The next article was going to be about the proper process serving of documents and the fraud of traffic tickets as well as the basics of the tennis match of the court paperwork. However, the topic of marriage and the implications with contracts from the last article needs to be addressed.
Background
i have been blessed with bringing forth creations of the Creator who create. Six of them. Three genetically, and three by union with the woman who puts up with my impulsive need to evaluate things-and-stuff. Six total sons and daughters - property forever - in the most loving expression possible [“exclusive to i, from all others in society”]. Three boys, three girls. All the boys have the same first initial of their given names. All three girls have the same first initial of their given names. Yet, three are genetically from me, and three are genetically from my loving lawful companion. A “brady-bunch” of creation.
This is to help them understand what they are up against.
State for-profit Business Venture
The marriage license creates, in the eyes of the State, a for-profit business venture. If you are so blessed to have sons and daughters, they are considered by the State-of-State federal franchise, as the contract “bearing fruit” in the form of “children”. The general summary is as follows:
The State is considered the Parent when you get a marriage license because you approach them for permission. It is presumed that you are not competent to handle your own affairs. As a result of this application for marriage, the State needs to manage any marital disputes because you have either sworn before witnesses or declared under penalty of perjury that you are “non compos mentis” when signing the application for marriage. [“not explicit in all paperwork, but is implied and presumed since you asked for something else’s approval to get married besides your mother and father”]
non compos mentis - or de non memorie - Of unsound
memory or mind; Not of sound mind. A generic term applicable to all insane persons, of whatsoever specific type the insanity may be and from whatever cause arising, provided there be an entire loss of reason, as distinguished from mere weakness of mind. Somers v. Pumphrey, 24 Ind. 244. Potts v. House, 6 Ga. 350, 50 Am. Dec. 329. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition
You have declared yourself a “citizen of the United States” [if asked for in the application process”] and in need of a proper parent since you filled out the application for “persons” and “birth”. If this is not explicit in the paperwork, you are sometimes asked this question simply to be allowed to fill out the paperwork. However, the paperwork uses statutory defined terms that create the presumption of said "citizenship” including the redefined term “marriage”.
That parent is the State. This means any act going forward that causes dispute can be brought before the State for them to sort it out as you have declared yourself incompetent to handle your own affairs.Once a State marriage license is obtained, any sons or daughters are classified as “children” and primarily belong to the State as more for-profit “fruits” of the license agreement. This is further reinforced with the additional adhesion contract of the Birth Certificate where you sign over the “child” at the hospital. This was covered in great detail in a previous article. This is how CPS presumes jurisdiction over your property.
The contract subsists even after a State sanctioned divorce. Remember, you already deemed yourself incompetent in the marriage application. So, the marriage license still maintains a contract with the State even though you no longer have a contract with the ex.
The sanctity of marriage as a loving commitment between you, another of mankind and the Creator is not recognized by the State. Church and State is kept separate. A dead entity (State) cannot have dealings with the living creations of the Creator. Instead, it has an arrangement with the corporate sole that you mistakenly believe is you. You are basically contracting your corporate business to have an agreement with another corporate business.
A license is the making legal something that is otherwise unlawful. It is a license to kill a living soul and work solely with the dead entity.
Definition of "legal" is "The undoing of God's law." - 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a dictionary of arts, sciences and general literature / The R.S. Peale 9th 1893
Case Examples:
"The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States." W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452
“Constitutional questions obviously are unsuited to resolution in administrative hearing procedures and, therefore, access to courts is essential to the decision of such questions” Rodriques v. Ray Donovan (U.S. Department of Labor) 769 F. 2d 1344, 1348, (1985)
“ ‘in common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign, [and] statutes employing the [word] are normally construed to exclude it.’ Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L. Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 83 L. Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941) See also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 273, 91 L. Ed 884. 67 S Ct 677 (1947)” Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S Ct 2304.
“a sovereign is not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N.Y. 535, II Am. Rep. 751. U.S. v Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 241, Ed, 192
How the Entity Created with the Birth Certificate as the “Person” is Perceived in US Legal Code
1 U.S. Code § 8 - “Person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual” as including born-alive infant
(a)
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
(b)
As used in this section, the term “born alive”, with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
(c)
Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being “born alive” as defined in this section.
An infant is non compos mentis. And it remains that way throughout the life of the “citizen” unless rebutted.
The Marriage Application
Here is an example from a random County of Pennsylvania.
This document example uses terms such as “residence”, a “person” performing the ceremony, “birth”, “birthday”, “parent” [“remember this is a pair who rents”], and that it is sworn correct and submitted to the “Orphan’s Court”. Did that last part about “orphans” ever spur a curious thought? Why would people marry and record through the “orphan’s court”? Well, if you have a birth certificate you are presumed to be a ward of the State, and hence an orphan. This is why the mother’s maiden name is used for the transmission of vital information on the Birth Certificate application in the hospital.
NOTE: One of our wonderful and beautiful creations recently had a son of his own. It is our first grand baby. We were in the hospital when the nurse was having them fill out all the paperwork creating a Birth Certificate and a Social Security number. It was beyond painful. We made mention to the scam, but were met with the “brilliant knowledge and condescending stare” of a young twenty something couple intent on following the rules of the system. We are such silly “old” people not consenting to the system.
In his defense, our son is a Marine. As such, you must follow orders. Not orders from the caring and loving man and woman who have some pavement behind them through life experience… but, the orders of the hospital staff who are also simply following orders to keep their licenses [“the license that is making something legal that is otherwise unlawful”].
In this particular example application above, it does not ask if you are a U.S. Citizen [“aka; citizen of the United States”], but many do ask this question to establish 14th amendment jurisdiction. It is likely this was asked as well as a “driver’s license” to fill out the application.
Many applications also state it is a felony to give any false information knowingly. A fear based scare tactic right in the middle of preparing for what was thought to be a solemn act.
Revocation of Marriage License
What follows would only apply if you believe you applied and obtained a marriage license under false pretense. If you are okay with being a subject of the State and in return get the benefits and privileges associated with their courts, rules, laws, statutes, etc… then there is no need to revoke the contract. Staying an infant is your choice.
This is a choice each individual man or woman can make.
This is not legal advice. [“legal advice is criminal as it is undoing the law of the Creator”]
The content is for knowledge and education purposes only.
It is always wise to do your own research.
Also, this revocation DOES NOT need to be done by both people on the marriage license. A contract is one with another. Since this is primarily a legal contract with the State, and the man and the woman as corporate sole entities, each has their own responsibility for their understanding and decision. The State is presuming that this contract is only a “dotted line” between the marriage entities and not associated with a holy union. It is primarily with the State.
The obvious question then deals with the unlawful marriage license and how to revoke the contract. As explained in the last article, there are key elements to having a valid contract.
Simple question: Did you know and fully understand ALL [“or any”] of the implications revolving around the marriage license as noted above? Did someone simply tell you that you needed to fill it out? If “no” to the first question and “yes” to the second, you did not have fully informed consent and true understanding of the presumed contract.
Look up in any search tool the meaning of “Doctrine of Parens Patriae”. What you will find is that the license application you completed created the presumption that you are unable to take care of yourself. As such, this doctrine is enacted by the government to “protect its citizens” that otherwise cannot protect themselves. Remember, you said you could not take care of yourself already when signing away your sons and daughters and your rights to self govern in your own legal marriage.
Before getting into the details of invalidating that pesky legal contract, let’s prove out how the State defines marriage:
1 U.S. Code § 7 - Marriage
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.
26 CFR § 301.7701-18 - Definitions; spouse, husband and wife, husband, wife, marriage.
§ 301.7701-18 Definitions; spouse, husband and wife, husband, wife, marriage.
(a) In general. For federal tax purposes, the terms spouse, husband, and wife mean an individual lawfully married to another individual. The term husband and wife means two individuals lawfully married to each other.
(b) Persons who are lawfully married for federal tax purposes—(1) In general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section regarding marriages entered into under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction, a marriage of two individuals is recognized for federal tax purposes if the marriage is recognized by the state, possession, or territory of the United States in which the marriage is entered into, regardless of domicile.
(2) Foreign marriages. Two individuals who enter into a relationship denominated as marriage under the laws of a foreign jurisdiction are recognized as married for federal tax purposes if the relationship would be recognized as marriage under the laws of at least one state, possession, or territory of the United States, regardless of domicile.
(c) Persons who are not lawfully married for federal tax purposes. The terms spouse, husband, and wife do not include individuals who have entered into a registered domestic partnership, civil union, or other similar formal relationship not denominated as a marriage under the law of the state, possession, or territory of the United States where such relationship was entered into, regardless of domicile. The term husband and wife does not include couples who have entered into such a formal relationship, and the term marriage does not include such formal relationships.
(d) Applicability date. The rules of this section apply to taxable years ending on or after September 2, 2016.
In all cases they are talking about the lawful marriage of two corporate soles or sole proprietorships presumed to be infants. As defined in Black’s Law dictionary as source code for the circular defining of a natural person, business, corporation, corporate sole, corporation name, and sole proprietorship.
Reading these definitions above, you can see that the State only refers to a legal contract between entities. It has nothing to do with the sanctity of marriage.
A lawful marriage has a few specific criteria:
witnessed by at least two others of mankind
written statement of commitment
autographs of those who witness as well as those committing to marriage as well as the man/woman who acts at times as officiant and presides over the vows
As soon as a State sanctioned officiant and State license is involved, it is now a regulated legal contract under any of the legislation of Congress.
This means, when you fill out a passport application, if you ONLY have a lawful common law marriage and no State license, you answer NO to the question about marriage. The State only recognizes their licensing to wrap you into their rules.
Then the obvious question is; how do i revoke the unlawful State-of-State license?
Send a correspondence to the State County Clerk where the marriage license is held/created and politely request for a certified copy of the marriage application and license with a postal money order for the fee for copies. You can send certified, return receipt or priority mail. Make sure to make a copy for yourself in full color to file.
Upon receipt of the these documents, then write a new “Notice 1” as a Writ of Praecipe demanding the revocation of the mistake you made. We give notice to the courts and our public servants of what is to be done. It is best to send registered mail returned receipt. Make sure to make a copy in full color to keep for evidence.
Example:
(place you name and address as right indented - “i am” is at the right hand)
John-Named: DoeJane-Middle: Doe
in care of postal service address:
123 Long Rd
Somewhere, Some State CFXXXXXCF
(this next addressing goes on the left indent as they are your public servants)Freedom County Circuit Court Clerk's Office
Attention: Lady M Clerk, Clerk
Attention: Marriage Licenses
1234 County Rd
P.O. Box XX
Anywhereville, STATE XXXXX-XXXX
RE: Notice & Praecipe, Marriage License Cancellation - Record
Greetings:You will please take notice that I recently discovered that there are certain political liabilities which attach to the marriage license which, if they had been fully disclosed to me at the time I was induced into the Consent Contract, would have dissuaded me from doing so. For that reason and on that basis, I am hereby repudiating the said contract and rescinding my signature from and Declare void any and all forms, cards, and Instruments which may evidence the said mistake.
You will also forthwith please remove my name from any registration or license for the (State name without “The State of”) State and any political subdivision thereof as well as notify any and all interested parties of this status change. My individual sovereign Consent is withdrawn and reserved until further notice. No answer to this instruction is required, but acknowledgement of compliance would be appreciated. In the event you are unable or unwilling to comply with this instruction, I shall alternatively require of you evidence of your Article VI Oath of Fidelity as well as the policy number and name and address of the underwriter of your Bond.
(Again, place autograph of what follows as right indented)Respectfully submitted,
By: ______________________________________________©️
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
(Name of your State without using “of”) State Elector
By: ______________________________________________©️
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
(Name of your State without using “of”) State Elector
Enclosed: copies of marriage license application, marriage licenseThey may return the first attempt with some version of their canned phrase of “if you need legal advice”, while ignoring your command. Simply resend the same as “Notice 2” registered mail returned receipt. Repeat until they send back either stamped or they no longer rebut. After 60 days of non-rebuttal which is acquiescence, then move to step 4. Make sure to make a copy in full color to keep for your records.
Post three separate public postings rebutting the presumption of the State marriage license. Be sure to keep copies. The local newspaper is an option, or the local Post Office notice board, or similar public notice location. Take pictures or keep copies for your records as well as any receipt for publications.
Example Public Notice Post:
”Public Notice of Error
Any “marriage of incorporated entities” established or combined as Joint Venture properties pertaining to JOHN NAMED DOE and JANE MIDDLE DOE and the STATE OF (CAPITAL LETTER STATE NAME HERE) are dissolved by Mutual Consent and Declaration, and all assets thereof are claimed by the presumed Donors: John-Named: Doe and Jane-Middle: Doe of (town), (State).If you so desire, you can record at the court house, although this is not necessary and adds to privacy issues. They typically will send the notice back stating they do not understand and suggesting you get legal advice. You can resend until they do not return. Always send registered mail return receipt or priority mail with return receipt and/or tracking to verify delivery for evidentiary records.
Citizen Defined:
42 U.S. Code § 9102 - Definitions - United States citizen
(18) “United States citizen” means (A) any individual who is a citizen of the United States by law, birth, or naturalization; (B) any Federal, State, or local government in the United States, or any entity of any such government; or (C) any corporation, partnership, association, or other entity, organized or existing under the laws of the United States, or of any State, which has as its president or other executive officer and as its chairman of the board of directors, or holder of similar office, an individual who is a United States citizen and which has no more of its directors who are not United States citizens than constitute a minority of the number required for a quorum necessary to conduct the business of the board.
State Defined:
8 U.S. Code § 1101 - Definitions - States
(36)The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
United States Defined:
(38)The term “United States”, except as otherwise specifically herein provided, when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Summary:
A United States citizen is an entity of the United States. The United States as a place continentally located having its States including [“meaning limited to the list of like items”] District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianna Islands.
Black's Law 5th Edition: “‘Citizens’ are members of a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights.”
Your corporate sole is the individual who you are giving permission to contract into marriage with the State and is presumed to be the “citizen of the United States”. Your sons and daughters are converted to “children” which then places them into the jurisdiction of the State and it’s administrative courts [“although it is actually just the fictitious entity again created by their birth certificates”] where they are from that point forward considered perpetual infants.
Before running off to ask the State for permission, consider the implications of this decision and if you really want the State in your private affairs. If this is already done, ask yourself if there was full disclosure about this charade?
Lawful marriage as prescribed by the Creator is a blessed union. Is it worth undoing what is lawful to make it legal?
Yes! Marriage is another government program.
legalese looks like English but has different meanings. Application means you are a bagger and it is presumed that you know what you're giving up to get what you are begging for. Submit means you bend to another's will. Registration means giving away whatever you are registering to whoever you are registering it with. Submit an application to register means you have given away all your rights. Read Black's Law Dictionary. Lawful & legal are not the same.