Levels of Citizenship
Being people, Lawful Persons, or Legal Persons
State Nationality or Citizenship
So, ask yourself - What ever happened to state nationality and citizenship? Are the states not sovereign nations that agreed to be a union of States when Americans declared our independence in 1776? Were you not born in a state that is separate from “the” United States with distinct geographically defined borders separate from other states?
So, how many citizens and statuses are there around these great states, States and STATES, the United States and the United States of America?
Due to our inherited and unalienable rights, we are all sovereign at birth in America. All Americans start their lives with a political status of “state nationals”. This is also known as a political status of “jus soli” or “man of the soil”. At this point, there is NO citizenship. In other words, there is no obligation to serve any government. We are, however, of a certain nationality. Going back to our founding, the soil jurisdiction [“top three inches of the earth”] has us living ON states such as virginia, ohio, wisconsin, and are thus considered virginians, or ohioans or wisconsinites depending on the state from where we are born.
Early documents express this distinction of the soil naming convention with the lower case first letter. This convention can be found if you go searching historical records prior to 1851. The styling of the first letter changed, mostly after 1851, to express the land and soil jurisdictions together. They then became Pennsylvania, Virginia, Maine, etc… This was a more practical understanding due to English common proper nouns, and most jurisdiction references the States with the capitalized first letter. This is because land and soil are intrinsically connected.
On, At, In…
One of the most common tricks is the use of the words “on, at, and in”. We are born on, and live on the land and soil of our home state. We do not live “in” it. In the legal society, the use of the word “in” implies a type of entrapment and references being in the air [“MUNICIPAL courts”].
When going to court as a man, we are “at” court. It is being at a place to have court processes occur. The legal society uses “in” for entrapment of slaves “in” territorial and municipal courts being referenced as “States” and “STATES” on the Federal Legal Persons side of the government. If we accept, we then end up being stuck “in” court as a legal fiction.
This applies to citizenship as well. Are you a national or citizen “on” or “in” a state, State, or STATE? Also, a “ship” denotes a vessel of transport. So, anytime “ship” is part of a word, it is the meaning of being within said vessel that is the reference to the context of the sentence. And this is a maritime or admiralty jurisdiction.
State Land and Soil Political Status
The States of the Land and Soil jurisdiction offer and include four different possible political statuses:
1. state nationals,
2. state citizens,
3. State Nationals, and
4. State Citizens
Do you notice the styling [“capitalization”] changes as status is reduced [“down the list”], but responsibilities and duties are expected for the people as they move to People?
If you recall, or have read the “Who are you, a mark or a man?” article [“https://shirenews.substack.com/p/who-are-you-a-mark-or-a-man”], the Lawful Persons and people side of the republican form of community government include these four types of political status.
If you have read the “Coffee for the People anyone?”,[“https://shirenews.substack.com/p/coffee-for-the-people-anyone”] that article demonstrates how the three (3) Constitutions were created by the new Congress and fundamentally created business units doing business as three separate entities. This was directly a result of the treaties preceding the constitutions that gave America and Americans independence, but had mutually agreed duties that our founders agreed to that would be managed by the Sea (maritime and admiralty) and Global (municipal) jurisdictions. These jurisdictions are and have been managed by British and Dutch [“by way of Prussia”] for the Sea and Rome; and [“Vatican”] for Global corporations since the turn of the millennia and formally instituted by the Papal Bull of 1302. So, this is not a conspiracy theory as it is a formally understood separation of powers that the world [“particularly Europe”] has recognized for business dealings for centuries.
The same is true for the unincorporated land and soil jurisdiction that is a “form” of republican government through active communities, but not an actual formal “Republican Government”. The chart above shows the distinction on the land and soil side of the structure. This shows the unincorporated business units with the descending authority that includes increased duties and responsibilities for the community that is comprised of the people.
It is important to note, relative to your current community, your current SHERIFF is likely a “Law Enforcement Officer” (LEO) and NOT a “Peace Officer” (PO). If he is part of an incorporated town and county, and is paid through taxes, and enforces statutes, rules, codes and procedures, then he is acting in an LEO capacity. Our original Sheriffs were Peace Officers charged with keeping the peace, following, and enforcing Common Law. The lawyers and attorneys in a Common Law system had ZERO say in forms, procedures, or trials. The ONLY way a lawyer can stand in as an attorney at court for a man or woman, is if the man or woman is incapacitated and the lawyer acts as counsel without a license and no conflicting guild oath.
As a clarification from previous articles, the following is important to remember for word letter styling in Roman Law:
This styling follows in our Declaration of Independence, the Constitutions, the naming convention of states [“and States, and STATES”], and how names are styled “in” and “at” court. If the legal society presumes that you ARE your Legal Person name, then you are subject to the federal legal rules, codes, procedures, acts and statutes.
This is why:
Your names in all their forms need to be re-domiciled to the land and soil jurisdiction.
Names are domiciled and recorded and returned to their proper home state.
They are recorded as being claimed by the man or woman [“living soul”] on the land and soil.
Let’s revisit words:
Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition
DOMICILED. Established in a given domicile; belonging to a given state or jurisdiction by right of domicile.
By this definition, we can see that a name was established someplace [“notice that the word “state” is in lower case?”]. Man or woman is born on a birthday [“not a date of birth - that is for the birth certificate Legal Person”] and that man or woman has a home; and they live at their home on the land and soil. Since you claim your name, it [“the name”] gets domiciled to the proper home state.
RESIDENT. One who has his residence in a place. "Resident" and "inhabitant" are distinguishable in meaning. The word "inhabitant" implies a more fixed and permanent abode than does "resident;" and a resident may not be entitled to all the privileges or subject to all the duties of an inhabitant. Frost v. Brisbin, 19 Wend. (N. Y.) 11, 32 Am. Dec. 423.
Also a tenant who was obliged to reside on his lord's land, and not to depart from the same; called, also, "homme levant et couchant," and In Normandy, "resseant du fief."
Why would you decide to be a resident rather than claim your home and live there based on the definition above?
Look at your deed - the last “owner” swore to residency upon transfer [“to finalize tax burden responsibilities”]. WHAT!?
Why would you want to reside somewhere rather than live there?
The one option comes with taxes as a tenant. The other option is free and you are the king on your land.
This is why understanding words, ownership/owner, claim, and names is so important.
The land and soil republican form of government is set up as the people’s government. It was stalled between 1861-1863 as part of the “Civil War” and the onset of the Leiber Code [“through Lincoln’s very unconstitutional Martial Law General Orders 100”], Military Court Districts [“still in use today as MUNICIPAL courts”], and the presumption everyone was a now “resident” in a State instead of a man or woman on the state where they live due to the wide spread conflict and the need for restructuring of the government.
Notice how the word “orders” is used for for General Orders 100?
That is a military term.
By extension of definitions, you, as a man or woman, are not a federal employee or military soldier if not engaged in battle and part of the northern or southern armies. So, should those residential “orders” apply to you? NO!
Please read 1871 Part III of the Prussia Gate Series by Will Zoll for more background history on the actual illegal Mercenary conflict that was later called the “Civil War”. The naming of this conflict went through at least three iterations during and after the battles to make things sound better by the newspapers.
Note: If you get the chance, watch the movie “News of the World” with Tom Hanks from 2020. It was written by Paul Greengrass, Luke Davies, and Paulette Jiles. Someone understood the “resident” definition and civil war implications, and history from this writing group. There is a question asked during the film about residency [“since it was being asked by soldiers to people without a home state after the conflict”]. They also reference the fact that it was about the rich north versus the poor south who could not compete in commerce and trade. There are people who know what is true. Unfortunately, the general public does not. That true history is hard to realize even when shown to you through one of their propaganda mediums - the entertainment industry. The lines become blurred…
Federal International Sea and Air Political Status
The chart above allows for the breakdown of a different set of citizens under the Federal Government.
There are three common “federal” citizenship options that exist only in the international jurisdiction of the sea and global. These foreign citizenship options apply only to federal employees, dependents, territorial holdings, national lands, and foreign corporations created under federal guidance and patronage.
They are:
“United States Citizenship” - as described under Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 [“Federal States of States - aka State of Florida”]
“Citizens of the United States” - as described under Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2 [“Territorial States of States - aka State of Puerto Rico”] - [“Reference Obama stating 57 States YouTube video May 2008 - not an accidental comment”]
District Citizenship (not exceeding ten Miles square) [“and employees”] - as the lawmaking power under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 [“Municipal STATES of STATES - aka STATE of FLORIDA”]
Land and Soil Assemblies
Since the “Civil War”, there were the Reconstruction Acts. These were intended to “reconstruct” the lawful government. This act was pushed by various members of Congress who knew that the Federation needed to be re-convened and restructured since this was the government which gave power to the Federal Government that is currently acting in a wartime status without a declaration of war. The assemblies at the county and state levels needed to be re-populated with the people so the power could flow to the Federal Government.
Instead - we have been sitting with a rogue military government since 1868 with the Territorial and Municipal subcontractors running the show in both international and land and soil jurisdictions.
“Whereas no legal State governments or adequate protection for life or property now exists in the rebel States of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Florida, Texas and Arkansas; and whereas it is necessary that peace and good order should be enforced in said States until loyal and republican State governments can be legally established":” Reconstruction Acts
The Congress is stating in the Reconstruction Act quote above, that there are missing legal State governments and they need to be republican in form as guaranteed by the Constitution Article IV, Section 4, Clause 1. While this was to be occurring, however, military districts were set up. Guess what? These were also set up in ALL states and counties and are there to this day. How do we know? They are in all CAPS like “GRANT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT”.
The people never restructured their lawful republican forms of governments and the Federation [“through the Articles of Confederation”] has been dormant since the Commercial Mercenary Conflict called the “Civil War”. The evidence is everywhere in front of you by the words and styling of words. That is why this walk through definitions and Roman Law is so important. We complain about our government, but instead we should be looking in the mirror and working with our community and kick out the military courts and start volunteering to reconstruct.
By the way, this role call for the rightful American government has been done in all 50 states. However; the people who are awake are a small handful compared to what is necessary to fully restructure in every county.
Believe it or not, it is 100% up to you to fix the government. And the provisions are in place to make it happen including the Restructuring Acts.
However, due to a rigged education system, medical system, and military media complex, people are absent and “lost at sea” due to their paperwork evidence trail [“happily provided by our subcontractors with the intentional application of wrong words in every form we use”], and the inability of families to know what is true. So, we watch what is going on, sit on our couches, and complain. Yet, we are the only ones who can peacefully fix this mess. This fix needs to occur at the local level and state level first. The corporations need to be kicked out and the federal monetary kick-backs refused.
You Can Do It!
Please consider visiting your local State Assembly website and start down the path of education. In the meantime, these articles with all the references will continue to be written with the hope that people have enough of an attention span and curiosity of how their unalienable rights and gifts can put the Federal subcontractors back in their rightful place.
The goal is not to remove the Federal subcontractors or dismantle the government. The goal is quite truly the opposite. The goal is to finish reconstruction and let the international jurisdiction of the sea-and-air handle our international commerce, treaties, and military protection of the states; all while we protect and support our communities by taking back our names, homes, and political status so that our communities can trade privately again and perform land-and-soil commerce separate from the sea and air international commerce.
People, unfortunately, think the government needs removed. The reality is your local government needs to be reconstructed and taken back. Your political status as a man or woman needs to be corrected. And that starts with you.
See Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) which clearly states:
7. Military commissions organized during the late civil war, in a State not invaded and not engaged in rebellion, in which the Federal courts were open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their judicial functions, had no jurisdiction to try, convict, or sentence for any criminal offence, a citizen who was neither a resident of a rebellious State nor a prisoner of war, nor a person in the military or naval service. And Congress could not invest them with any such power.
8. The guaranty of trial by jury contained in the Constitution was intended for a state of war, as well as a state of peace, and is equally binding upon rulers and people at all times and under all circumstances.
Yet the Civil Equity courts are still in operation since the “late civil war”. They are obligated to stand down to the local Common Law courts of the land and soil if those Common Law courts are present.
Next Time
It is time to clarify this whole “strawman” discussion. The hope is, if you have been reading previous articles, you might now see that fictitious entities are what are created after conception and birth. This includes your names. It is amazing what can be done with paper and fictitious entities to trick the mind into marking yourself and not taking responsibility as a man or woman. We give up all power through paper.
Imagine: we create fake stuff, and then put a higher value on that fake stuff than on our own existence. Seems silly, but… that is what paper and the pen has done to our humanity and our souls.
Thank you. i have determined through research something very similar. That is also why a proper string of adjectives in a prepositional phrase after the preposition and article needs to connect the words that have a singular meaning to be proper communication for the time-honored-tradition of the con. Especially if used in a contract.
And, if the words are capitalized or underlined and not defined, it is simply a sign and incoherent. "What is your definition of "is"?"
And yes - also why we do not use Bouviers when dealing with their courts to decipher their code language. You will be eviscerated since they use the same or similar words with different meanings in Black's to entrap. You must compare both and know when you are dealing with MUNICIPAL court. That is also why you do not use their case law ["post 1868 in America"] for statutory MUNICIPAL proceedings ["look at the definition of proceeding"]. It is their cases and their rules they are talking about. They ignore Common Law completely. So, their cases only pertain to their corporate world. Compassion is growing in my heart for those who are not following this in sequence to see the development of the con.
An "invoice" without a corresponding bill or fee notice prior to any action is invalid and does not create debt. That is the work of a private corporation with private rules and has no effect on a man or woman.
Appreciated observations and sharing.
i am not an expert by any stretch, but when the code clicks, it is a whole new world of awareness. i have sent many notices and have many more lined up. The use of notices does work. Period. They cannot have the con on the record. To be free is to set your boundaries with your notices and follow-up. It takes work, but it results in truly being free. They work so well, that if done in order of escalation, then create the evidence of the incorrect presumption, then return service for misaddressing, then point out violations of their own codes documented as evidence, that they are accountable to, the world changes. Their rules need to work or else their whole house of cards collapses. Those rules allow for evidence in your favor.
A birth certificate is a gift. It is evidence. All their statutes are a gift if you know you are not part of their business. All their signs are a gift if you start to see the pattern. It is all about agreements and evidence. Complaining allows them to have already won. But a claim and notices and evidence, those are facts and what is true.
i do apologize if this commentary will be very confusing for many reading this.
i am glad you find it useful. The goal is to share information so others may go and do their own research with some background to help that journey. i do not give advice, legal or otherwise. Each man or woman is responsible and accountable to make their own journey.
With that said, there will be a follow up to this particular post due to a response email received. It is necessary to demonstrate the trap of perspective due to language, their courts versus our courts, and miss-application of cases within their jurisdiction which, by the nature of the sea and air court itself, is limiting in permitted scope and focus. It is like putting four or more grocery stores right next to each other and stealing employees from one store and holding them accountable to the rules and procedures in another store. And constantly doing that and expect the one employee to just accept all the other store rules.
The followup will be a breakdown of cases attempting to refute the information in this article. i will be breaking down the dates, jurisdiction, misaddressing of names, unlawful conveyance of language and words, and how that impacts cases per 18 USC 1001 (a)(1) and 18 USC 1341 and 1342. These statutes apply to U.S. Citizens and the government persons in their various forms; not Americans. This breakdown will include references to Statutes-at-large prior to the inaccurately named civil war that properly relied on Common Law. Cases after the civil-war time frame rely on Statutory Municipal and Territorial Law which is based on Roman Law and Canon Law. Using their cases as reference is a reference to territorial and municipal law. It does not even contemplate Common Law as a scope due to the jurisdiction limitations. They have even stolen Common Law as a phrase to reference their actions as the Law of the Land when THEY are on the land and not at sea (maritime and corporate). Everything is a trick and inversion. Until people start recognizing the duplicity, it is easy to be trapped in the paradigm.
This is the purpose for showing Black's Law Dictionary definitions. Those are the definitions of THIER courts. Bouviers dictionary ["Consider using revised 6th edition - 1856 or earlier"] covers American Law ["and by extension, land and soil jurisdiction"] prior to the military district court take over through Martial Law. If you strictly use Bouviers Law Dictionary, you will get trapped as the Roman and Canon courts use the same or similar words with different definitions. Real Property in Common Law is NOT the same as Real Property in Territorial or Municipal jurisdictions. This is part of their trickery and word magic. All statutes after the mis-named civil war use their language. American Common Law typically uses Bouviers Law Dictionary and the law as established by the people through proper trial-by-jury. ["so, basically not in use today unless invoked in your definitions for cases as a man or woman."] THEY use jury trials. Read the media - even Epoch Times falsely references jury trials as being what the Bill of Rights allows. But the correct words are "trial by jury". All inversion.
"Amendment VII: In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
It is also important to separate the constitutions ["specifically that they are contracts between the Confederation of States through the Articles of Confederation and the new Territorial and Municipal government as outlined in the constitution itself"] which are business units by themselves and not conflate people with the persons serving as our subcontractors.
Their courts will not and cannot address our land and soil laws as the jurisdictions are different. That is why the understanding of Ex parte Milligan is so important. It is like grabbing a man walking down the road, bringing him into your private business, and then telling him he is now subject to the private company rules. Yet, this man off the street has no contract or part of your private business. Yet, we have been sold, hook, line, and sinker that somehow Americans are company employees of the U.S. Government. The next article will cover this conversion scam.
We have been taught to believe that the constitutions are for us. They are not, they only reference protections to us if we are operating as a man or woman in their jurisdiction and that they cannot interfere, but only reaffirm, the rules of the land and soil jurisdiction. Which, has also been grossly abused due to the district courts and the lack of Common Law courts and assemblies.
The follow-up to this article will take some time as it requires much work to dismantle multiple territorial and municipal court case documents ["the paperwork makes the court as a contract - if the paperwork is in error, there is no contract - an thus no court"] through grammar and statutory violations.