25 Comments

The good ole re con struct ion act.

Expand full comment

This one will stand with status quo anti-bellum!

Expand full comment
author

Novation Prior to the Civil War.

Expand full comment

The burden of proof is theirs they have fiction world jurisdiction. If they continue, it's undue influence. Fertilization is status quo anti bellum - the situation existing before the war.

Expand full comment
author

Know thine enemy. For it knows it's prey. Yet it cannot consume all the souls, and still devises means to deceive. Being out of the race does not remove the risks of the winner who works harder than the rest. Proof is irrelevant. It comes down to will and novation of fraudulent contracts. What did you ever agree to? Ever? That is where the hooks hide in waiting. Even if you did not think you consented...

Expand full comment

It's called an impossible contract.

Expand full comment
author

Also adhesion contact.

Expand full comment

Yup don't make a claim in the fictional world as it's there busy ness.

Expand full comment

It's their franchise business no of mine.

Expand full comment
author

The only thing of yours is what you claim. So correct, if left to them to control.

Expand full comment

It's their composition of matter how can One claim it? Besides, you would be admitting to the fiction for the insane.

Expand full comment
author

Think about the irony. Admitting to the fiction, yet the fiction is not real by definition. So, admitting to nothing real. Self fulfilling circuitous admission to a claim that is non existent. Like a negotiable instrument based on the credit of the labor of mankind.

Expand full comment

I read around half the article so far. The chatGPT agrees that state is a mental construct, which means not real. I am just curious as to how it reconcile territory, laws of state. Are we to take that these things are real? Citizens, persons are all defined in laws of the state. It is really difficult to make sense of what it all.

Expand full comment
author
Sep 19·edited Sep 19Author

Keep reading. State of State organizations are franchise corporations of the federal government. Here is an example from D&B https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.commonwealth_of_pennsylvania.fa44b71cb5cfeac46b974bacac7f5a56.html

Every State of State or County of X organization (meaning State of California or Commonwealth of Virginia - same is true for County of X naming convention) is a franchise of the federal government. In descending order. The States are in on it.

Here is an example from West Virginia: §17-1-18. ""State. "State" shall mean the State of West Virginia, unless by the context some other state or territory or federal district of the United States is meant or intended."

To clear up the run on sentence, take out the options and read it as ""State" shall mean the State of West Virginia, unless by context some other federal district of the United States."

They are telling you "State of West Virginia" is a federal district of the United States. So, if you go back to the definition of "United States" in 8 USC § 1101(a)(38) - Definitions, and look up "United States", it clearly reads "(38) The term “United States”, except as otherwise specifically herein provided, when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands."

This is for determining nationality/naturalization (where you decide where you belong). They do this here to open up the options of deciding to become a "citizen of the United States" OR other nationality. So, you need to dig deeper into the word "State" as you point out. 8 USC § 1101(a)(36) defines "State" as the following: "(36) The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands."

If you read the article in its entirety, you will see that all the codes ONLY can be consistently applied if you look at United States and State as fictitious entities and all all CAPS names as an ens legis (creation of the mind only).

Now ask yourself, are you a creation of the mind? A creature of the law? When you understand this difference, you will stop giving blank indorsements to their contracts that enslave you into being a "citizen" of a State or the United States.

The State of State organizations and the County of organizations, and the federal United States are all fictitious entities as corporate body politic - or a form of ens legis. Just like your all CAPS name.

Hope this helps.

Expand full comment
Sep 19Liked by Shire Herald

I have been aware of this for nearly 2 decades. I had a dun&bradstreet account and I looked up everything U.S. senate, State senate, municipalities, police departments all private corporations. I said it private. They have commoditized all of their citizens for profit

Public cannot be incorporated. Public is that which is set aside for the enjoyment of everyone. That is, whatever is public cannot be property. All so called public corporations are deceptions.

Expand full comment
author

Just as a curiosity... Have you ever considered being the attorney in fact for your ens legis and turning the tables as appropriate? And, have you removed all your contacts with the federal infant? Sent novation or write off praecipe for any marriage license, revoked voting registration, revoked election to pay taxes, novation for certificate of title to automobiles, turned on and rejected the revocable trust for drivers license and plates and title, non citizen national passport, get diplomatic plates through private motor carrier method, record rejection of power of attorney to social security administration, taken on your own durable power of attorney, etc...?

Expand full comment

The answer to these questions is, mostly no. I find it very difficult to interface with the people that administer these affairs. From experience I find that they are mostly unscrupulous, so I avoid contact as much as possible. I avoid indulging in behaviors and activities that might place me within their jurisdiction; e.g. I don't fill forms attach my signature to any of their documents. All documents that I previously held have expired. I have not given notice to any so-called officials. My reason for not doing so is I do not have the need to petition strangers. I think it is pointless. If I do not give my consent to be in their jurisdiction I think that is sufficient. Everything that I have invested in the illusion I am willing to forfeit.

As for the courts I do not visit voluntarily. I have no need or desire to bring any suit against my fellow man so I have decided that if I am ever present in any court it will be against my will.

Expand full comment
author

Respectfully... Fair enough. I, on the other hand, wish to bring the lie to light. Sitting in the dark in silence has not brought the world to a better place. I do not see the energetic karma in the allowing others to be blindly led into the abyss while others watch them go and has the knowledge or ability to stand. So, there are some who choose to engage, if for nothing more, than to help a precious few. It's not about me... It's about you. Blessings.

Expand full comment

I commend what you are doing. It’s obvious that you are quite motivated and I know that you are having an impact. Therefore, I think that the work that you do is necessary. For what it’s worth you have my encouragement.

Expand full comment

Rights come from lowercase federal in which is God’s covenant with man none of this federal citizenship. Citizen ship means subject look it up for yourselves! You are being had with spells wake up! Citizenship is their construct or idea having nothing to do with the laws of nature!

Expand full comment
author

As a clarification, it is up to you naturalize to wherever you want. No citizenship. That comes with duties and responsibilities. Rights are expressed. They are anything you want in this world as long as it causes no harm to another of mankind. Not sure where or who the "you" is being directed. Not sure what "you" is the reference to "being had". But, I really do not care since it seems the point was missed in the post "discussion". Citizens are an ens legis. Creature of law. A creation of the mind on paper. Being a citizen was not the point of the article. It was a clear demonstration that you are not. All federal laws are related to fictitious things, simply referred to as an ens legis.

Expand full comment

Yup lowercase federal is God's covenant with man and not their legal fiction. What is the point? Where it (the biology/fallen angel) presumeably fell in the delivery room. The creature of law is the "goods"/unborn of animals.

Expand full comment
author

The placenta scam

Expand full comment

What is the placenta scam

Expand full comment
author

Creature of law is the birth sack - placenta that is "birthed" from the "inland waterway" as a vessel of the woman that is then "dead, lost at sea" and is assigned a different registration date, and becomes the ens legis all CAPS fictitious entity ward of the state. And if you do not claim it, it is presumed to have left it's estate to the "government".

Expand full comment