The American Civil War - Part II

Treaties, Secret Plans and Such

Disclaimer:

At no time should a good and just man condone the enslavement of another man. Creation, whatever that is to each of mankind, does not conceive of bondage as a means to a material reward. The idea of enslavement is an antithesis to the Creation itself and at odds with the free will inherent in a living soul.

Enslavement of mankind has always been about two things: commercial success and power in the form of control. Converting a man to property is a path to damnation of the soul.

From property to slavery - and back again

There was a goal. America was at a cross roads. There was both a moral and ethical conflict to be leveraged in the minds of men - especially in America. When the federal government was established and funded by international commercial trade, the doors opened to enslave all of mankind. The light on the hill was an opportunity to redefine slavery. But, to enslave everyone in a nation and put them on the reservation, there had to be a way to divide the same nation and place in their minds the idea that abolishment of slavery was the first step to more freedom. It did not happen with a war. That was a way to cover the tracks of the commercial Treasury subsidies that created more wealth for those corporations to expand government. The main goal was bankruptcy and central banking. Once this was accomplished, full enslavement is possible. Mostly by enslavement of the mind. But, that explanation will come in a later post.

For now the longer term goal was a name game to steal property and control the money. It was only 52 years after the commercial mercenary conflict renamed the “Civil War” that this was achieved with the Federal Reserve.

“Very soon every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology we can compel people to submit to our agenda which will affect our security as a charge back for our paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel and we will hold the security interest over them forever by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us, will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none-the-wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all this is the only logical way to fund government by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges.

This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

Colonel Edward Mandell House in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson [President 1913-1921]

Controlling Trade, Commerce, and Customs Duties

For some readers to put things in perspective, a good example of the power of trade is what is played out in the films Star Wars and the role of “The Trade Federation” and the “Republic”. The control always narrows down to who controls the commerce in the form of food, commodities and other items that impact economic development within a nation [planet in the case of Star Wars] and how the money that controls that commerce is exchanged. Whoever controls the manufacturing, commodities, trade routes, tariffs, and monetary values; they control the world - or the universe.

As a side study, it may be worth some value to look into how many nations, and during what dates in history, Great Britain invaded and took over control of a nation in the form of colonization or trade. Then look at when they “left” that nation. Then look at what remained after the they “left”. The thing that usually persisted was the trade routes and impact on commerce and the currency used in said trade. Banks were created, channels for international trade were established, offices for managing this commerce remained. A way to funnel currency was established.

With this in mind, take a look at the American treaties in the country’s founding:

1. Treaty of Paris 1763

2. Treaty of Watertown 1776

3. Treaty with the Delawares, 1778

4. The Franco-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce, 6 February 1778

5. Dutch American Treaty of Amity and Commerce 1782

6. The Swedish-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce, 5 March 1783

7. Treaty of Paris 1783

8. Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce, 10 September 1785

9. The Moroccan-American Treaty of Peace and Friendship, 28 June 1786

10. Treaty With The Six Nations, 1794

11. The Jay Treaty 1794

12. Treaty of Peace and Amity Algiers 1795

13. Treaty of Peace and Friendship Tripoli 1796

14. Treaty of Peace and Friendship Tunis 1797

15. Treaty of Peace and Friendship Tripoli 1805

16. Treaty of Ghent 1814

In each case, look to see what was agreed upon and who benefited from the concessions? Especially look at trade/commerce and things like fisheries, access to waterways, access to fur trade and other commodities and production. Then look at who controlled the seas through people, vessels, fleets and ports as well as inland waterways.

Creation of American Companies [Federal Government]

It is important to understand some things to start;

1. America started as a Republican form of government at the level of the local communities. Self governance was the new way forward. This is not a formal and permanent elected government at the local level with the exception of a few roles like Peace Officer [Sheriff] and perhaps a Mayor or similar town/county representative and a Magistrate to administer disputes and cases of harm. The people were the jural assemblies who volunteered their time in the service of others. This is where the men would take part as a citizen and represent the local people in specific roles and matters of the law. Counties actually started as shires in many cases. This was reminiscent to the pre Norman Conquest and the local hundreds, tithings and shires organizing for the common good of those local people. An example in Virginia is below.

   1. Eight Original "Shires", Immediately Referred to as "Counties"---------1634

      Accawmack formed-----------------------------------------------------1634

      Charles City formed--------------------------------------------------1634

      Charles River formed-------------------------------------------------1634

      Elizabeth City formed------------------------------------------------1634

      Henrico formed-------------------------------------------------------1634

      James City formed----------------------------------------------------1634

      Warrosquoyacke formed------------------------------------------------1634

      Warwick River formed-------------------------------------------------1634
      Iberian Publishing Company. (n.d.). The Growth of Virginia, 1634-1895. Virginia Genealogy Atlas, 1634-1895. https://genealogyresources.org/Va_map_1634.html

2. People came together and sent local citizens [“what they are called when they have duties and responsibilities to the people”] to be a representation of the local community at the county and then state/colony level. The colonies sent representatives to the Continental Congress level. These were called delegates.

3. There were no Police Officers [policy enforcers], only Peace officers.

4. Local militia had nothing to do with federal military other than a responsibility on the federal government to train the militia. This is described in the enumerated duties. The federal government had a separate military to protect our borders and commercial trade interests.

With this basic foundation, it will hopefully be easier to understand how our country initially began governance and what is meant by the guarantee of a republican form of government. That is self-governance without political parties, corporations, military courts, or external influence.

Below is what the newly formed political States created after 1776.

Why is this important? It is very important to understand where we started to better understand where it went off track. Below is a top down look at the power from the people.

Notice how the Federation [“The United States of America”] is four positions down in the pecking order?

Also notice how the Articles of Confederation [“creating the States of America”] came out of the Continental Congress?

In previous articles we covered the three constitutions and how the 1789 iteration created the United States of America and the 1790 constitution created the United States.

People do not notice the subtle difference. In fact, we are somewhat encouraged to not realize the difference as it allows for crossover of jurisdiction by the government when it suits them. Those of mankind do not realize the difference.

We do not ask the right questions.

If we assume what our forefathers helped establish is the same governmental structure we have today; and then go trying to change the people in the same failed federal system, we are starting from the wrong premise and baseline. We need to start at the local and county level. Though, it is easier to bring together a state-wide assembly for education and then trickle down the county level corrections.

Each of the major levels of government in our country operate in very different political styles.

When the private corporation of the United States and its officers go complaining about “saving our democracy”, they are only talking about the territories and the 57 STATE OF STATE governmental entities. In other words, the incorporated STATES and territories. It is very interesting to see the theories of the meaning by Barrack Obama back in 2008 in his famous “visited 57 States” comments. “Snopes.com” [“fact checked based on what exactly?”] has it so wrong, it seems almost intentional rather than ignorance. Since we are not taught our history, there is no way for the public, who has been through the public school system, to know the difference between a nation-state [“republican form or style of government”], a State [“Republic”], a territory and a STATE OF STATE [“STATE OF OHIO - Democracy - 57 of these”], or the municipal government of Washington DC [“plenary oligarchy”].

This background is important to understand the importance of the shift in voting, parties, and for which company the people were tricked into participating in voting in fraudulent elections set in motion by the commercial mercenary conflict that began in April of 1861. Mankind in the form of the people did not register to vote in elections with the republican form of government. The community knew who was an American and who was not. Naturalization was the main method of claiming political status. Both Pennsylvania and Virginia had very similar Acts for naturalization around 1779. And expatriation out of being a federal United States Citizen to a state citizen was codified in the original federal Title 25.

Commercial War

Why and how did Abraham Lincoln get elected with a title “esquire” [“title of nobility”]?

That is a title that comes with a license or pledge. That license or pledge and title creates obligations, duties and responsibilities to uphold the guild oath associated with the same title.

Was this not what the founding fathers were warning about?

Constitution Section 9, Clause 8, “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Constitution Section 10, Clause 1. “SECTION 10. No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.”

James Buchanan, who preceded Lincoln, also had a title of lawyer. The term esquire was used as early as the late 1700’s in America after British gentleman or knights [“typically knights in training”] tradition, and later became more common for the legal profession.

Does a lawyer’s oath supersede their oath to serve the people?

That means two presidents leading up to and into the commercial mercenary conflict that was later coined the “Civil War”, had crossed the line of titles in potential violation the Constitution upon entering office.

Did Lincoln get the title from the State? Did he get the title from the United States? Did Lincoln know the difference in the title of lawyer versus citizen of the United States? We may never know. However, there are some basic facts that did occur and are easy to verify upon his election to office and the subsequent military mercenary conflict.

No More Constitution for the united States of America

What happened? How did it happen?

The basic reality is commerce, primarily controlled through incorporation and the British sea dominance through the British East India Company, which never lost the hooks into America after the Treaty of Ghent. Economic growth in America had significant dependence on the success of getting goods to other countries and importing goods into America. This commercial trade was delegated to the Federal Subcontractors upon the creation of the three Constitutions.

In 1861, the original Confederation of States dissolved. The tension between the north and the south over fair commercial trade was ever increasing. Special treatment was given to corporate businesses in the Northern States. In the south, for the raw material producers to compete, they needed slave workers.

This exact condition is outlined in the “Declaration of Causes of Seceding States”. There are many details to unravel, but the Georgia explanation describes much of the reasons for contention.

Georgia:

The party of Lincoln, called the Republican party, under its present name and organization, is of recent origin. It is admitted to be an anti-slavery party. While it attracts to itself by its creed the scattered advocates of exploded political heresies, of condemned theories in political economy, the advocates of commercial restrictions, of protection, of special privileges, of waste and corruption in the administration of Government, anti-slavery is its mission and its purpose.

…

The material prosperity of the North was greatly dependent on the Federal Government; that of the South not at all. In the first years of the Republic the navigating, commercial, and manufacturing interests of the North began to seek profit and aggrandizement at the expense of the agricultural interests. Even the owners of fishing shacks sought and obtained bounties for pursuing their own business (which yet continue), and $500,000 is now paid them annually out of the Treasury. The navigating interests begged for protection against foreign shipbuilders and against competition in the coasting trade.

Congress granted both requests, and by prohibitory acts gave an absolute monopoly of this business to each of their interests, which they enjoy without diminution to this day. Not content with these great and unjust advantages, they have sought to throw the legitimate burden of their business as much as possible upon the public; they have succeeded in throwing the cost of light-houses, buoys, and the maintenance of their seamen upon the Treasury, and the Government now pays above $2,000,000 annually for the support of these objects. Theses interests, in connection with the commercial and manufacturing classes, have also succeeded, by means of subventions to mail steamers and the reduction in postage, in relieving their business from the payment of about $7,000,000 annually, throwing it upon the public Treasury under the name of postal deficiency.

The manufacturing interests entered into the same struggle early, and has clamored steadily for Government bounties and special favors. This interest was confined mainly to the Eastern and Middle non-slave-holding States. Wielding these great States it held great power and influence, and its demands were in full proportion to its power.

Notice how the initial discussion was about slavery as a right to property? However, the grievances were quickly clarified to be about the subsidies and benefits to Northern States obtained by the Federal Government through the Treasury that made the Southern States less competitive. Where did the Federal Government at that time get its funding? Through customs houses and excise taxes of trade goods. The other trade leverage was slavery. Again, with the Federal Government benefitting in the Treasury. The slavery market was widely controlled by the British East India Company.

More from Georgia:

All these classes saw this and felt it and cast about for new allies. The anti-slavery sentiment of the North offered the best chance for success. An anti-slavery party must necessarily look to the North alone for support, but a united North was now strong enough to control the Government in all of its departments, and a sectional party was therefore determined upon. Time and issues upon slavery were necessary to its completion and final triumph.

Slavery was used as a chess piece to stir division, it was not the main issue. Commercial viability was the bigger issue that was being softened by the use of slaves in the south. So, if you go after the competitive commercial value of the south by subsidizing corporations in the north, then take away the only leverage to compete at the time in the form of anti-slavery as an emotional movement against the south, you get a division of the federal government and the people. Yet, this fact is rarely if ever discussed in the lead up to the later media-labeled “Civil War”. Commerce was the driving factor, and with it the control of the customs houses and taxes and duties on trade. See the following two articles:

1871 – Part III

Friends in High Places

This is all before the central banking, Federal Reserve, and Fiat [federal reserve notes and bonds] currency. There was a plan afoot to gain more power in the federal government.

In 1861 the Federal Republic Congress adjourned sine die for lack of a quorum to conduct business, the Southern members of the original Confederation, created in 1781, formed the Confederate States of America in 1861. Jefferson Davis became the acting "President" of this new organization of "Confederate States" of the south. There was no congress seated to declare war. Hence, no official “war” was ever declared. There was also no official Congress to perform the enumerated duties.

What happens when a compact fails due to the parties to the contract removing themselves from participation and instead form a new organization? The old contract becomes void. And so, the Constitution for the united States of America became void and the power reverted back to the Federation of States known as The United States of America [unincorporated]. This would also make the two subsequent Constitutions of 1789 and 1790 null and void.

However, rather than dissolving the government as required by the Constitution, Lincoln maintained power through military control and sat a northern Congress of his support and continued business as usual.

Why would that be the case? Obviously not to keep the country together. It was already divided. The new southern Confederate government was established two months before the sieging of Fort Sumter, South Carolina in April 1861. Not to end slavery, as the new Confederation in the south elected it’s own President and was continuing as a new Union of southern States. Why operate the failed Congress that had no date to reconvene since the contract of the Constitution was void?

Some of the answers are in the Homestead Act of 1862 and the General Orders 100.

The ponderance of Lincoln - How to keep a nation “together”?