Then send a notice requiring their sworn affidavit and a FOIA demand for proof of contractual arrangement that proves said presumption. Demand for affidavit as follows:
AFFIDAVIT DEMAND FOR JURISDICTION, FRAUDULENT CONVERSION, AND SECURITIES VIOLATIONS
AT THE [COURT NAME] COURT OF [JURISDICTION] ON SPECIAL VISITATION
ON THE MATTER OF:
[MAN/WOMAN'S NAME], a man/woman
One who notices and demands full disclosure
________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT DEMAND FOR JURISDICTION, FRAUDULENT CONVERSION, AND SECURITIES VIOLATIONS
TO: [Judge's Name], one who sometimes acts as a judicial officer
AND TO: [Attorney's Name], one who sometimes acts as legal counsel
AND TO: Any and all Principals, Agents, and Agencies attempting to impose statutory jurisdiction without full disclosure
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT, NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
________________________________________
I. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF JURISDICTION
1. Provide sworn affidavit verifying under penalty of perjury:
o The exact jurisdiction this court is operating under.
o Whether this court is an administrative, admiralty, maritime, equity, or common law court.
o Whether this proceeding involves statutory jurisdiction and, if so, what authority confers jurisdiction over a man/woman.
o The statutory definition of "Defendant" and "Plaintiff" in relation to a man/woman.
2. Provide the contract, agreement, or document that proves this court has personal jurisdiction over a man or woman without consent.
3. Clarify whether this court recognizes a man or woman as distinct from a statutory "person," "natural person," or "individual."
4. Provide sworn testimony that this proceeding is not operating under a hidden contract or commercial jurisdiction.
________________________________________
II. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF FRAUDULENT CONVERSION
5. Provide the legal basis for converting a man or woman into a corporate entity, legal fiction, or statutory person without full disclosure.
6. Disclose whether any agency, judge, or attorney has assumed or presumed that I, a man/woman, am a corporate entity.
7. Provide documentation proving that I was informed, fully disclosed, and voluntarily consented to be bound under statutory jurisdiction.
8. If no such contract exists, confirm in affidavit form that this court has no authority over a man/woman absent consent.
________________________________________
III. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES VIOLATIONS
9. Provide full accounting and disclosure of any and all securities created in relation to this case under UCC Articles 8 & 9 and SEC Rule 10b-5.
10. Provide documentation that this case number has not been monetized, securitized, or otherwise converted into a financial instrument.
11. Clarify whether any bond, trust, or financial obligation has been issued in connection with this proceeding.
12. Provide proof that I, a man/woman, am not being unlawfully treated as a financial instrument for the benefit of this court, attorneys, or other entities.
________________________________________
IV. NOTICE OF FRAUD AND MAXIM OF LAW
13. Failure to rebut this affidavit point-for-point within ten (10) days shall constitute full agreement and tacit acquiescence that:
• No lawful jurisdiction exists.
• This court is fraudulently converting a man or woman into a corporate fiction.
• Securities fraud is taking place in relation to this case.
• All actions taken under false jurisdiction are void ab initio.
14. Further actions by this court without full disclosure shall be construed as willful fraud, misrepresentation, and obstruction of justice.
15. Any party failing to rebut these demands shall be held personally liable and may be subject to criminal referral under:
• 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 1342 – Mail fraud and fictitious service fraud.
In addition, the rebuttal to "sovereign citizen" presumption:
The Only Official Use of “Sovereign Citizen” is in Reference to U.S. Citizens
• The House Joint Resolution of May 3, 1940 explicitly links the phrase “sovereign citizens” to citizens of the United States, emphasizing their responsibilities within the federal system.
• It is clear that this reference does not relate to men or women of mankind outside the jurisdiction of a federal citizen or statutory resident.
• If a man or woman has formally rebutted any presumption of U.S. citizenship, then courts using this term would be making a false designation.
The Slaughter-House Cases (83 U.S. 36, 1873) and Dual Citizenship
• The Slaughter-House Cases confirm that there is a distinction between state citizens (of one of the several states) and federal citizens (citizens of the United States).
• The case makes it clear that citizenship of the United States is a privilege, not a right and is distinct from those who are simply members of the republic without being statutory citizens.
• If one is not a U.S. citizen, then being called a sovereign citizen (a term applied only to U.S. citizens in the 1940 resolution) would be a false designation.
If One is Not a “Sovereign Citizen” (as Defined in 1940), How Can the Court Use the Label?
• If the only legal definition of "sovereign citizen" applies to citizens of the United States under the 1940 House Joint Resolution, then anyone who has rebutted that status cannot legally be accused of it.
• If a court or law enforcement labels a man as a sovereign citizen despite lawful rebuttal, they are engaging in:
o False claims
o Defamation
o Color of law abuse (18 U.S.C. § 242 - Deprivation of Rights)
o Fraudulent misrepresentation of status
• Such a designation would be a fraudulent legal construct, and it should be challenged at every opportunity.
This is an option i, have seen and i, do not have a strong aversion other than it does represent royalty. Even royalty is a title and are still only of mankind. Red is the land and soil jurisdiction where all men start and end up. Even burial at sea has land under it to hold up the water.
Thank you. It's horrible they have us in a lethal predicament when it's all an illusion! But it's about force for sure they have order followers who are willing to kill fellow man. Take that! They are not fellow man they are monsters. Thanks for your wonderful research and writing! Loved your prior one how they use their fucking title for entrapment!
Quite welcome. Titles are the trap. That is why the founding men of America were so against titles of nobility. What they either did not realize or were not prepared to explain to mankind at that time, was that ANY title is a trap, diminishment, and a lie. The definition of title is a mark. Yet, we all take on the mark. We all want to be something else when we "grow up". It is so much better to be the seed of consciousness and experience whatever we want as long as it causes no harm to another of mankind.
Yup all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath. "i" = self government. "Am" = biological "means of transport" for my foreign government.
18 U.S. Code § 112 - Protection of foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons -
(a) Whoever assaults, strikes, wounds, imprisons, or offers violence to a foreign official, official guest, or internationally protected person or makes any other violent attack upon the person or liberty of such person, or, if likely to endanger his person or liberty, makes a violent attack upon his official premises, private accommodation, or means of transport or attempts to commit any of the foregoing shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Whoever in the commission of any such act uses a deadly or dangerous weapon, or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(c) For the purpose of this section “foreign government”, “foreign official”, “internationally protected person”, “international organization”, “national of the United States”, and “official guest” shall have the same meanings as those provided in section 1116(b) of this title .
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
This is also the deception of the "selective service" enrollment of a newly 18-year-old. They have no idea they are committing to be "in actual service" to the government the moment they sign that form. Another educational system sorcery. Hence, giving up life and limb at the whim of the government masters. That is why completing a baby deed (for any son or daughter who has inadvertently been subjected to the birth certificate scam) and not signing the selective service document is very important. All these agreements create plausible deniability on the side of the government and their masters while we agree to our ineptitude. All while this deception is shrouded under "patriotism". Then once back from service, and you start to see the deception, patriotism is now inverted into a "terroristic" act by media.
All capitalizing on our lack of knowledge or awareness of "i am".
Unfortunately, as soon as our public servants see a thumbprint they are instructed to diminish your documents to the likes of a "sovereign citizen".
Then send a notice requiring their sworn affidavit and a FOIA demand for proof of contractual arrangement that proves said presumption. Demand for affidavit as follows:
AFFIDAVIT DEMAND FOR JURISDICTION, FRAUDULENT CONVERSION, AND SECURITIES VIOLATIONS
AT THE [COURT NAME] COURT OF [JURISDICTION] ON SPECIAL VISITATION
ON THE MATTER OF:
[MAN/WOMAN'S NAME], a man/woman
One who notices and demands full disclosure
________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT DEMAND FOR JURISDICTION, FRAUDULENT CONVERSION, AND SECURITIES VIOLATIONS
TO: [Judge's Name], one who sometimes acts as a judicial officer
AND TO: [Attorney's Name], one who sometimes acts as legal counsel
AND TO: Any and all Principals, Agents, and Agencies attempting to impose statutory jurisdiction without full disclosure
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT, NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
________________________________________
I. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF JURISDICTION
1. Provide sworn affidavit verifying under penalty of perjury:
o The exact jurisdiction this court is operating under.
o Whether this court is an administrative, admiralty, maritime, equity, or common law court.
o Whether this proceeding involves statutory jurisdiction and, if so, what authority confers jurisdiction over a man/woman.
o The statutory definition of "Defendant" and "Plaintiff" in relation to a man/woman.
2. Provide the contract, agreement, or document that proves this court has personal jurisdiction over a man or woman without consent.
3. Clarify whether this court recognizes a man or woman as distinct from a statutory "person," "natural person," or "individual."
4. Provide sworn testimony that this proceeding is not operating under a hidden contract or commercial jurisdiction.
________________________________________
II. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF FRAUDULENT CONVERSION
5. Provide the legal basis for converting a man or woman into a corporate entity, legal fiction, or statutory person without full disclosure.
6. Disclose whether any agency, judge, or attorney has assumed or presumed that I, a man/woman, am a corporate entity.
7. Provide documentation proving that I was informed, fully disclosed, and voluntarily consented to be bound under statutory jurisdiction.
8. If no such contract exists, confirm in affidavit form that this court has no authority over a man/woman absent consent.
________________________________________
III. DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES VIOLATIONS
9. Provide full accounting and disclosure of any and all securities created in relation to this case under UCC Articles 8 & 9 and SEC Rule 10b-5.
10. Provide documentation that this case number has not been monetized, securitized, or otherwise converted into a financial instrument.
11. Clarify whether any bond, trust, or financial obligation has been issued in connection with this proceeding.
12. Provide proof that I, a man/woman, am not being unlawfully treated as a financial instrument for the benefit of this court, attorneys, or other entities.
________________________________________
IV. NOTICE OF FRAUD AND MAXIM OF LAW
13. Failure to rebut this affidavit point-for-point within ten (10) days shall constitute full agreement and tacit acquiescence that:
• No lawful jurisdiction exists.
• This court is fraudulently converting a man or woman into a corporate fiction.
• Securities fraud is taking place in relation to this case.
• All actions taken under false jurisdiction are void ab initio.
14. Further actions by this court without full disclosure shall be construed as willful fraud, misrepresentation, and obstruction of justice.
15. Any party failing to rebut these demands shall be held personally liable and may be subject to criminal referral under:
• 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 & 1342 – Mail fraud and fictitious service fraud.
• 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 & 242 – Conspiracy against rights.
• 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 & 1985 – Deprivation of rights under color of law.
• UCC 1-305 – Remedies to be liberally administered to prevent injustice.
________________________________________
V. FINAL DECLARATION & NOTICE OF DEFAULT
WHEREFORE, it is hereby ordered and commanded that:
1. All points above be fully disclosed in sworn affidavit within ten (10) days.
2. Failure to respond shall constitute agreement and acceptance that fraud has occurred.
3. All fraudulent securities transactions tied to this case must be disclosed, audited, and nullified.
4. Any financial gains made through fraudulent bonds or case securitization must be returned with triple damages as provided under UCC 1-305.
5. Any court, attorney, or agent failing to comply will be reported for professional and criminal misconduct.
Dated: [DATE]
By: ______________________________________________©™
Without Recourse All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice
[Your Given and Family Name]
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT, NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
In addition, the rebuttal to "sovereign citizen" presumption:
The Only Official Use of “Sovereign Citizen” is in Reference to U.S. Citizens
• The House Joint Resolution of May 3, 1940 explicitly links the phrase “sovereign citizens” to citizens of the United States, emphasizing their responsibilities within the federal system.
• It is clear that this reference does not relate to men or women of mankind outside the jurisdiction of a federal citizen or statutory resident.
• If a man or woman has formally rebutted any presumption of U.S. citizenship, then courts using this term would be making a false designation.
The Slaughter-House Cases (83 U.S. 36, 1873) and Dual Citizenship
• The Slaughter-House Cases confirm that there is a distinction between state citizens (of one of the several states) and federal citizens (citizens of the United States).
• The case makes it clear that citizenship of the United States is a privilege, not a right and is distinct from those who are simply members of the republic without being statutory citizens.
• If one is not a U.S. citizen, then being called a sovereign citizen (a term applied only to U.S. citizens in the 1940 resolution) would be a false designation.
If One is Not a “Sovereign Citizen” (as Defined in 1940), How Can the Court Use the Label?
• If the only legal definition of "sovereign citizen" applies to citizens of the United States under the 1940 House Joint Resolution, then anyone who has rebutted that status cannot legally be accused of it.
• If a court or law enforcement labels a man as a sovereign citizen despite lawful rebuttal, they are engaging in:
o False claims
o Defamation
o Color of law abuse (18 U.S.C. § 242 - Deprivation of Rights)
o Fraudulent misrepresentation of status
• Such a designation would be a fraudulent legal construct, and it should be challenged at every opportunity.
Thoughts using purple representing royalty/authority on docs to their commercial narrative?
This is an option i, have seen and i, do not have a strong aversion other than it does represent royalty. Even royalty is a title and are still only of mankind. Red is the land and soil jurisdiction where all men start and end up. Even burial at sea has land under it to hold up the water.
Thank you. It's horrible they have us in a lethal predicament when it's all an illusion! But it's about force for sure they have order followers who are willing to kill fellow man. Take that! They are not fellow man they are monsters. Thanks for your wonderful research and writing! Loved your prior one how they use their fucking title for entrapment!
Quite welcome. Titles are the trap. That is why the founding men of America were so against titles of nobility. What they either did not realize or were not prepared to explain to mankind at that time, was that ANY title is a trap, diminishment, and a lie. The definition of title is a mark. Yet, we all take on the mark. We all want to be something else when we "grow up". It is so much better to be the seed of consciousness and experience whatever we want as long as it causes no harm to another of mankind.
Yup all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath. "i" = self government. "Am" = biological "means of transport" for my foreign government.
18 U.S. Code § 112 - Protection of foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons -
(a) Whoever assaults, strikes, wounds, imprisons, or offers violence to a foreign official, official guest, or internationally protected person or makes any other violent attack upon the person or liberty of such person, or, if likely to endanger his person or liberty, makes a violent attack upon his official premises, private accommodation, or means of transport or attempts to commit any of the foregoing shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Whoever in the commission of any such act uses a deadly or dangerous weapon, or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/112
internationally protected person
(c) For the purpose of this section “foreign government”, “foreign official”, “internationally protected person”, “international organization”, “national of the United States”, and “official guest” shall have the same meanings as those provided in section 1116(b) of this title .
Present - "now existing or in progress"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/present
Amputate - "to remove by or as if by cutting - especially : to cut (a part, such as a limb) from the body
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amputate
Limb - "the expanded portion of an organ or structure"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limb
"life or limb"
Constitution of the United States
Fifth Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-5/
double jeopardy
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/double_jeopardy
This is also the deception of the "selective service" enrollment of a newly 18-year-old. They have no idea they are committing to be "in actual service" to the government the moment they sign that form. Another educational system sorcery. Hence, giving up life and limb at the whim of the government masters. That is why completing a baby deed (for any son or daughter who has inadvertently been subjected to the birth certificate scam) and not signing the selective service document is very important. All these agreements create plausible deniability on the side of the government and their masters while we agree to our ineptitude. All while this deception is shrouded under "patriotism". Then once back from service, and you start to see the deception, patriotism is now inverted into a "terroristic" act by media.
All capitalizing on our lack of knowledge or awareness of "i am".