20 Comments
May 1·edited May 1Liked by Shire Herald

There was no war. It was a Conflagration or similar in name. War is identified as Declared by Congress Assembled. That is another lie. Wars are not concluded with Generals signing Armistice. The one with Washington and the Brit General did not fulfill expectations. The Treaty of Paris and the Northwest Ordinance are bogus. I have checked a lot of treaties. None of them are valid only color of law. The SAL of 1858 was written after Grant and Lee agreed no to fight anymore.

We have this all figured out and signed, sealed, stamped witnessed with proof of service published at www.orsja,org

So, are you in a Jural Assembly? It seems to be that those with the titles of nobility are deeper into the de facto and more willing to accept the punishment of the Medical board or pseudo ethics board of the Big Pharma MD loop of the Josef Mengele school of Medicine. We thought it was coming from the BAR / military / LEO.

The Sheriff with a proper oath to the proper Constitutions with Laws of Nature and of Nature's God included, a de jure County Executive. The office of Sheriff must be occupied by a body, mind, spirit, flesh, blood, soul man or woman with their bona fides in order in the de jure original jurisdiction of jura summi imperii.

Yes! We, meaning all of us, should be opposed to the de facto ( page 416 Black's 6th de jure is defined also ) as it is illegal or illegitimate. It self corrects when the Sheriff takes a proper oath to the proper Constitutions with God included. When that office is occupied by a de jure man or woman then law instead of color of law will move across the land and soil. www.orsja.org

Expand full comment
author

Correct you are:

No war as there was no seated Congress to declare war.

It was a commercial mercenary conflict.

And yes, people need to stand up their assembly in their state and counties and have a man affirm as sheriff.

Expand full comment
May 1Liked by Shire Herald

Of course, the idea of slavery is abhorrent; but it's an idea that goes all the way back to Noah, who cursed some of his own descendants to be slaves to his other descendants for eternity. We have been set a bad example, which we have a duty to reject and renounce.

Expand full comment

Now we are all slaves but we don't acknowledge it. How can we prove it? Try not paying taxes because your money is used to rape the Constitution (e.g. abortion)!

What’s your best way to wake-up those who don’t want to open their eyes?

Please share your most effective wake-up strategies.

The more the awakened, the sooner this nightmare will be over!

The most effective strategy is asking about the person’s opinion on some of these topics:

I start with the 20 million dollar question, while showing videos of baby seizures (money or babies always get attention):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/autism-day-shall-we-celebrate-the

If the person doesn’t want to discuss injections, then food is a good start:

Why is food poisoning legal?

How Rumsfeld forced the approval of Aspartame.

Artificial sweeteners, MSG, PFAS, Glyphosate ... go organic!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/why-is-food-poisoning-legal

Then I’d follow with "Are you opened to see if the actual data matches your opinion?"

Then I start showing some of the shortcomings of the Pharma industry:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/system-failure-ai-exposes-zero-government

Then, show that every single person on the planet should be suing Pfizer and Moderna for deliberately hiding human DNA in their vacicnes, and Pfizer, for injecting an undisclosed carcinogenic monkey virus (SV40) sequence into the cell nucleus of the clueless biohacked, as officially recognized by Health Canada !!!

If he doesn’t like the topic, I’d show this video (all you need is 10 secs in the middle, who doesn’t have 10 seconds for you):

https://odysee.com/@ImpossiblyWackedOutWorld:f/WTC-7-Free-Falling:8

(caveat about the beginning: pot destroys your brain + “Raises Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke”)

9/11: two "planes", yet the third tower (WTC7) imploded, free falling on its footprint like in a controlled demolition. It was out of reach, and all 7 World Trade Center towers needed to be rebuilt, not the closer towers not belonging to World Trade Center... and the “owner” took an insurance policy for the WTC against terrorism, just months before, when no one was taking them … he didn’t show up for work precisely on 9/11 … just as his 2 grown up siblings (they never skipped work before). The inside information about the FUTURE 9/11 event helped masons make trillions by shorting the stock exchange: the records were deleted by the SEC so they wouldn't be prosecuted !!!

Watch amazing short and more evidence here:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/911-2-planes-3-towers

Please watch all of this! Your life depends on it, because there's a plan to murder 95% of the global population by 2050… written on the masonic Georgia guide-stones: “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 … ”:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination

- J6: The false flag operation of the fake riot was planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!! The same mason-plot was copy-pasted to disband the insurrection against the stolen elections in Brazil! All intel agencies (CIA, FBI, NSA) were founded by masons and are run by them for their own nefarious goals.

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know

It's such a mason manual that they organized the same J6 play in Brazil when it was proven that the voting machines owned by mason Soros, were rigged:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/dominion-over-us

All political parties are compromised/infiltrated. For example, Italy supports vax pass and WHO Pandemic Treaty !!! Meloni's Government! People voted her for being against that!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/italy-endorsed-vax-pass-and-who-pandemic

- At least since the 90s, vaccines are weaponized to reduce the population, for example:

1. Adding hCG to infertilize women: lab detected in 30 countries

2. Overpassing the FDA 10 ng limit to human DNA “contamination” by 2000%, thus causing neuro-damage (autism, asperger, tics, dyslexia in 29% of kids, etc.) and childhood cancer epidemic (n.b. leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas)

Check soundchoice.org or videos at bottom after this page:

Free 100 redpill movies and documentaries:

(don't miss the 1st one, 10 min at 2x, an amazing tool to start a discussion):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos

- COVID was designed as a primer for even more lethal COVID haccines:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/not-vaccine-not-gene-therapy-just

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/what-do-bioweapons-have-to-do-with

- You’ll go nowhere and you’ll be happy:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/2050-youll-go-nowhere-and-youll-be

Elon's top secret: EVs cause cancer

Go green with gasoline!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/electric-vehicles-cause-cancer

- It's genocide for depopulation:

Depopulation or EXTERMINATION? (finest quotes):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depopulation-or-extermination https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

- You are the carbon they want to exterminate!

1. No one denies there's man-made climate change but scientists disagree on the cause and remedies.

Prehistoric data from ice cores proves that temperature rise precedes carbon release in the atmosphere, not the other way around.

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk

2. There's proof of deliberate geoengineering to increase global temperatures and droughts and decrease albedo by dissolving clouds with satellite Electro-Magnetic Frequencies.

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/satattack

3. Life involves a carbon cycle. A war on carbon is a war on life, causing food scarcity, increase in food prices and famines. Decarbonization is part of the plan to exterminate 95% of the population.

Killing me softly with green songs:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs

Carbon reparations:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations

Climate deaths:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths

- Their main source of power apart from sin-empowered demons? NOT a coincidence that the USA left dollar convertibility to gold in 1971, precisely triggering the exponential government deficit coupled with the trade deficit and inflation.

This is the Achilles’ heel of all nations: masonic and satanic secret societies counterfeit paper money and launder trillions with which they buy Banks, seats in the Federal Reserve (the only private run Central Bank in the world), political careers and parties, puppeticians, listed corporations, media, healthcare corporations and organizations, universities, foundations, judges, etc.:

Confessions of illuminati, David Rockefeller (finest quotes):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati

Ex illuminati Ronald Bernard: how the world REALLY works

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/confessions-of-illuminati-ronald

Attali illuminati (“finest” quotes)

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/attali-illuminati-finest-quotes

The way out of this mess:

1. Create an easy system for real money: private currencies/warrants based on real assets, goods, services, etc. (gold, corn, oil, distance/volume/weight transportation, labor human hour/minute, etc.)

2. Ban legal tender. Let the free markets decide which real-currencies/valuables/warrants they prefer to trade with

3. Ban paper-backed currencies (unlike real-backed ones of point 1.)

4. Enforce a Legal Banking Reserve of 100% of deposits (so banks don't create money based on air) and therefore there's no excuse for a Central Bank, because there would be no risk of bank-runs since all their loans are fully backed with deposits

Anything else you might think of?

Now, are you really ready for this?:

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

President John Quincy Adams: “Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong - essentially wrong - a seed of evil, which can never produce any good.”

If you are a mason or know a mason, ask him to ask his 33° master to put in writing and sign it, who is "the great architect" and that he is not Lucifer. If he refuses, then he’ll know who he is really serving, Satan: tell him to get out of masonry NOW. Sooner or later he’ll be required to trample on a cross to get to a higher degree.

Confessions of a former mason (Serge Abad-Gallardo):

https://www.ncregister.com/interview/confessions-of-a-former-freemason-officer-converted-to-catholicism

Confession of 33rd degree master mason - Masons worship deities/demons

https://rumble.com/v294ksc-words-from-33rd-degree-master-mason-rare-video-masons-worship-all-sorts-of-.html

Masonry's Satanic Connection

https://odysee.com/@HiddenTruths:c/Masonry's-Satanic-Connection:4

Masonry's Satanic Doctrine | From Their Own Books

https://rumble.com/v2wg24a-masonrys-satanic-doctrine-from-their-own-books.html

Do Freemasons Worship Lucifer? Evidence They Don't Want You To See

https://odysee.com/@John_4-14:a/Do-Freemasons-Worship-Lucifer%EF%BC%9F-Evidence-They-Don't-Want-You-To-See-%EF%BD%9C-Hidden-Agendas---Walter-Veith:0

Satanic Ritual Abuse and Secret Societies [1995] [VHS]

https://odysee.com/@thisworldworks:1/satanic-ritual-abuse-and-secret-societies-1995:3

Satanic Pedophilia Torture and Blood - Dark Satanic Secrets Revealed

https://odysee.com/@Gmail.com:52/822821884_Satanic-Pedophilia-Torture-and-Blood---Dark-Satanic-Secrets-Revealed:4

UNITED NATIONS LUCIFER AND THE LUCIFER TRUST

https://odysee.com/@dynosarus:c/UNITED-NATIONS-LUCIFER-AND-THE-LUCIFER-TRUST:4

Expand full comment
author

Look up the construction of statutes section of your states legislation. Then look up the definition of "person", "resident", "State", and "individual". Then look up the maxim of law "ejusdem generis" and "expression units est exclusion alterius". It will be apparent that it is ALL voluntary. If a man or woman chooses to volunteer to be a person, individual or resident, and to have "real property" instead of property, then that man or woman is now subject to the legal codes rules acts and statutes.

Sadly, the main way people pay attention is their pocket. They do not need to pay taxes. It is all voluntary. But you need to correct your evidence. Then the rules, procedures, codes, acts, and statutes do not apply to mankind.

Why correct the evidence? Naturale est quidlibet dissolvi eo modo quo ligatur - it is natural for a thing to be unbound in the same way in which it was bound.

Best to start with "Fruit from a Poisonous Tree" by Melvin Stamper. Then sign up for the knowledge share with "The Sovereign's Way" (thesovereignsway.com). Then join your states assembly and stand up your local county government with a lawful sheriff.

But, if a man thinks of themself as a title or a person, then duties and responsibilities take over and the man is finished to a title.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your explanation.

1. Even if you argue all that you go to jail if you don't pay taxes.

2. How can a person say that he is not a person, considering natural law (reflected by the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of the UN), that living human beings are persons with human rights, whether the law of the land recognizes this or not?

Expand full comment
author

The words are used to trick mankind - please read below:

Example of West Virginia Code for the word "person":

. . . §2-2-10. Rules for Construction of Statutes.

(9) "Person" or "whoever" includes corporations, societies, associations and partnerships, and other similar legal business organizations;

(10) "Personal estate" or "personal property" includes goods, chattels, real and personal, money, credits, investments, and the evidences thereof;

(11) "Property" or "estate" embraces both real and personal estate;

(13) "State", when applied to a part of the United States and not restricted by the context, includes the District of Columbia and the several territories, and the words "United States" also include the said district and territories; supra, paragraph 53 and 54.

Part II. Definitions.

. . . §8-1-2. Definitions of terms.

(13) “resident” shall mean any individual who maintains a usual and bona fide place of abode within the corporate limits of a municipality or within the boundaries of a territory referred to in this chapter, as the case may be;

(18) “Person” shall mean any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint-stock association, or any other entity or organization of whatever character or description.

The same definitions exist in the vehicle code and other State of West Virginia Codes.

26 USC 7701 (a) (1) Person The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.

1 USC § 1: “the words ‘person’ and ‘whoever’ include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;”

Based on ejusdem generis and expressio unius est exclusion alterius, Person, claimant, owner, resident, and individual are all fictitious entities, as in the rest of the list in 26 USC 7701, 1 USC § 1, §8-1-2 - 13 & 18, §11-6B-2 - 2,5 &10, §2-2-10, §11-4-3, other West Virginia Codes and is restrictive to the lists and definitions. The grouped term PROPERTY OWNER is not listed in any definitions in the West Virgnia Code.

Definition of "Human Being":

Human being - “sea monster” - Ballentine’s Law Dictionary [“sea jurisdiction”]

Monster - a human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal

Human - belonging or relative to man [“notice, not actually a man”] as distinguished from the Creator or superhuman beings - Hu-man, a Hue of man or color of man, but not a man.

Expand full comment

I think it was a word trick. "Person" should be a four letter word, ... or at least a fight'n word., like "Citizen". And the U.N.,, I think that's a whole different topic of corruption. How valid really, IS the U.N. ??

After reading through these three articles, it gave me a gut ache.

09/29/2021: Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework – Part 1: https://www.coreysdigs.com/u-s/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-1/

\

03/09/2023: Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework Part 2 – A Powerhouse of Ruin: https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-2-a-powerhouse-of-ruin/

\

10/29/2023: Laundering with Immunity: The Control Framework Part 3 – World Economic Forum Protected: https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-3-world-economic-forum-protected/

Expand full comment

What might I do to wake people up ? Well, I might just email them you comment, ...... and hope they don't freak out and light themselves on fire.

Totally saved this in a text file. There were some topics left out, lbut was plenty enough to earn it a file name "Blackpilled".

Expand full comment

Not blackpilled if there are solutions:

Pray MAGA: Make America God’s again. Pray “Thy Kingdom come”. Make the world His Kingdom of love. “God is love”.

The US national motto is “in God we trust”1, the Oath of Allegiance sums up in “so help me God”2, and the Pledge of Allegiance is “I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

“Under God”, not only means under God’s protection/providence, but also under God's will/authority and Commandments.

Why can't Governments work with religious NGOs and religions helping the poor and sick?

Separation of church and State means "freedom of conscience", i.e. that a Government should not impose any particular religion. It doesn't mean that public officials can't show and live their faith in public, and it means that the State must always put all actions "under God", definitely not “over” or against God’s Will. Lincoln: “the nation shall, under God, have a new birth of freedom.” 3

Freemasonry is the church of Lucifer. “Separation of church and State” requires eliminating the freemasonic demono-cracy over Government (theocracy comes from “theo”, God, “cratos”, power, but this has nothing to do with God, but Satan and his demons, so it’s a demono-cracy).

Get the murderers out of government: force masons to self-identify by law under severe penalty (their oath doesn't forbid self-identification, also, evil oaths are void).

MAGA (Make Assets Great Again): money should be 100% backed with gold and real assets. This makes masonic counterfeiting harder. They are buying everything with virtual money: listed corporations, media, medical system, political parties, prosti-ticians, universities… !

Satanic secret societies like the masons are increasing the financial supply through:

- Forging dollars using the Federal Reserve they fully control

- Money creation through bank loans without reserves

- Financial “wealth” creation out of thin air through financial instruments such as derivatives

- Government debt

It's what I call finflation: inflation of financial instruments

With those trillions they've bought control in all listed corporations, media, universities, political parties, medical societies, etc.

The way out of this mess: money and financial assets backed by real assets.

16 laws we need to exit Extermination Planet

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison

No Free Speech without Reach. We need a #FreeReach laws urgently!

http://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/no-free-speech-without-reach

Why is food poisoning legal?

How Rumsfeld forced the approval of lethal Aspartame.

Artificial sweeteners, MSG, PFAS, Glyphosate ... go organic!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/why-is-food-poisoning-legal

How about REAL democracy: townhall republican democracy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

Rethinking science

Sciencing the rigged and corrupt scientific system for an overdue turnaround

Unless we change it, we’re doomed to the next PLANdemic. And yet, nothing has changed, only got worse!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/rethinking-science

Government spends 2x per student in public schools with respect to private ones and 3x at university level, with worse outcomes in all levels of education.

Time for a 100% voucher system, where parents can choose schools or earn the voucher money themselves if they homeschool (and their kids pass the exams), or through grand/parent/teacher coops.

This would allow many mothers to leave a work they hate and stay home with their babies and children, especially in the most important years of childhood until 6 years old. It would have a deep impact on society.

Expand full comment
author

Pledge of allegiance was part of the trick. Pledging is part of the evil. And "the United States of America" is the federal government. So we have been taught to pledge to a fictitious military entity of sea jurisdiction. Yet, we are of the land and soil. But that is a longer "term" understanding.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this correction of history. I hope more people will read it and begin the task of deconstructing our present slave system.

Expand full comment

Epic post! Thank you very much :)

Expand full comment

The South got, via their 3/5 of a person slaves, the first 4/5 of the Presidents of the US. The Constitution gave the fake promise of attrition of slavery by the import slave ban of 1808. And yet as Madisons 50 year embargoed notes on the Constitutional Convention revealed, the South knew that the import ban would not extinguish slavery as slaves were being bred faster than imported. The South shouldn't have been allowed to take home their marbles after having four score years of abrogating the Declaration. I suspect British banksters influence via slave mortgages in all of this. The US Congress should not have had to wait on the created-equal-denying states to come back into attendance in order to function. These states removed themselves from the numerator and denominator of the quorum function by their criminal secession.

Expand full comment
author

The key here is both the north and the south were violating the Constitutions. The government needed to be redone at that moment. But greed and power were winning, and the shadow of titles and names and fictitious entities creepy into the mind of man and everyone forgot they were of mankind.

Expand full comment

"needed to be redone" is the type of thing Lenin or Mao might have said of their own government tinkerings. But the South's violation of the Declaration is the root of the evil of the first century and we are indebted to Lincoln for affirming the promise of created equal to abolish slavery then as to abolish abortion now.

Expand full comment
author

There is a disconnect on the phrase "needed to be redone". Revisiting the post, the only part of the government that failed and had no authority was the States of America formed through the Articles of Confederation and the Continental Congress through the 3 Constitutions, and that was funded by the trade activities and the Federation of States. So, power reverts back to the Federation of States known as The United States of America. So, power reverts back to the Congress at the State level and it was their duty to seat a new Continental Congress. It is not the idea of Lenin or Mao. The founders were very smart and set up a method to handle this by the layers of government. Instead, the south formed a separate confederation and the north ignored the fact they had no power and stayed in office under false pretenses. The end result was all the States ended up bankrupt and beholden to outside money and control after the conflicts ceased. The evil perpetrated was putting more value on trade, corporations and plantation owners than on people [in all forms] who actually facilitate the trade. More detail is coming, but the basic foundation was the British government was controlling both sides of the conflict through tariffs, corporate services, naval/maritime dominance, and arming both sides of the conflict in order to bankrupt the nation and get control back through banking and creative laws with word and term manipulation to slowly enslave all people.

Slavery was never abolished. Instead a new form of slavery was created encompassing all of mankind through taking the labour of people and making them pay debts on their own value of their work. The only credit in this world is one's own labour. The gifts of this world are free from Creation. It depends on our labour to make things happen. Yet, today, we as the creditors [because our labour is the only thing of true compensated value] were flipped into debtors by hypothecation under the guise of rights and privileges.

All of mankind is created equal. The rights of one man extend to where the rights of another man begins. That man's rights extend to where your rights begin. All the rights in the world belong to each of mankind as long as no harm is caused to another of mankind. Rights end when harm [not injury - as that is what happens to things] occurs to one of mankind.

Expand full comment
author

14th Amendment "citizen of the United States" is a "person" with little to no rights except what the government says you have. People were slowly converted from people on the land and soil to fictitious entities through the "transmitting" of the "vitals" through the "informants" (who are the parents) and sent to the county to create a registration (not a record) and then a certificate making a man a paper "person" who is "dead-lost-at-sea" and after 7 years becomes property of the federal government. All due to the 14th Amendment and the "Hospital's and Physician's Handbook on Birth Registration and Fetal Death Reporting" last updated in 1987 and originally commissioned by the Department of Commerce in 1910 under the book name of “Physicians' Pocket Reference to the International List of Causes of Death” which stated the purpose as "Value to Individuals - The primary function of the registration system is to obtain and preserve such documentary evidence concerning births and deaths as is necessary to protect the legal rights of individuals . Though valuable, the production of statistics is of secondary importance."

The definition of "individual" is "included" in the list of "person" as being a corporation, co-partnership, association, franchise and other fictitious entities. The 14th amendment did not free people. It enslaved them into a fictitious entity category and made the control of all rights in this category held by the government - not by the people.

Whereas:

"Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability." U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).

"The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to... I take leave to say that, if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system will result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism... It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside the Supreme Law of the Land finds lodgment in our Constitutional Jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution." --Honorable Supreme Court Justice John Harlan in the 1901 case of Downes v. Bidwell.

“there is in our Political System, a government of each of the several states and a government of the United States. Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own.” US v Cruikshank. 92 US 542.

"Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens." Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.

U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States (this means 14th amendment citizen) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress."

“One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy V Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443.” McDonel v State. 90 Ind. Rep. 320 at pg 323;

“There is a clear distinction between national citizenship and state citizenship.” 256 P. 545. Affirmed 278 US 123, Tashiro v Jordan

"The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship." Jones v Temmer. 89 F. Supp 1226

“Citizenship of the United States does not entitle citizens to privileges and immunities of Citizens of the State, since privileges of one are not the same as the other” Tashiro v Jordan May 20, 1927, 255 P. 545 Ca. Supreme Court.

"A citizen of the United States is a citizen (14th amendment citizen) of the federal government ..." Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383

"Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens." Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.

“… the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal constitution against the powers of the Federal Government.” Maxwell v Dow. 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 455.

State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: "the term 'citizen' in the United States, (means United States citizen or legal fiction) is analogous to the term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."

“The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States,” US v Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957 [“This is the legal fiction citizen of the federal corporation”]

“It is however, true that in all common-law countries it has always and consistently been held that the wife and minor children take the nationality of the husband and father. That is common-law doctrine.” In Re Page 12 F (2d) 135

The Amendment (14th) recognized that "an individual can be a Citizen of one of the several states without being a citizen of the United States," (U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830), or, "a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a state." (Slaughter-House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)). (Again talking about a 14th amendment citizen)

Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says: "Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state." Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.(confusing, but recognizes State citizenship)

"Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability." U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).

"There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state". (Again making a distinction between a 14th amendment citizen and a State Citizen) Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)

"The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other". Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)

"...rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship". Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)

"There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States (14th amendment citizen) as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such". Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)

"Therefore, the U.S. citizens (citizen of the federal corporation) residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity"", Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773

"...the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state action by the privilege and immunities clause [of the 14th Amendment]." Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520

"The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment." Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99

"The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States." W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452

“A “US Citizen” (citizen of the federal corporation) upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)

Expand full comment

Really read more and open your eyes. Stop believing the BS about that conflict and the BS about how great Lincoln was.

Expand full comment
author

Lincoln was not great. All part of the setup. It was a commercial mercenary conflict between two sets of federal military groups. Marshall law was set, and has been ever since in military district courts of sea jurisdiction.

Expand full comment