Sole proprietor/tertium quid is undue influence. The spiritual species man is first in time per the Doctrine That First in Time Is First in Right. Nunc pro tunc. Also Error juris nocet.
The reference to "tertium quid" is something in the middle or between two things. The assumption is that the "sole proprietorship" is in between government and man. This is not exactly accurate as a man stands alone and the "thing" in between is not actually permitted by law (natural or common) due to lack of disclosure, no consideration, and intentional coercion. In reality, it is nothing, between or otherwise; a conjecture or lie of manipulation. Man is however, as you note so well, the first in time and all law. As you note in the balance of your comment. As is, was and always will be.
You have some valuable knowledge of the truth of the matter. You are correct. Tertium quid/92 chromosome chimera by a composition of matter from two known things - dad's 23 chromosome sperm + mom's 23 chromosome ovum = fetal 46 chromosomes + maternal 46 chromosomes that is an impossibility in nature/reality and is a lie by omission. It is per 8 USC 1 Born Alive by conception. The tertium quid stands between the spiritual species man and his/her divine creation/fertilization unless knowledge of it is expressed. The zygote is species man's biological father and their revolutionary arbitrary berth day is total nonsense. Man has first in time and right per mom's pellucid membrane she generated to get your biology safely to her uterine wall. Without her invitation to implant into the accretion/land with the pellucid membrane, they have no case.
This reality starts to break the wall of religious dogma as well. The presumption in numerous Papal Bulls is that the one needing spiritual jurisdiction by a religious organization is the "human being". A false presumption.
One of the things that should be seriously considered about mankind's status and rebutted is the presumption of being "human" ["all the leftover "product" of the act of coming into this world"] and the revoking of all the revocable contracts such as baptism, contrition, etc... These are false "adhesion contracts" as a seed of consciousness, a creation of the creator who creates, the living soul who does not need jurisdictional "shepherding" and intercession by a fictitious religious entity created by man. If the religious organization is not contacted and the presumption rebutted, they believe they still have control over the estate.
Quite silly once a man starts to really think about it... How can a religious entity or a religious man with a title have agency for a man's soul or his property? How can that fictitious entity have first hand knowledge of the man? This creates a fraud in law. Only a man can harm another man.
Yup their ecumenical economy per the "human creature," berth day and "throwing the baby out with the baptismal water." This One's still using first estate 46 chromosomes. Status quo parr bellum.
Cruden v. Neale
When a change
of government takes place from a
monarchical to a republican government, the
old form is dissolved.--Those who lived
under it, and did not choose to become
members of the new, had a right to refuse
their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere.
By being a part of the society subject to the
old government, they had not entered into
any engagement to become subject to any
new form the majority might think proper to
adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a
rule posterior to the formation of
government, and results from it. It is not a
rule binding upon mankind in their natural
state. There every man is independant of all
laws, except those prescribed by nature. He
is not bound by any institutions formed by
his fellow-men without his consent. The fact is, that he never was a
To the man, :Carl-david:, sending kindness and very welcome reply to thee (a more accurate word than 'you'). Simply sharing knowledge as it comes. It is a simple thing to love mankind enough to bring some understanding to the theatre that everyone has lived in for so long. Hoping it helps. The challenge: far too many are still wanting the convenience provided by government more than the responsibility to take their souls back. Language and courts have been corrupted for a very long time by players in a play. Or maybe, just maybe, some of this was the honing of the iron of knowledge long not shared. Perspective: without our current enslavement model, so carefully constructed, we may not have realized our higher calling. To be blessed as stewards of creation and what might be possible when we realize the difference between created fiction, and created reality. Mankind is not subject to laws of government. As we are the creators of law and our reality.
A land patent is also legal fiction. I am not yet convinced it achieves its goal. The only way I can see right now to deal with prop tax issue is to ‘pay’-perform via indorsement on their ‘bill’.
That is correct. It is an interesting reality that indigenous people all over the planet understand. We are only caretakers of the land. We are here in this material place temporarily. We can only claim property for a limited time and be responsible caretakers.
But, how can government or a religion have a higher claim than a man to property?
Well written. Clearer than any of the other explanations I’ve read.
Sole proprietor/tertium quid is undue influence. The spiritual species man is first in time per the Doctrine That First in Time Is First in Right. Nunc pro tunc. Also Error juris nocet.
The reference to "tertium quid" is something in the middle or between two things. The assumption is that the "sole proprietorship" is in between government and man. This is not exactly accurate as a man stands alone and the "thing" in between is not actually permitted by law (natural or common) due to lack of disclosure, no consideration, and intentional coercion. In reality, it is nothing, between or otherwise; a conjecture or lie of manipulation. Man is however, as you note so well, the first in time and all law. As you note in the balance of your comment. As is, was and always will be.
You have some valuable knowledge of the truth of the matter. You are correct. Tertium quid/92 chromosome chimera by a composition of matter from two known things - dad's 23 chromosome sperm + mom's 23 chromosome ovum = fetal 46 chromosomes + maternal 46 chromosomes that is an impossibility in nature/reality and is a lie by omission. It is per 8 USC 1 Born Alive by conception. The tertium quid stands between the spiritual species man and his/her divine creation/fertilization unless knowledge of it is expressed. The zygote is species man's biological father and their revolutionary arbitrary berth day is total nonsense. Man has first in time and right per mom's pellucid membrane she generated to get your biology safely to her uterine wall. Without her invitation to implant into the accretion/land with the pellucid membrane, they have no case.
This reality starts to break the wall of religious dogma as well. The presumption in numerous Papal Bulls is that the one needing spiritual jurisdiction by a religious organization is the "human being". A false presumption.
One of the things that should be seriously considered about mankind's status and rebutted is the presumption of being "human" ["all the leftover "product" of the act of coming into this world"] and the revoking of all the revocable contracts such as baptism, contrition, etc... These are false "adhesion contracts" as a seed of consciousness, a creation of the creator who creates, the living soul who does not need jurisdictional "shepherding" and intercession by a fictitious religious entity created by man. If the religious organization is not contacted and the presumption rebutted, they believe they still have control over the estate.
Quite silly once a man starts to really think about it... How can a religious entity or a religious man with a title have agency for a man's soul or his property? How can that fictitious entity have first hand knowledge of the man? This creates a fraud in law. Only a man can harm another man.
Yup their ecumenical economy per the "human creature," berth day and "throwing the baby out with the baptismal water." This One's still using first estate 46 chromosomes. Status quo parr bellum.
Cruden v. Neale
When a change
of government takes place from a
monarchical to a republican government, the
old form is dissolved.--Those who lived
under it, and did not choose to become
members of the new, had a right to refuse
their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere.
By being a part of the society subject to the
old government, they had not entered into
any engagement to become subject to any
new form the majority might think proper to
adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a
rule posterior to the formation of
government, and results from it. It is not a
rule binding upon mankind in their natural
state. There every man is independant of all
laws, except those prescribed by nature. He
is not bound by any institutions formed by
his fellow-men without his consent. The fact is, that he never was a
citizen. Had that fact been stated, we should
have replied to it.
another great post, thanks
To the man, :Carl-david:, sending kindness and very welcome reply to thee (a more accurate word than 'you'). Simply sharing knowledge as it comes. It is a simple thing to love mankind enough to bring some understanding to the theatre that everyone has lived in for so long. Hoping it helps. The challenge: far too many are still wanting the convenience provided by government more than the responsibility to take their souls back. Language and courts have been corrupted for a very long time by players in a play. Or maybe, just maybe, some of this was the honing of the iron of knowledge long not shared. Perspective: without our current enslavement model, so carefully constructed, we may not have realized our higher calling. To be blessed as stewards of creation and what might be possible when we realize the difference between created fiction, and created reality. Mankind is not subject to laws of government. As we are the creators of law and our reality.
A land patent is also legal fiction. I am not yet convinced it achieves its goal. The only way I can see right now to deal with prop tax issue is to ‘pay’-perform via indorsement on their ‘bill’.
That is correct. It is an interesting reality that indigenous people all over the planet understand. We are only caretakers of the land. We are here in this material place temporarily. We can only claim property for a limited time and be responsible caretakers.
But, how can government or a religion have a higher claim than a man to property?
It cannot. Unless the man does not know his real status. Alas…..