Soooo, I checked out the link at the bottom of your article. I started reading and was mildly amused, .... but after the pop-up appeared, I got done reading that and was supremely amused. Wondered "Okay, where do I sign up?" and I didn't even care what the information might be !! lmao
Although it is a bit crass and in your face, it is full of valuable and useful insight that will assist anyone to remove themselves from the matrix. Brandon does not quite cover everything, but it is fairly darn close. And, it is free. As it should be. His antics can be much for those with sensitive ears. But, i truly appreciate the honesty and he is spot on with references much like i provide. I am tired of people who pontificate without references and expect everyone to wake up based on grand verbosity. Sometimes, people simply need a little nudge in the right direction. Brandon does that wonderfully.
Yes, I figured further reading would get to the good info, I just really enjoyed the initial plunge. I rather like sarcasm and irony and such, so any crassness was more a bonus for me. I was just taking a peek for the moment and will definitely go back and saved the link in my Shire file and also saved a shortcut in the browser. Should be very interesting, as well as entertaining.
Shire, a few years ago i found historical documents that show the US began paying the BT States for each birth certificate of a black baby. Those were the birth certificate bonds which they then expanded to everyone else.
That is the 14th amendment and the origins of the special class of citizens as "citizen of the United States". These are "employees" of the federal government. Unless a man or woman corrects their status as a non-citizen national (naturalized) to some other Nation, then the presentation is you are this BC citizen of the United States.
I have been looking for that document i read years ago about thr North certificate bond. It was an actual post civil war government document that stated the federal government paid the States for each black baby born. Have you come across similar documents? If yes, can you share with me please.
I have not come across the documents you are referencing, but that was the premise that then spring boarded the plan by the AMA supported by congress to "improve" fetal birth rates. I covered this in a previous post including the actual health documents. The tricks always seem to come down to "safety" via "health" legislation. Here is the previous link. https://shirenews.substack.com/p/strawman-just-another-fake-thing
Shire, it appears the accepted and discharge method does not work with companies that do not have a TT&L account. Servicers for example do mpt have it and cannot cash. I have been told thet need a special license to process securities . Which means they are not sending BOE every month because they cannot be negotiated.
Discharge is an operation of law regardless of accounts or special licenses. This is based on currency - or more specifically, "negotiable instruments". The rules are the same for ALL negotiable instruments. And guess what? Every contract, be it a operating agreement, court documents, FRN, sales agreement, etc... are ALL negotiable instruments. Hence, UCC and 15 USC and Bill of Exchange Act applies. The other stuff is simply noise.
Have you seen this part of Black's Law definition of Discharge - "Discharge by operation of law is where the discharge takes place, whether it was intended by the parties or not; thus, if a creditor appoints his debtor his executor, the debt is discharged by operation of law, because the executor cannot have an action against himself.
I have read these, yes. The problem resides with the payor/executor in the case of the bill of exchange. They do not want to about to the fraud, so it usually needs to go to litigation to get them to execute per the law.
I read it as being the executor cannot be the debtor (payor) and that the executor should be in the creditor column. However, Trusts are very muddled as to word use, probably because they are foundational to the system.
And you can actually say there is three trust relationships with the seller trusting the bank to pay them.
A fourth trust relationship is attempted to be created by the bank with the bills of exchange. Getting the principle/grantor to pay twice. Once from credit (original collateral security) and again by your labor.
What gives value to the collateral security? Is it our gold and Silver on deposit with the Central Banks? I have read the BOE interantional treaty and the BOA Act and i cannot understand how a piece of paper could be used to pay if it is not drawn from a Bank account that is funded with Fiat Currency. I don't get it. Cam you expand on how the BOE is supposed to work as it was first intended when there was in fact money in circulation?
You are what gives the collateral security value. The value of your labor over time. This credit was established upon birth. You are the collateral and you give permission to access your credit with these blank indorsements.
The Bill of Exchange Act came out of England and was a way to accept paper in the form of a Bill and circulate to discharge debt. It was for commodities, gold, silver, or anything perceived as value.
So, there are two trust relationships going on in a credit application situation with the use of a collateral agreement.
First - your name game trust relationship. JOHN MICHAEL DOE (principle or grantor of the access to the credit trust), the agent John Michael Doe signing authority, and John Doe the beneficiary of the name game trust.
Second - dealer as seller and agent in the first for selling the car who then switches to benefiting from the sale - bank as payor who is the trustee to get the currency and pay the seller - JOHN MICHAEL DOE as the grantor giving permission to access the trust to get the credit - you use your agent to execute the agreement since the ALL CAPS NAME is not real in the tangible sense.
When the bank sends you bills, they are soliciting a payout trying to get overpayment based on misrepresenting the original collateral security. That is why it is a bill of exchange now with each statement. So, you as the agent assign the bank as the debtor to discharge on behalf of the grantor ALL CAPS NAME.
Soooo, I checked out the link at the bottom of your article. I started reading and was mildly amused, .... but after the pop-up appeared, I got done reading that and was supremely amused. Wondered "Okay, where do I sign up?" and I didn't even care what the information might be !! lmao
Although it is a bit crass and in your face, it is full of valuable and useful insight that will assist anyone to remove themselves from the matrix. Brandon does not quite cover everything, but it is fairly darn close. And, it is free. As it should be. His antics can be much for those with sensitive ears. But, i truly appreciate the honesty and he is spot on with references much like i provide. I am tired of people who pontificate without references and expect everyone to wake up based on grand verbosity. Sometimes, people simply need a little nudge in the right direction. Brandon does that wonderfully.
Yes, I figured further reading would get to the good info, I just really enjoyed the initial plunge. I rather like sarcasm and irony and such, so any crassness was more a bonus for me. I was just taking a peek for the moment and will definitely go back and saved the link in my Shire file and also saved a shortcut in the browser. Should be very interesting, as well as entertaining.
Shire, a few years ago i found historical documents that show the US began paying the BT States for each birth certificate of a black baby. Those were the birth certificate bonds which they then expanded to everyone else.
That is the 14th amendment and the origins of the special class of citizens as "citizen of the United States". These are "employees" of the federal government. Unless a man or woman corrects their status as a non-citizen national (naturalized) to some other Nation, then the presentation is you are this BC citizen of the United States.
I have been looking for that document i read years ago about thr North certificate bond. It was an actual post civil war government document that stated the federal government paid the States for each black baby born. Have you come across similar documents? If yes, can you share with me please.
I have not come across the documents you are referencing, but that was the premise that then spring boarded the plan by the AMA supported by congress to "improve" fetal birth rates. I covered this in a previous post including the actual health documents. The tricks always seem to come down to "safety" via "health" legislation. Here is the previous link. https://shirenews.substack.com/p/strawman-just-another-fake-thing
Shire, it appears the accepted and discharge method does not work with companies that do not have a TT&L account. Servicers for example do mpt have it and cannot cash. I have been told thet need a special license to process securities . Which means they are not sending BOE every month because they cannot be negotiated.
Discharge is an operation of law regardless of accounts or special licenses. This is based on currency - or more specifically, "negotiable instruments". The rules are the same for ALL negotiable instruments. And guess what? Every contract, be it a operating agreement, court documents, FRN, sales agreement, etc... are ALL negotiable instruments. Hence, UCC and 15 USC and Bill of Exchange Act applies. The other stuff is simply noise.
Great article. Thanks Sir Shire.
Have you seen this part of Black's Law definition of Discharge - "Discharge by operation of law is where the discharge takes place, whether it was intended by the parties or not; thus, if a creditor appoints his debtor his executor, the debt is discharged by operation of law, because the executor cannot have an action against himself.
Co. Litt. 264B, note 1; Williams Ex’rs, 1216; Chit. Cont. 714."
And "Holder in due course" is someone who is entitled to receive payment for a bill.
Black's Law again.
It also refers to an inheritance. "in due course" refers to time and especially for an arrival for a vessel's destination at journey's end.
I have read these, yes. The problem resides with the payor/executor in the case of the bill of exchange. They do not want to about to the fraud, so it usually needs to go to litigation to get them to execute per the law.
I read it as being the executor cannot be the debtor (payor) and that the executor should be in the creditor column. However, Trusts are very muddled as to word use, probably because they are foundational to the system.
And you can actually say there is three trust relationships with the seller trusting the bank to pay them.
A fourth trust relationship is attempted to be created by the bank with the bills of exchange. Getting the principle/grantor to pay twice. Once from credit (original collateral security) and again by your labor.
It is a layered scheme.
What gives value to the collateral security? Is it our gold and Silver on deposit with the Central Banks? I have read the BOE interantional treaty and the BOA Act and i cannot understand how a piece of paper could be used to pay if it is not drawn from a Bank account that is funded with Fiat Currency. I don't get it. Cam you expand on how the BOE is supposed to work as it was first intended when there was in fact money in circulation?
You are what gives the collateral security value. The value of your labor over time. This credit was established upon birth. You are the collateral and you give permission to access your credit with these blank indorsements.
The Bill of Exchange Act came out of England and was a way to accept paper in the form of a Bill and circulate to discharge debt. It was for commodities, gold, silver, or anything perceived as value.
So, there are two trust relationships going on in a credit application situation with the use of a collateral agreement.
First - your name game trust relationship. JOHN MICHAEL DOE (principle or grantor of the access to the credit trust), the agent John Michael Doe signing authority, and John Doe the beneficiary of the name game trust.
Second - dealer as seller and agent in the first for selling the car who then switches to benefiting from the sale - bank as payor who is the trustee to get the currency and pay the seller - JOHN MICHAEL DOE as the grantor giving permission to access the trust to get the credit - you use your agent to execute the agreement since the ALL CAPS NAME is not real in the tangible sense.
When the bank sends you bills, they are soliciting a payout trying to get overpayment based on misrepresenting the original collateral security. That is why it is a bill of exchange now with each statement. So, you as the agent assign the bank as the debtor to discharge on behalf of the grantor ALL CAPS NAME.