Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eleanor Stanford's avatar

Brandon is really amazing. His promo is quite shocking, but when he actually gets into the nitty-gritty of the topic, he’s very professional and knowledgeable.

Expand full comment
MX's avatar
Nov 5Edited

There is some confusing and misleading data in this post -

Either your intentionally misleading the American people (I hope not) or you just haven’t truly verified the facts and details of the definitions, per the link provided showing copper moonshine - who‼️ should know better (intended for copper moonshine- people should be double checking his data). So people can and should do their own research and verification for the true verifiable documented facts.

In your explanation you shared incomplete misinfo and misleading data possibly for the intention to keep people chasing their tails and distracted and working on finding the truth and facts or maybe just not verified completely.

I just hope people do their own research and verify factual data and continue to search for factual data.

👇🏻👇🏻

This is what you posted which is completely misleading and incomplete

“ PROTECTED CITIZENS

In the definitions 8 U.S. Code § 1101 – Definitions

(22)The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.

So, “citizen of a state” = “national of the United States” = “foreign official”.

Let’s verify the data-

Lower case state and capital State are different definitions as is Citizen and citizen.

Per legal and lawful meanings and definitions.

Found in Travel.state.gov

Per INA definitions

This is the complete post:

As defined by the INA, all U.S. citizens are U.S. nationals but only relatively small number of persons acquire U.S. nationality without becoming U.S. citizens.

Section 101(a)(21) of the INA defines the term "national" as "a person owing permanent allegiance to a state." Section 101(a)(22) of the INA provides that the term "national of the United States" includes all U.S. citizens as well as persons who, though not citizens of the United States, owe permanent allegiance to the United States (non-citizen nationals).

If you truly pay Attn you can see the difference.

One is a national (21) of USA under Gods Law Natural law in (s)tate

Vs

the United States Citizen & United States national (22) have Allegiance to the United States (American Samoan non-citizen national)

Why does it say US Citizen and US national in (22)- did you notice that they both have allegiance to United States (corp)

The national definition (21) has no allegiance to the United States Corp-

Take a look at verify legal definition of (s)tate to comprehend the difference. USC (uscode.house.gov)

title 8 1101 (21) national (under Gods Law) & (22) US national (American Samoan) (allegiance to United States corp)

And why was this case removed from copper moonshines website?

"Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability."

- U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).

👆🏻👆🏻This case proves there is a federal citizen/United States citizen and US National due their territory being owned by US- owe allegiance to United States.

As a national of USA is completely different from U.S.

https://www.govregs.com/uscode/expand/title28_partVI_chapter176_subchapterA_section3002

15(a)

Always verify the data

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts