As always I find that you put much effort into your work and I feel your sincerity and I would just want you to know that I am not, in any way, attempting to denigrate your work.
At the end of the day man, human, human being or person exist in the illusion only. This illusion is sustainable by word only. If the word is uttered and a dictionary is needed to determine its meaning, then one of two things is true. Firstly, it has no meaning to you. Secondly, it was not intended for your ear. We all have been trained to reach for the book of definitions.
The words on the pages of the dictionary are someone’s opinion. Whenever we encounter words; whether spoken or written if the definitions are not provided by speaker or writer can we be certain of meaning? We make all this fuss about Blacks Law, Bouvier as if it is important, but it’s not. If there’s variance in the definitions, how are we to know precisely what is meant.
If one participates in the illusion he is recognized as one of the the creatures. All creatures have a creator. The creator have dominion over his creatures. Who is the author of the illusion of land, sea, heaven and earth? Does he not have reserved rights to his creatures? If you acknowledge that you are in earth/land, etc then, quite logically, you are his creature. It makes no difference if you believe that you are man or human. The only thing that matters is that you are in historical story. You, at the very least, are intellectual property.
All words are of the illusion and for the illusion. The basis was established in the indoctrination centers called schools and universities. If you are to escape the matrix of deception you must realize that this happened to you.
A question: what if you are the Creator? You are simply here as a spark of the Creator to experience all that is possible? What if you are i am? What if all souls are I am? And the illusion is simply for experience...? All words are then irrelevant.
Words are way too inadequate for this conversation but i will do my best. i am not created. i happened. I am not creature. I am author of my own story. Therefore i am creator of my being. To him that i have trespassed against i owe. It is not a question. It is realized
As an addition,did you know that we are told that ‘assume’ means the same as ‘presume’?
Whereas ‘assume’ means to take on, to accept, eg ‘assume the liability’.
In Nz, there is no legal definition in the legislation (Tax Act) for ‘income’ but through a tortuous process, discovery was made of this - “An amount is income of a person”.
In the ‘tax return form’ it says “for all income received put the amount in the box”.
So, writing in the box self-defines income.
‘amount’ is not defined anywhere I can see as yet.
Because it is all voluntary. Income is what you receive for doing a 'job' (something illegal for illicit gain). The penalty and cost of being permitted to do said job that would otherwise be illegal is a tax. An employee does a job and receives income and must pay tax that they voluntarily decide to do. Ingenious.
But, man works and gets fairly compensated for said work. It is called consideration. Any contract lacking equal and fair consideration is an adhesion contract.
Good find! The hue man creature requires salvation per Pope Bonifas VIII. Resident the res ID. One's Godly origin is fertilization to expiration last breath. They presume we are broken and require re cord to be put back togther. Status quo antebellum. Fictio cedit veratati! Thank you!
Thank you. I fwd it to 400+. We also include de facto and de jure see Black's Law 6th edition page 416. They changed the definition in Black's 11th. Bouvier 1856 is the correct dictionary. men and women are sovereign on the land and soil of our America..
A preponderance of evidence show this is a flat plane of land and water in the form of a diorama, with holographs.
As always I find that you put much effort into your work and I feel your sincerity and I would just want you to know that I am not, in any way, attempting to denigrate your work.
At the end of the day man, human, human being or person exist in the illusion only. This illusion is sustainable by word only. If the word is uttered and a dictionary is needed to determine its meaning, then one of two things is true. Firstly, it has no meaning to you. Secondly, it was not intended for your ear. We all have been trained to reach for the book of definitions.
The words on the pages of the dictionary are someone’s opinion. Whenever we encounter words; whether spoken or written if the definitions are not provided by speaker or writer can we be certain of meaning? We make all this fuss about Blacks Law, Bouvier as if it is important, but it’s not. If there’s variance in the definitions, how are we to know precisely what is meant.
If one participates in the illusion he is recognized as one of the the creatures. All creatures have a creator. The creator have dominion over his creatures. Who is the author of the illusion of land, sea, heaven and earth? Does he not have reserved rights to his creatures? If you acknowledge that you are in earth/land, etc then, quite logically, you are his creature. It makes no difference if you believe that you are man or human. The only thing that matters is that you are in historical story. You, at the very least, are intellectual property.
All words are of the illusion and for the illusion. The basis was established in the indoctrination centers called schools and universities. If you are to escape the matrix of deception you must realize that this happened to you.
The goal is to show that it is in fact an illusion. Even by their definitions. The bar majority have believed the illusion.
Hi Trixie. Thank you for your comments.
A question: what if you are the Creator? You are simply here as a spark of the Creator to experience all that is possible? What if you are i am? What if all souls are I am? And the illusion is simply for experience...? All words are then irrelevant.
Words are way too inadequate for this conversation but i will do my best. i am not created. i happened. I am not creature. I am author of my own story. Therefore i am creator of my being. To him that i have trespassed against i owe. It is not a question. It is realized
Excellent-
Thank you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjICYi0MEkY
and, therefore, invalid.
I have forwarded your post onto our assembly, for their edification
Another excellent article. Thanks Shire.
As an addition,did you know that we are told that ‘assume’ means the same as ‘presume’?
Whereas ‘assume’ means to take on, to accept, eg ‘assume the liability’.
In Nz, there is no legal definition in the legislation (Tax Act) for ‘income’ but through a tortuous process, discovery was made of this - “An amount is income of a person”.
In the ‘tax return form’ it says “for all income received put the amount in the box”.
So, writing in the box self-defines income.
‘amount’ is not defined anywhere I can see as yet.
Because it is all voluntary. Income is what you receive for doing a 'job' (something illegal for illicit gain). The penalty and cost of being permitted to do said job that would otherwise be illegal is a tax. An employee does a job and receives income and must pay tax that they voluntarily decide to do. Ingenious.
But, man works and gets fairly compensated for said work. It is called consideration. Any contract lacking equal and fair consideration is an adhesion contract.
Good find! The hue man creature requires salvation per Pope Bonifas VIII. Resident the res ID. One's Godly origin is fertilization to expiration last breath. They presume we are broken and require re cord to be put back togther. Status quo antebellum. Fictio cedit veratati! Thank you!
Thank you. I fwd it to 400+. We also include de facto and de jure see Black's Law 6th edition page 416. They changed the definition in Black's 11th. Bouvier 1856 is the correct dictionary. men and women are sovereign on the land and soil of our America..
A preponderance of evidence show this is a flat plane of land and water in the form of a diorama, with holographs.