As all-fathers fearfully & wonderfully godson in image & likeness and sovereign witness of the good people of united America for these United States, harken:
Ye who seek good will by variation of agreement via nature's law & nature's (creator/Creative) science of right reason, in service of honor above all else, honor for honor as Man after Man's own kind, exercise free agency upon purity of law, intent as expressed, in trust eternal.
There are many dimensional realities operating by active camouflage linguistically and to better triangulate One must be Reborn. What is above is so below....
Once One is able to rightly be in a two (2) dimensional reality without being a party thereof, One begins to comprehend "natures" (substance/form) and importance of replevining your "infant decedent" estate vested in interest (implied trust), from your estate name extended "principally" by an informant (your mother) for return of future interest upon maturity of the sole beneficiary and sole owner by nature (Man/Woman).
Presently, two (2) dimensional reality (documents/instruments) arising in trust (implied) and the Westphalian commercial states as acceptor gives/creates a constructive trust to carry out the implied trust from an application made by informant and provides informant a registered instrument to be returned to sole beneficiary at age of majority or else, be presumed dead and property abandoned to the registrar of the state of registration.
These registries are known as 'minor accounts' by said registrars and unless you accept to declare your name, status and (express) trust for public Record (Full faith & credit) such name, status and unqualified "nature' of the beneficiary awaits to be declared thereon.
Once such public Record is sealed thereunder, you are no longer in Oz....lol.
An affirmation by (title 9 USC) arbitration is your final nail in their commercial two-dimensional coffin, that assures your sole proprietorship (Principal) may only communicate through your trustees when respondents are nefarious....lol. By the way, under current national emergency declarations, these trustees are well known by operation of national law extant by presidential proclamation and executive orders since 1933.
But of course, once One replevin/control their estate minor accounts of the infant decedent by proving the sole beneficiary & sole owner by nature from age of majority breaths....lol, all interest & control is taken out of probate (registrar of state is ipso fact a probate judge).
Now, let me see....lol This means we don't have to pay taxes.....lol
Dah....., this means they pay you (Principal/PRINCIPAL) the estate interest due from age of majority for life (until said emergency is lifted) via the envoy/agent/grantee coming as grantor & settler for the sole beneficiary and sole owner by nature (Man/Woman).
Never, never, never forget to qualify your mark....lol
You provided a lot here, thank you. Making effective use of it may be a challenge, even for those somewhat educated.
Most of us with have traffic citations thrown at us, and it would be helpful to have an effective method to dismiss these, as the fees are growing more ridiculous and punitive.
I recently attempted and failed. It was disheartening but educational. Here's the story, perhaps you can point out my flaws?
I received a citation for having 3" of snow on the back of my truck, the charge was $330.
I immediately sent it in via registered mail to the address provided (which wasn't the court, but the State's centralized processing address) and didn't check any pleas but wrote a big "No contract. Do Not Consent" across the back and signed with my initials, agent and wrote "without prejudice, UCC-1-308" under that.
Later I received a letter addressed to the CAPITALIZED NAME, with a notice of hearing by phone. I attended, but did not answer the question to identify myself, and said I was here but special appearance to settle the matter. The prosecutor asked if I was Mr. Surname, and I said my mother calls me Firstname. He proceeded to read the compliant and the charge and asked for my plea. I asked who is the compliantent, and he replied, "the State", I asked who was harmed? He asked for my plea. I asked, "by what jurisdiction do you bring this compliant" and he said, "you presented a driver's license didn't you?". I said, "I did" and he asked for my plea. I repeated the jurisdiction question, and he said "well, I'll take that as a not guilty and see you in court.
Later I received a letter with notice of a trial date, and by registered mail I sent a copy of the citation I had sent in and the registered mail number to the court, along with an affidavit of status and a notice of fees for trespass of rights.
I went to court on the date, and when my name was called, I stood up and stated, "I am here by special appearance to settle this matter", with that the clerk ran out of the room, then came back a minute later. In the meantime, the prosecutor asked if I was NAME, and I didn't respond. The judge came in, called the court to order and read the case, and asked for my NAME. I stood and stated I was here by special appearance to settle this matter. She asked me to take a seat at the defense table, so I crossed the bar and did (potential mistake #1), she asked me to stand and make my plea, and I asked, "by what jurisdiction?"
She said, "Well you are Name?" And I said, "by what authority do you use that name for identification?" "Well, you are here for this compliant, right?" I asked "by what authority do you use that name for identification, I checked with the Department of Vital Records, and they clearly state one may not use this for identification purposes. She paused, the clerk handed her some papers, and she looked up and asked, "You send some paperwork to the court?" "Yes" "And this is signed by you, Firstname Surname?" I replied "Yes, as a man". She looked over to the prosecutor and said, "We shall proceed". (second mistake, agreeing I was "you"?).
They ran through the theater of getting the officer to testify and point me out, I didn't defend, and at the end the prosecutor asked the judge to double the fine and suspend my license for my behavior today in court, to teach me a lesson. She issued a guilty verdict and the original $330 fine plus $100 court fee and suspended my license for 30 days. I asked if she was administrating my trust without my consent, and she replied, "I don't need it." I told her I run a business, and this sentence was an unnecessary hardship, and she said her judgement was final, and to pay the charge at the window.
I would have loved to use my notice of trespass fees against them, but didn't know who or how to file such a compliant.
On a more recent speeding ticket (49 in a 35, downhill, speed trap set-up right at the sign where the limit changes from 50 to 35). I sent the same "No contract" citation back, but when I got the court notice, I just paid the $190 fine, as my time was too valuable to spend another day in court.
I suppose this is how they beat us into submission. My focus now is the "income" tax, which adds up to a lot more.
Thank you Julie. This is great as it defines a "sovereign citizen" within the context of a "citizen of the United States", which is clearly defined in the Slaughter-House Cases. Which is a 14th Amendment citizen. It is a perfect circular trap. It has NOTHING to do with a man or a woman. And, this can be referenced in court or rebuttal documents asking them to define and what is different in this "definition" ["actually a resolution with a reference to something defined within the terms of something else"]. If you have rebutted the presumption and noticed of standing, it is demonstrably true that exercising your rights, this definition does not remotely apply to you. Only applies to the fictitious entity/resident/citizen of the United States/person. Notice the age reference? This also ties to selective service. This proves that they can only be talking about citizens of the United States when using "sovereign citizen" language. This is fantastic proof.
As all-fathers fearfully & wonderfully godson in image & likeness and sovereign witness of the good people of united America for these United States, harken:
Ye who seek good will by variation of agreement via nature's law & nature's (creator/Creative) science of right reason, in service of honor above all else, honor for honor as Man after Man's own kind, exercise free agency upon purity of law, intent as expressed, in trust eternal.
There are many dimensional realities operating by active camouflage linguistically and to better triangulate One must be Reborn. What is above is so below....
Once One is able to rightly be in a two (2) dimensional reality without being a party thereof, One begins to comprehend "natures" (substance/form) and importance of replevining your "infant decedent" estate vested in interest (implied trust), from your estate name extended "principally" by an informant (your mother) for return of future interest upon maturity of the sole beneficiary and sole owner by nature (Man/Woman).
Presently, two (2) dimensional reality (documents/instruments) arising in trust (implied) and the Westphalian commercial states as acceptor gives/creates a constructive trust to carry out the implied trust from an application made by informant and provides informant a registered instrument to be returned to sole beneficiary at age of majority or else, be presumed dead and property abandoned to the registrar of the state of registration.
These registries are known as 'minor accounts' by said registrars and unless you accept to declare your name, status and (express) trust for public Record (Full faith & credit) such name, status and unqualified "nature' of the beneficiary awaits to be declared thereon.
Once such public Record is sealed thereunder, you are no longer in Oz....lol.
An affirmation by (title 9 USC) arbitration is your final nail in their commercial two-dimensional coffin, that assures your sole proprietorship (Principal) may only communicate through your trustees when respondents are nefarious....lol. By the way, under current national emergency declarations, these trustees are well known by operation of national law extant by presidential proclamation and executive orders since 1933.
But of course, once One replevin/control their estate minor accounts of the infant decedent by proving the sole beneficiary & sole owner by nature from age of majority breaths....lol, all interest & control is taken out of probate (registrar of state is ipso fact a probate judge).
Now, let me see....lol This means we don't have to pay taxes.....lol
Dah....., this means they pay you (Principal/PRINCIPAL) the estate interest due from age of majority for life (until said emergency is lifted) via the envoy/agent/grantee coming as grantor & settler for the sole beneficiary and sole owner by nature (Man/Woman).
Never, never, never forget to qualify your mark....lol
Be wise safe & blessed,
Arthur
You provided a lot here, thank you. Making effective use of it may be a challenge, even for those somewhat educated.
Most of us with have traffic citations thrown at us, and it would be helpful to have an effective method to dismiss these, as the fees are growing more ridiculous and punitive.
I recently attempted and failed. It was disheartening but educational. Here's the story, perhaps you can point out my flaws?
I received a citation for having 3" of snow on the back of my truck, the charge was $330.
I immediately sent it in via registered mail to the address provided (which wasn't the court, but the State's centralized processing address) and didn't check any pleas but wrote a big "No contract. Do Not Consent" across the back and signed with my initials, agent and wrote "without prejudice, UCC-1-308" under that.
Later I received a letter addressed to the CAPITALIZED NAME, with a notice of hearing by phone. I attended, but did not answer the question to identify myself, and said I was here but special appearance to settle the matter. The prosecutor asked if I was Mr. Surname, and I said my mother calls me Firstname. He proceeded to read the compliant and the charge and asked for my plea. I asked who is the compliantent, and he replied, "the State", I asked who was harmed? He asked for my plea. I asked, "by what jurisdiction do you bring this compliant" and he said, "you presented a driver's license didn't you?". I said, "I did" and he asked for my plea. I repeated the jurisdiction question, and he said "well, I'll take that as a not guilty and see you in court.
Later I received a letter with notice of a trial date, and by registered mail I sent a copy of the citation I had sent in and the registered mail number to the court, along with an affidavit of status and a notice of fees for trespass of rights.
I went to court on the date, and when my name was called, I stood up and stated, "I am here by special appearance to settle this matter", with that the clerk ran out of the room, then came back a minute later. In the meantime, the prosecutor asked if I was NAME, and I didn't respond. The judge came in, called the court to order and read the case, and asked for my NAME. I stood and stated I was here by special appearance to settle this matter. She asked me to take a seat at the defense table, so I crossed the bar and did (potential mistake #1), she asked me to stand and make my plea, and I asked, "by what jurisdiction?"
She said, "Well you are Name?" And I said, "by what authority do you use that name for identification?" "Well, you are here for this compliant, right?" I asked "by what authority do you use that name for identification, I checked with the Department of Vital Records, and they clearly state one may not use this for identification purposes. She paused, the clerk handed her some papers, and she looked up and asked, "You send some paperwork to the court?" "Yes" "And this is signed by you, Firstname Surname?" I replied "Yes, as a man". She looked over to the prosecutor and said, "We shall proceed". (second mistake, agreeing I was "you"?).
They ran through the theater of getting the officer to testify and point me out, I didn't defend, and at the end the prosecutor asked the judge to double the fine and suspend my license for my behavior today in court, to teach me a lesson. She issued a guilty verdict and the original $330 fine plus $100 court fee and suspended my license for 30 days. I asked if she was administrating my trust without my consent, and she replied, "I don't need it." I told her I run a business, and this sentence was an unnecessary hardship, and she said her judgement was final, and to pay the charge at the window.
I would have loved to use my notice of trespass fees against them, but didn't know who or how to file such a compliant.
On a more recent speeding ticket (49 in a 35, downhill, speed trap set-up right at the sign where the limit changes from 50 to 35). I sent the same "No contract" citation back, but when I got the court notice, I just paid the $190 fine, as my time was too valuable to spend another day in court.
I suppose this is how they beat us into submission. My focus now is the "income" tax, which adds up to a lot more.
Note.
The phrase "sovereign citizen' is taken from and defined by the President of the United States.
See: 54 Stat 178, Ch. 183. germane to H. J. Res 437 [Pub Res. No. 67], May 3rd, 1940.
Hopefully, this assist to clarify how government agencies define the term 'sovereign citizen' by Presidential Proclamation.
Be wise, safe & blessed,
Arthur
Can you point to the exact location in the referenced document where you found the term "sovereign citizen"?
https://maint.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/76th-congress/session-3/c76s3ch184.pdf
Thank you Julie. This is great as it defines a "sovereign citizen" within the context of a "citizen of the United States", which is clearly defined in the Slaughter-House Cases. Which is a 14th Amendment citizen. It is a perfect circular trap. It has NOTHING to do with a man or a woman. And, this can be referenced in court or rebuttal documents asking them to define and what is different in this "definition" ["actually a resolution with a reference to something defined within the terms of something else"]. If you have rebutted the presumption and noticed of standing, it is demonstrably true that exercising your rights, this definition does not remotely apply to you. Only applies to the fictitious entity/resident/citizen of the United States/person. Notice the age reference? This also ties to selective service. This proves that they can only be talking about citizens of the United States when using "sovereign citizen" language. This is fantastic proof.
Thank you for your time to share your labor on the field of honor, in service of honor above all else, eternal forevermore.
Arthur