Love this, the government does not determine or bestow rights, if they do then they are privileges not rights. Only two classes of people have privileges children or slaves. Pick which you are as their are no other choices.
Germane to whatever time unveils of any predecessors writ, may wisdom find honor lighting good will seeking paths of eternal peace, in service of honor above all else, forevermore..
NOW, for this missive respective to Anna Reitz and such ilk.
Remember, all attorning malefactors' however illusionary, are to be avoided by all-fathers godsons & goddaughters fearfully and wonderfully made in "Normal Law" honor for honor. Any so-called World Service Authority and else-wise, are no better that corporate shills for the same pettifoggery of religious money-mongers long afoot, consider:
To all walks of life seeking good Will honor for honor in magistrates else-wiser…lol.
"When the Revolution took place the people of each State became themselves sovereign: Martin et al v, The Lessee of Waddell, (1842) 41 U.S. (16 Pet) 367, 410, 10 L. Ed 997, 1013).
For introductory perspective, here's a question: May the "created" tell the "creator" what to disclose or when?
Here's the translation: "Secrecy" is the cover story for "immunity" as in "sovereign immunity." See: FSIA.
Bank “secrecy” tells the observant – what they need to know. [Title 31 USC 5318(g)(3)]
“The words “sovereign state” are cabalistic words, not understood by the disciple of liberty, who has been instructed in our constitutional schools. It is our appropriate phrase when applied to an absolute despotism. The idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property. Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501.
Consider how Man triangulates reality fearfully & wonderfully made in all-fathers image & likeness by Nature’s Law & Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason as godsons & goddaughters, in-law:
Long ago, uncovered an ancient attorning scheme by money-mongers to use religion and jurisdictional Staples via Stile-gates to deceive via social role models most historically are socially engineered to prepare all for voluntary slavery none ‘normal’ can discern.
So, if you want to be free, first you must be ‘normal.’
Then, live by ‘Normal Law.”
All other laws (Common [land] Law or Law-Merchant/Maritime Law) is in suzerainty to “Normal Law.”
Creation exists because of “Normal Law.” Any who seek else-wise, faces oblivion!
The Triple Tiara or 3 Crowns of popery institutionalized commercial religion or corporate states currently recognize only One man as “Normal” upon which all other life must be subjected to, that are beguiled into believing such pettifoggery.
Again, the 3 Crowns:
1st & highest Law: Normal Law (dominion by divine providence and imbued honor for honor).
2nd Law in Suzerainty to “Normal Law”: Common Law (of the land).
3rd & in Suzerainty to “Normal Law”: Maritime Law (Merchant).
For those good people of united America wishing to live honor for honor via variation by agreement, it is ‘Normal Law” that serves every Joint Tenant in the Sovereignty of Creation.
It is this “normalcy in-law” that all walks of life seeking good will, honor for honor via Nature’s Law & Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason, are soundly anchored and peacefully landmarked for all seeking safe harbor.
Be wise, safe & blessed,
All-fathers godson & sovereign witness of the good people of united America exercising joint dominion of eternal creation, with all walks of life seeking service in honor above all else, forevermore
Normal law. A term employed by modern writers on jurisprudence to denote the law as it affects persons who are in a normal condition; i.e., sui juris and sound in mind.
Hello, Please correct me if i am missing the point of your passionate opinion about "Anna Reitz and such ilk": Having studied Anna and many others over the last 8 years or so: a) i don't think she would disagree with your general sentiment re: "Created vs. Creator". b) Neither Anna nor The Living Law firm made-up her Political Status Correction process but brought it forward - from seemingly very well hidden archives. c) While it seems 100 percent accurate that "When the Revolution took place the people of each State became themselves sovereign..."; In the Status Correction Paperwork, this same idea is brought forward through a State's Session Law - for example California's Session Law says (paraphrasing): "The people of California do not give up their Sovereignty to the Government that serves them." So, the entire point of Anna's work is to peel back the deception (e.g. "JUSTINIAN DECEPTION") of THE STATE (a Babylonian Artifact). It's the CORPORATE "DeFacto" Government that re-defined words like "Person" back around 1864. This same Evil entity separated the birthright of "people" through the unlawful conversion to "U.S. citizen" and "Citizen of the United States" via the Birth Certificate Registration process. That's my perspective anyway. Thanks for your writings - much appreciated.
The paperwork is simply an evidence correction. As you mention, the deception is "unveiled" by correcting the record. We have been tricked into agreements and false evidence. In reality, the only "new identities" created were the proxies through the "paper things" process of the infiltrated evil. By recording our living soul sovereign status, it cuts through the lies and puts it on record. It documents the awareness of the false registrations and licensing and adhesion contracts. It provides footing for lawful redress. We never lost our identity. The paperwork simply corrects the record.
With a proper notice process, you can come forward as a man at any time without all the status corrections. But, the status correction provides evidence. And if one were to present at court, evidence is important.
While i certainly agree with your insightful point: "We never lost our identity. The paperwork simply corrects the record."; some of the fundamental issues of whether or not to study/execute Anna's processes is "Whether or Not the DeFacto Government will honor your true identity if 'YOU' (ALL CAPS CORPORATE ENTITY) remain inside of THEIR databases?" and "Whether or Not you; man, are educated enough to stand-up for your unalienable (God-given) rights when dragged into THEIR Foreign For-Profit COURT[, Inc.] (a BANK in reality)?". Many times, a Court Clerk will admit that a SUMMONS was sent because the ALL CAPS NAME; the CORPORATE identity, is either inside of the IRS, DMV, or VOTER databases. Thanks again for the clarifications. :)
The knowledge is a challenge. There is an intentional gap in education. The only visible "law" ever taught to us, in the last 3-4 generations, has been Maritime/Admiralty "legal fiction". We have been intentionally deprived of common law, natural law and trust law.
So, let's take a walk down the experience lane. i, will keep this as short as possible as the details are quite extensive...
i, have successfully executed numerous series of rejections of service and notices for various topics over the last 3 years. The notices were for time-shares ["they attempt to keep you locked in forever"]; two lawyers from large multi-state firms from NJ, NY, PA, and DE; from previous partners of a business who leveraged kindness to attempt to steal what was owned through coercion, extortion, false witness, barratry, and a few other grievous trespasses; rejection of marriage license and correcting lawful marriage; rejection of paperwork for property taxes due to confusing language, lack of definitions, misaddress, and lack of proof of higher title. In total, i have spent about $400 in postage fees and my time. No traitorous bastard "practicing" law was used.
i, performed return service, rejected their misaddress, gave them an opportunity to provide affidavits of rebuttal, put them on notice, and put the district attorney, the lawyers and those of mankind who do trespass in default.
i, am about to serve notice to the Chairman and CEO of a large bank and a local bank branch manager for theft of funds, and trespass on the property of i. i, intend to do this through the county Sheriff who i, am fairly certain will act "de facto" rather than "de jure". i, will have a notice ready for him as well if he chooses to support the corporation over the people and break the public trust. Then it will be calling out the Oath of Office, Oath of Fidelity, bond number and carrier of the bond as well verification of his letter of marque and affirmation to serve the public and uphold the public trust.
The unfortunate reality is this takes time, study, effort, and a willingness to learn AND execute what is learned.
That is what this Substack is about... i, am slow walking history and information to the masses to help them at least try to understand what i, have learned after living through the attempts of others of mankind to do harm.
i, am attempting to provide more references and links and definitions so people can grasp the fraud.
Take a look at "Expressing Law by Giving Notice" as it contains an example of a memorandum related to property taxes. This is simply one of three notices with memorandums with different details. https://shirenews.substack.com/p/expressing-law-by-giving-notice
It takes time, and every notice is uniquely yours. But, the important point is that it all comes down to evidence and agreements.
Thanks for sharing - i thoroughly enjoyed reading about your experiences. If memory serves, the whole "i: man" strategy started with Karl Lentz (https://theloresociety.com/); at least that was my introduction in ~ 2015/16 or so. i have similar experiences with various categories of trespass upon my private property; including the typical creation of fictitious debt. However, i have also seen men and women fail from the aforementioned lack of education and experience using these strategies...including, but not limited to, Notices of Liability; certain forms of Equity law; the UCC Secured Party Creditor stuff; and just about anything from "YouTube University". i believe that we "man" have a duty to bring forward the best strategies - based upon experiential successes. Thanks again and many Blessings to you and yours, john. [Edited to fix typo]
I contacted Bailiwick (sp) I was sent to you. May I have a conversation? 503 641 8375
Reverse engineer this.
We need to restore law as defined by the Declaration of Independence , the Confederation and perpetual Union’s Articles one of which is The United States of America’s Constitution circa 1859-60 including 13 lawful Amendments the last ratified 1819; 33 States among the several states. Statutes at Large and treaties.
The SAL of 1858 was written after Grant and Lee signed an armistice. It that moment the fix was in.
The Treaty of Paris is fraud on the first page. Therefore, the Northwest Ordinance is suspect. However, Ohio and Canada are defined Others too.
The several states or commonwealths all have Constitutions and Statehood Documents that must contain the State’s accepted Constitution and a valid The United States of America’s Constitution at minimum. Just attempt to obtain a certified copy.
This year in Philadelphia.
We had a de jure Constitutional Republican form of government on the 33 states and commonwealths 1859-60. We lost South Carolina in 1860. So to restore South Carolina to The United States of America is a goal.
We lost the color of law Confederation and perpetual Union aka The United States of America March 1861. To restore a de jure Constitutional Republican form of government. We need to meet in Congress Assembled in Philadelphia this year 2023.
For a Congress to assembly we must have delegates with bonafides from the several states. We get our delegates with bona fides through Article I Section 1 all power is inherent in the people using Full Faith and Credit, To remove Martial law/Liber code still in effect with the US Army 2015, no known updates. The de facto removal of martial law is with ex parte Milligan’s Civilian court. So, we know how to make a court.
To lawfully remove the de facto on Oregon we needed a Grand Jury and trial jury pool. Then we needed Presentments for the de facto and True Bills for Article III one supreme Court claiming original jurisdiction. That Court is found in Amendment VII whose jury verdict has no appeal in law. We removed the de facto executive. Legislative, judicial of ARTICLE VII (Amended0 (Original) on Oregon 2022.
Here is the thought for the leaders and the congregations of the Christian Community. My oldest daughter said even if he did break his oath—he did more good than bad. To give your sacred word and break it –is not good.
The current de facto, unlawful, illegal, illegitimate, incorporated governance in Salem all three , Executive such as kate Brown, Tina Kptek, Shemia Fagan, Ellen and more; Legislatively 89 Legislators met when men and women were locked out. Mike Nearman opened the door. Guilty of breaking their oath. The Judiciary on Oregon has been unable to be de jure as the system is de facto from November 8, 1910 the only Constitution available is bogus. And they all know it. All were Abolished Constitutionally 2022
The believers in Christ, Jesus in Spanish and English, various other words denote the same God. There are Churches worshipping and are registered supporters of the Salem oligarchy that is a de facto State of Oregon aka STATE OF OREGON a sub division of the United States of Washington District of Columbia martial law/Lieber code/FEMA. Once you are no longer deceived then the fraud of the de facto is obvious and the expatriate to the de jure jurisdiction
Thank you. I appreciate the correction. Inadvertent typo. I tend to muscle memory type the same thing wrong repeatedly after I do it once.
"Erie Railroad v. Thompkins" is actually "Erie Railroad v. Tompkins." Now you'll be able to find it more readily; e.g., https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/304/64
Love this, the government does not determine or bestow rights, if they do then they are privileges not rights. Only two classes of people have privileges children or slaves. Pick which you are as their are no other choices.
Germane to whatever time unveils of any predecessors writ, may wisdom find honor lighting good will seeking paths of eternal peace, in service of honor above all else, forevermore..
NOW, for this missive respective to Anna Reitz and such ilk.
Remember, all attorning malefactors' however illusionary, are to be avoided by all-fathers godsons & goddaughters fearfully and wonderfully made in "Normal Law" honor for honor. Any so-called World Service Authority and else-wise, are no better that corporate shills for the same pettifoggery of religious money-mongers long afoot, consider:
To all walks of life seeking good Will honor for honor in magistrates else-wiser…lol.
"When the Revolution took place the people of each State became themselves sovereign: Martin et al v, The Lessee of Waddell, (1842) 41 U.S. (16 Pet) 367, 410, 10 L. Ed 997, 1013).
For introductory perspective, here's a question: May the "created" tell the "creator" what to disclose or when?
Here's the translation: "Secrecy" is the cover story for "immunity" as in "sovereign immunity." See: FSIA.
Bank “secrecy” tells the observant – what they need to know. [Title 31 USC 5318(g)(3)]
“The words “sovereign state” are cabalistic words, not understood by the disciple of liberty, who has been instructed in our constitutional schools. It is our appropriate phrase when applied to an absolute despotism. The idea of sovereign power in the government of a republic is incompatible with the existence and foundation of civil liberty and the rights of property. Gaines v. Buford, 31 Ky. (1 Dana) 481, 501.
Consider how Man triangulates reality fearfully & wonderfully made in all-fathers image & likeness by Nature’s Law & Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason as godsons & goddaughters, in-law:
Long ago, uncovered an ancient attorning scheme by money-mongers to use religion and jurisdictional Staples via Stile-gates to deceive via social role models most historically are socially engineered to prepare all for voluntary slavery none ‘normal’ can discern.
So, if you want to be free, first you must be ‘normal.’
Then, live by ‘Normal Law.”
All other laws (Common [land] Law or Law-Merchant/Maritime Law) is in suzerainty to “Normal Law.”
Creation exists because of “Normal Law.” Any who seek else-wise, faces oblivion!
The Triple Tiara or 3 Crowns of popery institutionalized commercial religion or corporate states currently recognize only One man as “Normal” upon which all other life must be subjected to, that are beguiled into believing such pettifoggery.
Again, the 3 Crowns:
1st & highest Law: Normal Law (dominion by divine providence and imbued honor for honor).
2nd Law in Suzerainty to “Normal Law”: Common Law (of the land).
3rd & in Suzerainty to “Normal Law”: Maritime Law (Merchant).
For those good people of united America wishing to live honor for honor via variation by agreement, it is ‘Normal Law” that serves every Joint Tenant in the Sovereignty of Creation.
It is this “normalcy in-law” that all walks of life seeking good will, honor for honor via Nature’s Law & Nature’s (Creator/Creative) Science of Right Reason, are soundly anchored and peacefully landmarked for all seeking safe harbor.
Be wise, safe & blessed,
All-fathers godson & sovereign witness of the good people of united America exercising joint dominion of eternal creation, with all walks of life seeking service in honor above all else, forevermore
Normal law. A term employed by modern writers on jurisprudence to denote the law as it affects persons who are in a normal condition; i.e., sui juris and sound in mind.
Hello, Please correct me if i am missing the point of your passionate opinion about "Anna Reitz and such ilk": Having studied Anna and many others over the last 8 years or so: a) i don't think she would disagree with your general sentiment re: "Created vs. Creator". b) Neither Anna nor The Living Law firm made-up her Political Status Correction process but brought it forward - from seemingly very well hidden archives. c) While it seems 100 percent accurate that "When the Revolution took place the people of each State became themselves sovereign..."; In the Status Correction Paperwork, this same idea is brought forward through a State's Session Law - for example California's Session Law says (paraphrasing): "The people of California do not give up their Sovereignty to the Government that serves them." So, the entire point of Anna's work is to peel back the deception (e.g. "JUSTINIAN DECEPTION") of THE STATE (a Babylonian Artifact). It's the CORPORATE "DeFacto" Government that re-defined words like "Person" back around 1864. This same Evil entity separated the birthright of "people" through the unlawful conversion to "U.S. citizen" and "Citizen of the United States" via the Birth Certificate Registration process. That's my perspective anyway. Thanks for your writings - much appreciated.
The paperwork is simply an evidence correction. As you mention, the deception is "unveiled" by correcting the record. We have been tricked into agreements and false evidence. In reality, the only "new identities" created were the proxies through the "paper things" process of the infiltrated evil. By recording our living soul sovereign status, it cuts through the lies and puts it on record. It documents the awareness of the false registrations and licensing and adhesion contracts. It provides footing for lawful redress. We never lost our identity. The paperwork simply corrects the record.
With a proper notice process, you can come forward as a man at any time without all the status corrections. But, the status correction provides evidence. And if one were to present at court, evidence is important.
While i certainly agree with your insightful point: "We never lost our identity. The paperwork simply corrects the record."; some of the fundamental issues of whether or not to study/execute Anna's processes is "Whether or Not the DeFacto Government will honor your true identity if 'YOU' (ALL CAPS CORPORATE ENTITY) remain inside of THEIR databases?" and "Whether or Not you; man, are educated enough to stand-up for your unalienable (God-given) rights when dragged into THEIR Foreign For-Profit COURT[, Inc.] (a BANK in reality)?". Many times, a Court Clerk will admit that a SUMMONS was sent because the ALL CAPS NAME; the CORPORATE identity, is either inside of the IRS, DMV, or VOTER databases. Thanks again for the clarifications. :)
The knowledge is a challenge. There is an intentional gap in education. The only visible "law" ever taught to us, in the last 3-4 generations, has been Maritime/Admiralty "legal fiction". We have been intentionally deprived of common law, natural law and trust law.
So, let's take a walk down the experience lane. i, will keep this as short as possible as the details are quite extensive...
i, have successfully executed numerous series of rejections of service and notices for various topics over the last 3 years. The notices were for time-shares ["they attempt to keep you locked in forever"]; two lawyers from large multi-state firms from NJ, NY, PA, and DE; from previous partners of a business who leveraged kindness to attempt to steal what was owned through coercion, extortion, false witness, barratry, and a few other grievous trespasses; rejection of marriage license and correcting lawful marriage; rejection of paperwork for property taxes due to confusing language, lack of definitions, misaddress, and lack of proof of higher title. In total, i have spent about $400 in postage fees and my time. No traitorous bastard "practicing" law was used.
i, performed return service, rejected their misaddress, gave them an opportunity to provide affidavits of rebuttal, put them on notice, and put the district attorney, the lawyers and those of mankind who do trespass in default.
i, am about to serve notice to the Chairman and CEO of a large bank and a local bank branch manager for theft of funds, and trespass on the property of i. i, intend to do this through the county Sheriff who i, am fairly certain will act "de facto" rather than "de jure". i, will have a notice ready for him as well if he chooses to support the corporation over the people and break the public trust. Then it will be calling out the Oath of Office, Oath of Fidelity, bond number and carrier of the bond as well verification of his letter of marque and affirmation to serve the public and uphold the public trust.
The unfortunate reality is this takes time, study, effort, and a willingness to learn AND execute what is learned.
That is what this Substack is about... i, am slow walking history and information to the masses to help them at least try to understand what i, have learned after living through the attempts of others of mankind to do harm.
i, am attempting to provide more references and links and definitions so people can grasp the fraud.
Take a look at "Expressing Law by Giving Notice" as it contains an example of a memorandum related to property taxes. This is simply one of three notices with memorandums with different details. https://shirenews.substack.com/p/expressing-law-by-giving-notice
It takes time, and every notice is uniquely yours. But, the important point is that it all comes down to evidence and agreements.
Thanks for sharing - i thoroughly enjoyed reading about your experiences. If memory serves, the whole "i: man" strategy started with Karl Lentz (https://theloresociety.com/); at least that was my introduction in ~ 2015/16 or so. i have similar experiences with various categories of trespass upon my private property; including the typical creation of fictitious debt. However, i have also seen men and women fail from the aforementioned lack of education and experience using these strategies...including, but not limited to, Notices of Liability; certain forms of Equity law; the UCC Secured Party Creditor stuff; and just about anything from "YouTube University". i believe that we "man" have a duty to bring forward the best strategies - based upon experiential successes. Thanks again and many Blessings to you and yours, john. [Edited to fix typo]
I contacted Bailiwick (sp) I was sent to you. May I have a conversation? 503 641 8375
Reverse engineer this.
We need to restore law as defined by the Declaration of Independence , the Confederation and perpetual Union’s Articles one of which is The United States of America’s Constitution circa 1859-60 including 13 lawful Amendments the last ratified 1819; 33 States among the several states. Statutes at Large and treaties.
The SAL of 1858 was written after Grant and Lee signed an armistice. It that moment the fix was in.
The Treaty of Paris is fraud on the first page. Therefore, the Northwest Ordinance is suspect. However, Ohio and Canada are defined Others too.
The several states or commonwealths all have Constitutions and Statehood Documents that must contain the State’s accepted Constitution and a valid The United States of America’s Constitution at minimum. Just attempt to obtain a certified copy.
This year in Philadelphia.
We had a de jure Constitutional Republican form of government on the 33 states and commonwealths 1859-60. We lost South Carolina in 1860. So to restore South Carolina to The United States of America is a goal.
We lost the color of law Confederation and perpetual Union aka The United States of America March 1861. To restore a de jure Constitutional Republican form of government. We need to meet in Congress Assembled in Philadelphia this year 2023.
For a Congress to assembly we must have delegates with bonafides from the several states. We get our delegates with bona fides through Article I Section 1 all power is inherent in the people using Full Faith and Credit, To remove Martial law/Liber code still in effect with the US Army 2015, no known updates. The de facto removal of martial law is with ex parte Milligan’s Civilian court. So, we know how to make a court.
To lawfully remove the de facto on Oregon we needed a Grand Jury and trial jury pool. Then we needed Presentments for the de facto and True Bills for Article III one supreme Court claiming original jurisdiction. That Court is found in Amendment VII whose jury verdict has no appeal in law. We removed the de facto executive. Legislative, judicial of ARTICLE VII (Amended0 (Original) on Oregon 2022.
Here is the thought for the leaders and the congregations of the Christian Community. My oldest daughter said even if he did break his oath—he did more good than bad. To give your sacred word and break it –is not good.
The current de facto, unlawful, illegal, illegitimate, incorporated governance in Salem all three , Executive such as kate Brown, Tina Kptek, Shemia Fagan, Ellen and more; Legislatively 89 Legislators met when men and women were locked out. Mike Nearman opened the door. Guilty of breaking their oath. The Judiciary on Oregon has been unable to be de jure as the system is de facto from November 8, 1910 the only Constitution available is bogus. And they all know it. All were Abolished Constitutionally 2022
The believers in Christ, Jesus in Spanish and English, various other words denote the same God. There are Churches worshipping and are registered supporters of the Salem oligarchy that is a de facto State of Oregon aka STATE OF OREGON a sub division of the United States of Washington District of Columbia martial law/Lieber code/FEMA. Once you are no longer deceived then the fraud of the de facto is obvious and the expatriate to the de jure jurisdiction