duly Constituted united States’ government; and
2) An itemized statement of account showing all goods and/or services delivered to me by said entity upon my request or demand; and
3) A Certified True Copy of the valid, binding and subsisting Instrument or Contract bearing my signature which authorizes this or any related collection activity; and
4) A Certified True Copy of the mandatory Article VI Oath of Fidelity for each individual in your organization who is involved with this collection activity; and
5) The policy number and name and address of the underwriter of the Bond(s) required by Law that insure said individuals in the handling of public funds; and
6) Positive identification of all real parties of interest to any valid Instrument or Contract which authorizes this collection activity, including all holders in due course on the Instrument;
7) Precise positive law that unequivocally proves jurisdictional authority and continued harassment and deprivation of rights;
And, they do not even send proper coupons. So, i send back another Notice, public notary, with requirement for several items of proof of contract. All very nice correspondence in the notices though. And they have been polite back, but no proof. So, they do not follow proper rebuttal UCC process with point by point responses.
As far as training, as with most things in my life, self-taught. I did earn an MBA and an engineering undergrad. But, the rest is life lessons due to needs. When things unlawful occur, i learn why it is permitted. So, that requires study just like a law student except actually understanding the terms, not just procedure and cases. Procedure is a tennis match ["their bastardized due process"] and challenging the paperwork and procedures. Time consuming, but usually effective. The problem is their courts. They have a "free license" with the BAR to make up stuff as they go along. So, other than a federal constitutional court, all district and State courts are not to be trusted.
So this suggest we can create a new medium of exchange adopted by two or more men or women.
Constitution Article I, Section 10, Clause 1
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of
Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and
silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto
Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
So, no State can impair the Obligation of Contracts. And the State cannot coin money. No State shall make any thing but gold and silver coin a Tender of Payment for Debts.
But, if it is under the commerce clause, the Congress can make anything a debt and redeemable as they see fit as money.
Summary, no State or Congress may prevent people from engaging in contracts. As long as exchange occurs at the time of contract, there is no debt.
All of this is for a "S"tate ["body politic"]. It is not related to people. We can exchange in any way as mankind as we see fit. But, we will not be able to exchange with other bodies politic as it is regulated to their money definition.
If you mean a form of value exchange, then yes, that is how trade between mankind happens today. Bartering, exchange through coin, or anything else we deem of value that is not their currency that is regulated.
Please clarify your comment so as to hopefully respond with more clarity. If you mean a corporation, business, or organization to interface, then technically that is true and exists with the current structure.