Simplifying The Explanation of How Mankind is Controlled
Are you your driver's license? Are you your passport? Are you your credit card? Which you are they talking about?
In the last article the details were covered showing the proof that the ALL CAPS NAME is the business created with the birth certificate. There is some misunderstanding about the “owner”. The “owner” is also a fictitious entity. How do we know? Only an “artificial person” can interact with government or other fictitious entities. The “owner” is not the man, it is a title. Any title is a fiction. It is limiting and controlled.
However, a man has no limits.
When anyone holds a driver’s license, passport, credit card, birth certificate, or any other interface with governments or incorporated businesses and they ask,
“is this you?”…
the answer is simple.“How can i be a card, driver’s license, passport, etc…?”
It is not possible.“Is that a trick question? i am standing right here in front of you. i do not understand.”
The Interface with Government
A method is necessary to interface with the government and for them to control commerce and the credit of the nation as guaranteed to the government by the Constitution.
First, create a corporation.
“That whenever a legislature has the right to accomplish a certain result, and that result is best attained by means of a corporation, it has the right to create such a corporation, and to endow it with the powers necessary to effect the desired and lawful purpose, seems hardly to admit of debate…” Slaughter-House cases, 83 US 36 - Supreme Court 1873.
The government needed to create a corporation to interface the man with government and control commerce and credit. The goal was to increase economic growth while also siphoning the property and assets of the people. If you believe you ARE the NAME or interface tool, you can be controlled and your property "stolen” without ever realizing what is happening. And the government can have plausible deniability.
At a Sheriff’s sale, in theory, they are not selling a man’s property [“although you think that is the case”], they are selling the assets assigned for the benefit of the corporate sole that the real property is named under. The corporate sole is responsible for the property taxes.
The corporation sole [“sole proprietorship”] created by the birth certificate can only have a certificate of title [ as a “registered owner”]. It cannot claim anything as property. So the ALL CAPS NAME [“and small derivations thereof”] is swapped based on convenience as either a corporation, owner, grantor, drawer, beneficiary, taxpayer, property owner, real estate owner, and other various titles as is required for the commercial activity and the various trust relationships.
That birth certificate creates the sole proprietorship and a trust arrangement with a continuation of ownership to a religious organization. In very basic terms, the Birth Certificate is the Article of Incorporation for the new business. We are not explained this little trick that the Vatican holds all land in perpetuity through a color-of-title that uses a sole proprietorship NAME. That NAME is the only NAME used for all transactions after birth. The only way to gain allodial title to the land is actually claim it as a man and the same man has removed all bonds and liens associated with the corporate sole name and proven the succession of title. Otherwise a religious organization holds all assets in trust that are under any ALL CAPS NAME sole proprietorship. A religious organization is also a fictitious entity. The title of a Pope is also a fictitious entity. He is a man first and responsible if he causes any harm to another man. This asset transfer to a religious organization is clearly expressed in the following court case:
“The corporation sole is a venerable creation of the common law of England and is well established under common law in California. (Santillan v. Moses (1850) 1 Cal. 92; Archbishop v. Shipman (1889) 79 Cal. 288 [21 P. 830].) California by statute has legitimized this tradition and regulates the formalities attendant upon the creation and continued existence of the corporation sole. (Crop. Code, § 10000 et seq.) (2) One principle purpose of the corporation sole is to insure the continuation of ownership of property dedicated to the benefit of a religious organization which may be held in the name of its titular head. Title will not be divested or passed to that person’s heirs upon his death but will be retained for the benefit of the religious group and passed to the successors to his office.
The issue, as defined by the trial court, “is whether the assets of a corporation sole are the personal assets of its titular head, and thus subject to execution for his or her debts.” The answer on the basis of legal authorities defining the corporation sole and its attributes must be, as the trial court concluded, an unequivocal, “no.”
Since the assets of the individual currently holding office, in this case Delmar Ashurst, are not the assets of the corporation sole, and vice versa, each is subject to separate accountability. The creditors of the corporation sole may not look to the assets of the individual holding office, nor may the creditors of the individual look to the assets held by the corporation sole.” County of San Luis Obispo v. Ashurst, 146 Cal. App. 3d 380, 383 (1983).
The NAME or sole proprietorship is the citizen of the United States or U.S. Citizen. Not the man or woman!
Second step the government takes is to create an account to manage [“and siphon”] the transactions and taxpayer revenue. It is done through voluntary compliance, because a man needs to volunteer to BE a “taxpayer” [“fictitious entity”].
The man acts as the agent or authorized representative for the corporation that was created by the mother’s, and sometimes father’s uninformed consent when a man is born. The mother and father gave up your information to the State to create a birth certificate and registered that NAME with the State [“corporate sole created”]. Then the same mother and father permitted the creation of a tax account (EIN number) to confirm that the new corporation is a “taxpayer” and tool of the government in commerce and permitting the subsequent access to the assets and credit of the man being presumed to be the corporate sole.
Think about it this way, a fictitious entity cannot make a decision in the natural world. So, the man is tricked into thinking he is the fictitious entity, and then responsible for everything fake created through negotiable instruments as promises to pay or orders to pay. Then when a negotiable instrument is not indorsed properly, the responsibility falls onto the man presumed to be the owner of the corporate sole. Mankind willingly accepts this fate. Silly, right?
A man is born free. The only value in this world is his time and work to create and make what he needs to survive and thrive. Every convenience given up to government oversight is what is taxed and taken.
When a man goes out into the working world, he or she gets a “job” and receives “income”. That same man fills out various forms that convert, or change, the man on paper to the presumptive sole proprietorship business with the use of the social security number and ALL CAPS NAME. That same man then signs “under penalty of perjury” that all information is true and correct. That man has just pledged himself to BE a fictitious entity and give up his compensation as “income”, and that he is actually this fictitious entity called a “taxpayer” and “employee”. The only “taxpayer” is the ALL CAPS NAME business. The only “employee” is the ALL CAPS NAME business. That business, for legislative control purposes, is a “natural person” and/or “individual” by their own term definitions, and thus, a “taxpayer”.
If you instead do a compensation agreement to do work as a man, and do not sign an employment agreement as an employee [“an employee is part of the government and receives wages therefrom - by a United States corporation”], you do not owe taxes as a “taxpayer” since you are making an agreement as a man.
There must be a contract by which a man becomes a “taxpayer”. That proof of contract must exist. And it must be renewed annually because the contract is fulfilled at each tax return period. Does the “employer” have the man’s fictitious corporate sole NAME update the forms each year? No, a man volunteers into this role. These are the W4, I9, and other taxpayer forms. If you opt out as a man on the W4V form and do not fill out all the other entrapment forms at all, a man is not a “taxpayer”. Being a “taxpayer” requires voluntary compliance.
Clarification about Passport
There were many questions about the terms “national”, “non-citizen national of the United States”, and “national of the United States” and how that relates to the passport. They are ALL “persons”. The only way to get a United States passport is by using the ALL CAPS NAME corporate sole. It is the government interface.
A man cannot get a United States passport. Only a fictitious entity can get/be a passport in the government world. The states of the Union do not offer passports to mankind since before the civil war.
So, pick the corporate sole version of nationality, confer it on the NAME by any means whatsoever, and fill out the passport form. The first page is all about the corporate sole NAME. The second page is about the man or woman. In all cases, pick “no” to U.S. Citizen. Mankind was born on the land and soil and once you claim the name back as your property [“do not presume you are an owner of said corporate name”] you can decide what nation that name has nationality. Make a choice on the address. Use an RFD route # if desired. However, utilize 00000 for the zip in the “permanent address” area. The point is that the passport is not YOUR passport. It is the corporate sole’s passport. It is simply an interface to governments.
If asked by the gate agent “if this you?” when he holds the passport, the obvious answer is “i do not understand. i am standing right in front of you. How can i be that passport book?”
However, you can claim the passport book as your property and that it belongs to you for travel purposes. You claimed it - but you are not an “owner”.
Well written. Clearer than any of the other explanations I’ve read.
Sole proprietor/tertium quid is undue influence. The spiritual species man is first in time per the Doctrine That First in Time Is First in Right. Nunc pro tunc. Also Error juris nocet.