We were born to do, not hope. Nothing negative presumed on this end.
This was a very different post for very much the reason you state. More of a Hello! It is simpler and yet not in plain sight. "Human Beings", "civilians", "persons", etc... All words we misuse daily. Then our thought process runs amok using those incorrect terms. How easy to enslave when we are taught to do it to ourselves through language. Then add the belief that our constitutions were written for Americans... wrong again. They are contracts/compacts/service agreements between the Confederation of States, Federal Government, and Municipal Governments. All internal operating agreements and elections for officers of those service corporations. We are owed good faith service from those public servants. Yet, we think we are part of the insanity.
As far as The North American Union Treaty signed by George W. Bush, this was to further the Globalist control scheme. And, if one understands that U.S. Inc, is a sea jurisdiction, then it is easy to understand that GWB had no authority to sign what would appear to be a land jurisdiction treaty as an officer of a sea jurisdiction government corporation. So, it is technically non-binding to the land jurisdiction as long as the people who are men and woman say no.
It is quite entertaining to read and listen to Aether Pirates of the Matterium. His work seems to be very close to a reality that we all do not yet understand. Our purpose here is more than what is in religion.
To pose a question: What if when Yeshua said "the only way to the Father is through me", it was the spirit of Origin that is in each one of us was the "me" He was referring to?
To take this logic one step further from John Chapter 14: "8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. 9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? 10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. 11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake. 12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. 13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it."
If the Father is in Him and in us and we can do as great or greater things if He dwells in us as in Him; and are one of the same... well, that is a simple logic conclusion that the meaning is not through Yeshua, but through the Father, the seed of consciousness that is in each one of us. This clearly states that he, me, i, you, my name, and Father are of the same. What does that do to religion?
Excellent! Thanks for the validation of your and my reality right now. Those that have had their heads in the sand are pulling them out of the sand. Or we are assisting them to see what is happening here as a mass culling.
I have been following the hopium for a few years now. I also listened to all the Derek Johnson info quite a bit last year. If there is any truth to all of it, we should start to see RESULTS at some point, .... SOON, or it will all be considered just more hopium BS.
Oh, ... and Today WAS Jan 31st !! So far, nothing noticeable has transpired on this day.
Agreed on all counts. The important take away is that things are not what they look like on the surface in the spiritual war. And, a plan only lasts through first engagement. The hope is that people do not plan on hope. We all need to be active players in our future, not NPCs. That starts with knowing who you are in the grand scheme of the universe. Are you a "human being" now that you know the origin of the word, or a man as a living soul? That simple decision, completely in your control, will dictate everything else. That, and the agreements you make. It is each man's choice.
The post is a sharing of many things that impact the way we view the world and the current immigration crisis and a perspective of other reasons for the theater. And to get in that habit of asking different questions about things and words we take for granted that impact that perspective. Using words like person and human being is using the words they planned for us to use that entrap. Also, believing the visual on the surface of what they give us to see does the same thing.
The treaty is a real thing that Bush put in place. That is not discussed at all. Why our founders created the government is also not discussed related to the actual parties to the Constitution. It is not about the men and women of the states that is discussed in the Constitution. It is the wrong jurisdiction. We are led to believe "democracy" is what is being protected. That is their control structure. We make up a republic form of government at the local level. Not a democracy.
So, what you are looking for is the actual SSP agreement between the groups. It was confirmed this agreement took place on March 3rd, 2005. There are fact sheets, general information, and corporations created out of this agreement to facilitate the effort. It is VERY hard to find the actual agreement they signed ["which is clearly stated did happen in their 1st year "reunion" statements.
"Hope works remarkably well when it is part of one’s Belief System,...But, hope sucks when it’s a strategy" ~Stuckey, the blogger.
Was that Bush senior who signed that? I remember reading that Clinton signed some culling agreement with the UN also. as part of the Agenda 21 garbage. My place in the machine doesn't even reach the level of a cog. I'm old, disabled, broke and struggling, ..... but I am sharing all the info I can get, on a daily basis. Also buying as much ammo as I can. I live near Phoenix, so it could get sketchy here early on. I wasn't being negative about your post, just replying with my opinion on that situation. I consider the topic a slight side step from the regular topics you cover, but I feel it is more a great exclamation mark that says "See?? Look !!" and it also got emailed out to the contact list just like every other installment. I get quite a few newsletters in the email and there aren't many newsletters that I read as soon as they hit my inbox,. many sit there for several days before I can get to them. I can only think of three that get my attention immediately, The Shire News and Doug (Uncola) Lynn over at The Toll Online who also posts at The Burning, Platform, and Clif High. These three get read immediately, but for different reasons, 1. Digging In. 2. Decompression from overload. 3. Purely entertainment Woo. lol And where only one or two contacts might get the Clif, a half dozen or so get the Uncola, but E V R Y O N E gets the Shire !! When dredging the internet for vital information that everyone needs to know, there is hardly a better example.
To answer the series of questions, it will be best to do another post with some visuals and actual excerpts from the documents to better illustrate and answer.
I would love that. Thank you so much. Can you also include the reference/source for proving that the District of Columbia Gov and British Teritorial Gov adopted the Roman Style writing conventions so that every time we see the all caps and upper case first letter versus all lower case it is their foreign government and not the American?
Was it adopted by one of the early congresses or how did they get to have a separate writing conventions than ours?
Roman/Canon law styling was simply the convention used and people were taught this (at least "educated" people) for centuries. So, the founders, mostly wealthy land owners, used the conventions of Roman law as a standard reference. It was not an adoption as it plainly existed. The big change was the Bouvier's Law Dictionary that clearly defined land jurisdiction terms for America that were different than Roman. Black's first edition was written after the civil war to satisfy the legal society changes and to begin controlling the law. This is easy for you to research by going to the original editions and see the copyright date and then start studying the terms. Do some research on some of the documents for states prior to 1851 and you will see the lower case reference. After 1851 the documents changed to American proper noun convention and so did the Roman styling. But, in the early 1900's documents started going back to Roman styling with the exception of the soil jurisdiction seemingly absent. And at this time the municipal military district courts had taken over due to the Lieber Code initiation of martial law districts. It seems the proper noun switch and then switch back was intentional to confuse the masses with the municipal courts. And Roman law was not taught to the general public anymore.
Involved from the standpoint that I have corrected my evidence and political status to remove the false presumptions and remove agreements and aggression contracts wherever possible. Involved from the position of researcher and then sharing the information. I was not asked. So, I believe that makes me a citizen of the Republican form of government (not elected or voted because that is not how a Republican form of government works) as having a responsibility to inform and help mankind peacefully restart the lawful government that has been dormant since the civil war and reconstruction. I set out to prove Anna's ramblings wrong for my own sanity (since I did know something was very wrong) and found myself proving her unequivocally right. So, with knowledge as power, a responsibility exists to share in a way people might understand what I have learned and what Anna has been trying to share. I started from scratch because I could not make sense of her information. So, I dug in and started reading and researching and was astonished. It requires work. I fear a large portion of the population would rather be taken care of rather than be a part of correcting the problems of previous generations who slept through the slow changes or were distracted by the planned chaos that fosters in these manipulative control changes. I have a duty to put this together so people have references and exact evidence. There is a new post after your answer post that gives very specific evidence in detail for those who wish to stand as mankind. I was told I have such a great organized set of evidence that I should charge for it. But, that would defeat the purpose. We are stewards. Donations are fine, but the information is free for those who care to do a little work themselves. This life was given to me for free. I should honor that gift.
Not complete yet. Trying to be concise in the information. It may be in a day or so. About half of it is together. Your response deserves some effort to walk though the chronological steps and actual words. Our foundation was a series of documents with dates to accomplish the needs as we established our interaction internally as a series of nation-states, how to introduce new states, and how to interact externally to the world while maintaining the sovereignty of each of mankind. But the first Constitution notes and letters clearly establish the intent and method that answers your questions. Of course, after the turn of the 19th century, this is not taught. And "constitutional scholars" are either intentionally hiding it, do not know how to read as it applies to law, or are so institutionally brain washed they cannot see the words.
The people in office were clearly elected by the People of the State. This would indicate they are voted on by the representatives of the Confederation of States ["who created the new Congress and federal government - "a new organization" per the letter from George Washington to himself in the new role"] in the private ["initially unincorporated"] elections. At the local level, our government was a "republican form" of government as defined in Black's Law dictionary, and per Bouvier's Law Dictionary which is the American Common Law Dictionary before the inland piracy of the BAR, means "REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that "the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government." The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §180" and means people take on a responsibility to local government and are supported by the "citizens" ["others taking on the duties and responsibilities for local government"] to help make the local and state government run. Most importantly, it supposes the local government already existed and functioned, and not necessarily as an electoral base, but more as a responsibility that rotates.
So “people in office” were federales voted by the People who were representatives of the Confederation of States (State=Confederate State). Did I get it right?
Weren’t the representatives of the Confederation also elected?
We were born to do, not hope. Nothing negative presumed on this end.
This was a very different post for very much the reason you state. More of a Hello! It is simpler and yet not in plain sight. "Human Beings", "civilians", "persons", etc... All words we misuse daily. Then our thought process runs amok using those incorrect terms. How easy to enslave when we are taught to do it to ourselves through language. Then add the belief that our constitutions were written for Americans... wrong again. They are contracts/compacts/service agreements between the Confederation of States, Federal Government, and Municipal Governments. All internal operating agreements and elections for officers of those service corporations. We are owed good faith service from those public servants. Yet, we think we are part of the insanity.
As far as The North American Union Treaty signed by George W. Bush, this was to further the Globalist control scheme. And, if one understands that U.S. Inc, is a sea jurisdiction, then it is easy to understand that GWB had no authority to sign what would appear to be a land jurisdiction treaty as an officer of a sea jurisdiction government corporation. So, it is technically non-binding to the land jurisdiction as long as the people who are men and woman say no.
It is quite entertaining to read and listen to Aether Pirates of the Matterium. His work seems to be very close to a reality that we all do not yet understand. Our purpose here is more than what is in religion.
To pose a question: What if when Yeshua said "the only way to the Father is through me", it was the spirit of Origin that is in each one of us was the "me" He was referring to?
To take this logic one step further from John Chapter 14: "8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. 9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? 10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works. 11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake. 12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. 13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it."
If the Father is in Him and in us and we can do as great or greater things if He dwells in us as in Him; and are one of the same... well, that is a simple logic conclusion that the meaning is not through Yeshua, but through the Father, the seed of consciousness that is in each one of us. This clearly states that he, me, i, you, my name, and Father are of the same. What does that do to religion?
Excellent! Thanks for the validation of your and my reality right now. Those that have had their heads in the sand are pulling them out of the sand. Or we are assisting them to see what is happening here as a mass culling.
I have been following the hopium for a few years now. I also listened to all the Derek Johnson info quite a bit last year. If there is any truth to all of it, we should start to see RESULTS at some point, .... SOON, or it will all be considered just more hopium BS.
Oh, ... and Today WAS Jan 31st !! So far, nothing noticeable has transpired on this day.
Agreed on all counts. The important take away is that things are not what they look like on the surface in the spiritual war. And, a plan only lasts through first engagement. The hope is that people do not plan on hope. We all need to be active players in our future, not NPCs. That starts with knowing who you are in the grand scheme of the universe. Are you a "human being" now that you know the origin of the word, or a man as a living soul? That simple decision, completely in your control, will dictate everything else. That, and the agreements you make. It is each man's choice.
The post is a sharing of many things that impact the way we view the world and the current immigration crisis and a perspective of other reasons for the theater. And to get in that habit of asking different questions about things and words we take for granted that impact that perspective. Using words like person and human being is using the words they planned for us to use that entrap. Also, believing the visual on the surface of what they give us to see does the same thing.
The treaty is a real thing that Bush put in place. That is not discussed at all. Why our founders created the government is also not discussed related to the actual parties to the Constitution. It is not about the men and women of the states that is discussed in the Constitution. It is the wrong jurisdiction. We are led to believe "democracy" is what is being protected. That is their control structure. We make up a republic form of government at the local level. Not a democracy.
What happened to the NAU treaty ? Has anybody see it? If you google for it, you will find information that it never happened.
https://americanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2008NAUFS8.5x11-8-page.pdf
https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050323-4.html
So, what you are looking for is the actual SSP agreement between the groups. It was confirmed this agreement took place on March 3rd, 2005. There are fact sheets, general information, and corporations created out of this agreement to facilitate the effort. It is VERY hard to find the actual agreement they signed ["which is clearly stated did happen in their 1st year "reunion" statements.
It’s a private agreement not legally binding on anyone. That is why they don’t have to share it.
Thank you so much for this.
The fourth sentence reminded me of a quote.
"Hope works remarkably well when it is part of one’s Belief System,...But, hope sucks when it’s a strategy" ~Stuckey, the blogger.
Was that Bush senior who signed that? I remember reading that Clinton signed some culling agreement with the UN also. as part of the Agenda 21 garbage. My place in the machine doesn't even reach the level of a cog. I'm old, disabled, broke and struggling, ..... but I am sharing all the info I can get, on a daily basis. Also buying as much ammo as I can. I live near Phoenix, so it could get sketchy here early on. I wasn't being negative about your post, just replying with my opinion on that situation. I consider the topic a slight side step from the regular topics you cover, but I feel it is more a great exclamation mark that says "See?? Look !!" and it also got emailed out to the contact list just like every other installment. I get quite a few newsletters in the email and there aren't many newsletters that I read as soon as they hit my inbox,. many sit there for several days before I can get to them. I can only think of three that get my attention immediately, The Shire News and Doug (Uncola) Lynn over at The Toll Online who also posts at The Burning, Platform, and Clif High. These three get read immediately, but for different reasons, 1. Digging In. 2. Decompression from overload. 3. Purely entertainment Woo. lol And where only one or two contacts might get the Clif, a half dozen or so get the Uncola, but E V R Y O N E gets the Shire !! When dredging the internet for vital information that everyone needs to know, there is hardly a better example.
Also, why did George Washington mail a letter to himself? What is the meaning in sending a letter to oneself?
To answer the series of questions, it will be best to do another post with some visuals and actual excerpts from the documents to better illustrate and answer.
I would love that. Thank you so much. Can you also include the reference/source for proving that the District of Columbia Gov and British Teritorial Gov adopted the Roman Style writing conventions so that every time we see the all caps and upper case first letter versus all lower case it is their foreign government and not the American?
Was it adopted by one of the early congresses or how did they get to have a separate writing conventions than ours?
Roman/Canon law styling was simply the convention used and people were taught this (at least "educated" people) for centuries. So, the founders, mostly wealthy land owners, used the conventions of Roman law as a standard reference. It was not an adoption as it plainly existed. The big change was the Bouvier's Law Dictionary that clearly defined land jurisdiction terms for America that were different than Roman. Black's first edition was written after the civil war to satisfy the legal society changes and to begin controlling the law. This is easy for you to research by going to the original editions and see the copyright date and then start studying the terms. Do some research on some of the documents for states prior to 1851 and you will see the lower case reference. After 1851 the documents changed to American proper noun convention and so did the Roman styling. But, in the early 1900's documents started going back to Roman styling with the exception of the soil jurisdiction seemingly absent. And at this time the municipal military district courts had taken over due to the Lieber Code initiation of martial law districts. It seems the proper noun switch and then switch back was intentional to confuse the masses with the municipal courts. And Roman law was not taught to the general public anymore.
Thank you so much. Your explanation is so valuable.
Are you involved with Anna’s work to expose the continuing fraud and bring back our lawful government?
Involved from the standpoint that I have corrected my evidence and political status to remove the false presumptions and remove agreements and aggression contracts wherever possible. Involved from the position of researcher and then sharing the information. I was not asked. So, I believe that makes me a citizen of the Republican form of government (not elected or voted because that is not how a Republican form of government works) as having a responsibility to inform and help mankind peacefully restart the lawful government that has been dormant since the civil war and reconstruction. I set out to prove Anna's ramblings wrong for my own sanity (since I did know something was very wrong) and found myself proving her unequivocally right. So, with knowledge as power, a responsibility exists to share in a way people might understand what I have learned and what Anna has been trying to share. I started from scratch because I could not make sense of her information. So, I dug in and started reading and researching and was astonished. It requires work. I fear a large portion of the population would rather be taken care of rather than be a part of correcting the problems of previous generations who slept through the slow changes or were distracted by the planned chaos that fosters in these manipulative control changes. I have a duty to put this together so people have references and exact evidence. There is a new post after your answer post that gives very specific evidence in detail for those who wish to stand as mankind. I was told I have such a great organized set of evidence that I should charge for it. But, that would defeat the purpose. We are stewards. Donations are fine, but the information is free for those who care to do a little work themselves. This life was given to me for free. I should honor that gift.
I do not see the new post after my answer post. Do you mean a new post in the thread of my answer post?
Not complete yet. Trying to be concise in the information. It may be in a day or so. About half of it is together. Your response deserves some effort to walk though the chronological steps and actual words. Our foundation was a series of documents with dates to accomplish the needs as we established our interaction internally as a series of nation-states, how to introduce new states, and how to interact externally to the world while maintaining the sovereignty of each of mankind. But the first Constitution notes and letters clearly establish the intent and method that answers your questions. Of course, after the turn of the 19th century, this is not taught. And "constitutional scholars" are either intentionally hiding it, do not know how to read as it applies to law, or are so institutionally brain washed they cannot see the words.
You are so wonderful. It’s a honor to meet you and I hope I can one day meet in person if not here in God’scoming kingdom.
Very kind. Perhaps someday. There is much waikng up to do in the meantime.
Shire: were the people ever supposed to be voters per the Constitution?
The people in office were clearly elected by the People of the State. This would indicate they are voted on by the representatives of the Confederation of States ["who created the new Congress and federal government - "a new organization" per the letter from George Washington to himself in the new role"] in the private ["initially unincorporated"] elections. At the local level, our government was a "republican form" of government as defined in Black's Law dictionary, and per Bouvier's Law Dictionary which is the American Common Law Dictionary before the inland piracy of the BAR, means "REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that "the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government." The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §180" and means people take on a responsibility to local government and are supported by the "citizens" ["others taking on the duties and responsibilities for local government"] to help make the local and state government run. Most importantly, it supposes the local government already existed and functioned, and not necessarily as an electoral base, but more as a responsibility that rotates.
i, hope this helps.
So “people in office” were federales voted by the People who were representatives of the Confederation of States (State=Confederate State). Did I get it right?
Weren’t the representatives of the Confederation also elected?