Bondage - Strawman Part III

Explanation on being a slave and how it is all about securities and bonds - currency to fuel an empire

The Fall of Babylon, mezzotint by John Martin, 1831

Preamble

The “civil war” series is coming, however, it is important to take a step back and help tie some loose ends together. This will not be complete by any means. The only way to understand your world is to realize how you are perceived by the government, the lawyers, the judges, the merchants, the controllers of the world; and, then see the system of evil that entraps and uses us as negotiable instruments in the form of bonds and fictitious debtors.

There have been ongoing questions about the system and how it works related to the “Strawman”; or paper-person. As a reminder, in the system, it is all about paper and your future value of work. It is also under the control of Admiralty and Municipal jurisdictions.

It is important to go out of historical order a little bit to set the baseline so people can understand what the commercial mercenary conflict of 1861 [“aka - later named the civil war”] was about and how it set the stage for America’s rise to monetary influence and a world power through the hypothecation of people and their assets.

We all (or most) tend to think that the tax system and STATE-OF-STATE’s [“STATE OF WASHINGTON for example”] legal codes, rules, acts, and statutes; as well as the U.S. Government’s federal legal codes, rules, acts, and statutes are for people. They are not. They are for “residents”, “persons”, “individuals”, “corporations” in their various forms and spin offs, “subjects”, and those in bondage as debtors through the birth certificate and social security number.

• On Jurisdictions: Who and Where are You?

We can operate in various jurisdictions depending on knowing who we are at any point in time. Wouldn’t you like to be in control of that situation?

Slaves and Souls of Men

When walking into a court room, the presumption is that you are a subject or debtor in the form of a slave who is already guilty.

How is that possible? What about the Constitution?

Conversion has happened. This conversion happened in admiralty law and enforced in MUNICIPAL courts through “equity law”. Of course, equity is an intentional misnomer.

• "Strawman" - Just another fake thing?

When the birth certificate was created upon birth, you became a debtor that is presumed dead-lost-at-sea. Your work as a slave is traded through the bond number on the certificate based on your value over time.

The voter registration process also sets up paper evidence of being a U.S. Citizen or citizen. This action places you in the jurisdiction of the federal government, and thus, in admiralty law since international commerce, military, and treaties all fall in admiralty/maritime jurisdiction as outlined in the Constitution’s enumerated duties.

From Revelation:

¹¹ And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more: ¹² the merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble, ¹³ and cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.

Revelation: 11-13

Why would this state “souls of men” as merchandise? That would indicate the souls of men are owned by merchants and traded.

If one were to look at the Bible as more of a guidebook of the story of man and how evil took control, and then stepped back and understood where we are today, one might think it was an instruction manual. Not necessarily an instruction manual for loving people, but for the evil of this world. The same may be said for certain calendars and “holy days”. Why do bad things happen on so many “holy days”? This is evidenced in much of the work by Johnathan Cahn. Curios…

This is not to be a dissertation on the Bible. The Bible is incomplete, poorly translated [“various definitions of “God”, “god”, “God Most High”, “Lord”, etc… - Look up the definitions and origins of each in Hebrew and Greek, they are all a little different - wasn’t the Origin of the universe by One?”] and of the hundreds of ancient books through the history of the world, the Bible only contains an intentionally narrowed set of books chosen in the 3rd century AD and modified over time. The same is true for other religions and their holy books/codex’s.

If you believe these things are not connected - the only disillusion is yours to contend with rectifying.

You will find conflicting accounts of the use of the birth certificate online. Some postings clearly confirm the use of the BC as a bond instrument. Other postings state it is a conspiracy theory or falsely propagated lie.

Simple logic experiment - if the definitions of words have any value and meaning in all the Law and law and legal dictionaries, then the ALL CAPS name “person” is a slave and debtor as shown in previous articles. That is the presumption when you walk into the court room unless you revoke the presumption immediately. So, do you believe the commentator attempting to debunk or do you believe the definitions have weight that defines the rules?

Have you or anyone you have known been treated as guilty upon walking in the court room?… even though no harm has befallen another of mankind by the hand of that presumed guilty man?

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and talks like a duck… yet, those who write that the BC as a bond is a conspiracy theory, basically saying the duck is an elephant. That makes sense!

Oh, and FDR and the congressional record stated exactly that the people and Nation and assets would be a mortgage back in 1933:

1933 March 9, a bank emergency was declared by President Roosevelt because of the insolvency [bankruptcy] of the United States. Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594, 1973.

1933 March 9, “The new money is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st Session.

So, what is the point?

Your Birth Certificate [“BC”] is a bond that is traded based on the “homes and other property of all the people in the Nation”. The Social Security number is a trust account for deposits based on your work categorized as a “job” with “income”.

They (federal government) told the world they were going to do it in 1933, and they did; they created a method to monetize people and their assets by utilizing the 14th Amendment after the “civil war” and converting people to U.S. citizens through the BC and then voter registration - hence, creating a “legal fiction”; setup a securities system to track and make it “legal”; set up a depository account through an unlawful agency [“not created by Congress”] eventually called IRS and various other versions with the use of the SS#; gave banks and corporations permission to create currency based on the hypothetical value of people and their assets; never balance the books on the credit side because the method of remedy is regularly updated through statutes to change the rules when enough people start to figure out the remedy; and the presumption that each of mankind is actually a legal “person” because all this paperwork is prima fascia evidence that is true…

Oh yeah, and the legal society and bankers “steals” the credit when we unwittingly give them permission to do so…

It is fairly straight forward if you care enough to look and read the actual definitions and laws. And know when you are regarded as a fictitious paper thing in the land of the dead, and when you are not.

A Social Security number (SSN) is a numerical identifier assigned to U.S. citizens and some residents to track their income and determine benefits.

Kagan, J. (n.d.). What is a SSN? facts to know about social security numbers. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/ssn.asp

Notice how it is assigned to “U.S. citizens” and some “residents”? What if you were a Citizen of a State or State National? Do you need a SS#? Based on the definition, nope! It is also a felony to compel someone to provide their SS#. See… 42 USC 408 A-8. Yet, the Post Master is trained to require the SS# for the Passport application. It is their training. And they have no idea they are committing a felony. If you were to take them to court, the court immediately presumes you are a slave in bondage and have no rights, and must do the paperwork as commanded. As a result, you have no rights and it is presumed you actually permitted the crime upon your “person”.

It is a circular system designed to entrap and confuse with words and presumptions.

Meat and Potatoes

So, knowing you are a slave and that your work is ‘demoted’ to a job, and its value is traded on the open market as well as all the assets of property in the Nation, how would that work?

It is a monetary securities scheme.

You need to ask yourself the following questions:

What is a security?

What is an instrument?

What is the drawer?

What is the maker?

What is performance?

What is an issuer?

What is a holder in due course?

What is a surety bond?

What is recoupment?

What is a trust?

What is a trustee?

What is a Grantor?

What is a beneficiary?

What is a plaintiff?

What is a defendant?

What is a surety?

What is OID [“Original Issue Discount Debt”]?

What is a guarantor?

What is an estate?

What is a trust indenture?

What is an indictment security?

What is a case [“versus a claim”]?

What is credit?

What is equity?

What is authorization?

After researching and understanding these terms, then the idea of you [“as your NAME”] as a paper thing that is traded around will start to make sense. You [“as your NAME”] have been unlawfully converted to a security without your full knowledge. However, it is presumed that you [“the living soul”] know the law and the trading of securities in commerce which is part of the enumerated duties of the federal government. And, you [“as the signatory NAME defendant”] are presumed to be the trustee who is obligated to pay the interest and manage the security. And, you [“the NAME dead-entity slave”] are presumed to be the debtor as the paper Strawman slave.

All because of agreements you [“as the signatory NAME defendant”] signed without full disclosure.

What happens

Did you know the court makes money on you every time you “appear” in court [“a ghost or magic trick is to appear”]? This is above and beyond your debt to the lawyer.

When you go into court and answer “Yes” to the question if you are your Strawman ALL CAPS name, they are opening access to the credit against your bond [“through the certified Birth Certificate”] and the trust account by the use of the SSN which opens said Trust account and allows open access.

How?

The filing of a case number is a NEW BOND!

They are creating a trust agreement with them presuming to be beneficiaries once you give access to the BC bond and direct access to the special deposit account.

It’s a Futures Game

The act of filing a case allows a bond to be created. However; to get permission to access your account, they need you to “appear” and say “Yes” to your NAME.

How do they get you to appear?

They issue a warrant or a summons in the ALL CAPS name [“unlawful conveyance of names and/or language through the postal service in violation of 18 USC 1001, 1341, and 1342”]. It is a bet against you performing in the future that they can then capitalize upon that bet. Legalized gambling. Scare you enough into complying.

“Performance” in the trust world is done by the trustee. So, they want your Strawman to become the trustee when you say “Yes”. They are creating an oral trust contract. That is why they need you in “person” to comply. Thus compelling you to perform as trustee with you saying “yes”.

The real goal is to make money off your credit. They need a surety.

What Is a Surety?

A surety is a promise or agreement made by one party that debts and financial obligations will be paid.

Kenton, W. (n.d.). Surety: Definition, how it works with bonds, and distinctions. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/surety.asp

When you say “Yes” to your NAME, you become the surety and trustee and debtor all in one. The case number can now be a clearing house for the dividends made off said case bond.

This is all because the prima fascia evidence indicates you are already a slave and have no rights. The evidence that you ARE your NAME. And now you just admitted it! Voluntarily!

This is why it is so important to understand you are NOT your name. It is simply a reference. It was given and you claimed it… the NAME is not you!

Your NAME falls under a different jurisdiction than mankind. Fictions live with the dead and cannot do business with the living.

What happens next?

Hypothetical situation, of course…

What if you did not show up to the court room? Or better yet, you call them out on their fraud and violation of 18 USC 1341 and 1342?

Since this is a futures gamble, they basically opened a case and issued worthless securities against the gamble that you would answer the summons, you would show up, AND you would say you are your NAME. They did this without an underwriter!

What does that create? Securities fraud! They are now on the hook for the worthless security. Add to this deceit, that none of the lawyers, judges, or clerks report receipt of their extortion fee as they are supposed to as a law-abiding U.S. citizen.

In addition to the securities fraud, the clerk or prothonotary, the judge, the lawyers all just engaged in conspiracy to obstruct US tax laws [“remember, they are U.S. citizens and also subject to the tax laws”] because they're liable for the taxes.

If you did not consent to their presumption things get ugly. They had no intention of reporting the gain [“the OID value of the bond”].

How do we know this to be true? The court does not report any of the case bonds as income. This is because they consider them to be original issues. Original Issues are non-taxable under the Securities Act of 1933.

The court has already presumed they are the beneficiaries of the potentially worthless security they opened. They also presumed you are the trustee and must perform.

The act of signing the case performance bond as the defendant makes you now the underwriter by way of the Strawman performing against the cestui que trust - the Estate.

• "Origins" of the hypothecation - STRAWMAN Part II

By signing that case performance bond as the “defendant” [“that new case number they created”] you have successfully unwritten their gamble. Now the judge and the lawyers, and the plaintiff are off the hook and can make money.

DE-FEND-ANT

“DE” = NO

“FEND” = Effort to resist

“ANT” = answer-less

You just signed agreement that you will not give any effort to resist and you have no answers. But, you must perform as the trustee since you are a slave and agreed to that presumption.

What happens if you do not accept?

Re-issue - Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - NOT TAX EXEMPT

First a re-cap:

The lawyer, plaintiff, and judge conspire [“two or more persons enter into an agreement or contract to defraud”] to issue a bond based on a gamble that you will agree to being a trustee and give up your credit and cover all costs as a trustee of whatever that bond results.

But, you say NO and you are aware that you are NOT your NAME. You call them out and do not “appear”, but instead have a “special visitation” from behind the BAR line in the gallery. You ask some simple questions and clarify you are simply a man or woman and are only here on “special visitation”, and you do not understand what they are talking about. A name is just a name. It is a piece of paper. It is a reference. You ask if there is a bond opened against a name you already claim? Was it a bond that was opened without your permission? Is the case number a performance bond? Basically, a contract just like a general contractor enters an agreement to perform under the terms of the contract. Who issued it?

No one in front of you is entitled to use that name without your permission. Tell the judge he needs to find out as the trustee since it is a bond issued under his watch. You just appointed him to perform as trustee. After all the judge is to have and comply with the following 5 things:

• Commission of Office

• Oath of Office

• Public Bond [“The Bond Against His Performance”]

• Letter of Marque

• Delegation of Authority Letter

But, let’s say all you understand is you are not your NAME…

You only say “NO” to the question “is the NAME is you?” Then a re-issue occurs. They must make sure they succeed in the payout of their bet on that futures security bond they all were complicit in issuing.

Since the case bond did not work by itself, they re-issue against your Estate. You know, the one that was created at birth that was issued [“by the issuer”] at birth [“or within 10 days to 2 weeks after birth”] by the Treasury and traded for currency [“IOU - FRN”] with the Fed after you were born. How do you think they originally printed money? The bond you never went back to claim as your control… how could you, you were never told you were presumed dead-lost-at-sea; and, that you were a ward of the STATE government since no one claimed you within the first 7 years; and then a federal citizen [“fictitious entity”] after 25 years, voter registration, selective service, etc…; and you had long term futures value based on your labor as that fictitious entity; and, you had an Estate in trust that the government presumes to be the beneficiary if left unclaimed. Wonder why they want the young to go off and die in war? Who collects on the equitable Estate bond?

If upon re-issue [“and they may try to use your Name like John Doe or John DOE to try to trick you”] you are on to their game, and you do not volunteer to be a “defendant” with an attorney who is in on the game, they are now in trouble.

Why?

A bond was issued based on a bet you would underwrite that bond. Now they are going after the Estate, and you still say NO. AND, you tell them to perform against their own bond they created without your consent. Meaning you are now the beneficiary because,… well… they tried to steal the name you claim and are in control of, and they are committing TRESPASS ON THAT GOOD NAME! [“i bet you wondered where that phrase came from”] You have security interest in the name you claim.

This takes us all the way back to “titles”:

Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition

TITLE. The radical meaning of this word appears to be that of a mark, style, or designation; a distinctive appellation; the name by which anything is known. Thus, in the law of persons, a title is an appellation of dignity or distinction, a name denoting the social rank of the person bearing it; as "duke" or "count."

shem - an appellation, as a mark or memorial of individuality; by impl. honor, authority, character: - name, renown, fame, famous, named… Strong’s Concordance pg 283 Hebrew to English

Job 32:21-22

21 Let me not, I pray you, accept any man’s person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man. 22 For I know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away.

“Owner” - it is a word that invokes duties and responsibilities. It is a TITLE. An “owner” holds legal title. Would it not be better to be a man who sometimes owns things - or better yet, claims property? An “owner” is liable for performance including taxes, insurance, upkeep, etc... That makes the owner the trustee by definition. It is synonymous with resident when used in context of the tenant who has “right” to use. As counter intuitive as it may sound, you NEVER want to be the owner. You want to be a man who claims “property” and controls the property; the highest right a man or woman has is property.

All word tricks… Examples:

• “What do you want to BE when you grow up?”;

• “Let’s OWN a business!”;

• “I want to be an OWNER".”

What if you did not own anything, but you controlled everything? What if you controlled property? It is a claim, but not something you owned…

Think trusts. This is how the BC and SSN works and why you should control them, but not own them. By claiming your names and using them as proxy’s [“which you do already for credit cards, bank accounts, etc…”] you can control your assets. The difference is general deposit accounts versus special deposit accounts.

The Singularity

What if we are to benefit from this place; this temporary prison? Basically, we do not own this gift of creation and material existence. We are beneficial stewards of the gift instead. Beneficial stewards of the world at large. What has more control and power? The man who claims the benefits or the one who owns it and has to take care of it all? Own is a tricky word…

Are we the beneficiaries of this gift? Is it not better to be the one who benefits of earth and not be the trustee?

Keep in mind, we are talking about admiralty and MUNICIPAL jurisdiction.

What if the presumption was YOU are always the trustee and MUST perform? That means you are the slave to the beneficiary. You must pay their bills from your Estate.

Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition:

ACTIO IN REM. In the civil and common law. An action for a thing; an action for the recovery of a thing possessed by another, Inst 4, C, 1. An action for the enforcement of a right (or for redress for its invasion) which was originally available against all the world, and not in any special sense against the individual sued, until he violated it. See In Rem.

IN REM. A technical term used to designate proceedings or actions instituted against the thing, in contradistinction to personal actions, which are said to be in personam. See in personam.

IN PERSONAM, IN REM. In the Roman law, from which they are taken, the expressions "in rem" and "in personam" were always opposed to one another, an act or proceeding in personam being one done or directed against or with reference to a specific person, while an act or proceeding in rem was one done or directed with reference to no specific person, and consequently against or with reference to all whom it might concern, or "all the world." The phrases were especially applied to actions; an actio in personam being the remedy where a claim against a specific person arose out of an obligation, whether ex contractu or ex maleficio, while an action in rem was one brought for the assertion of a right of property, easement, status, etc., against one who denied or Infringed it. See Inst 4, 6, 1 ; Gaius, 4, 1, 1-10; 5 Sav. Syst. 13, et seq.; Dig. 2, 4, 7, 8; Id. 4, 2, 9, 1.

From this use of the terms, they have come to be applied to signify the antithesis of "available against a particular person," and "available against the world at large." Thus, jura in personam are rights primarily available against specific persons; jura in rem-, rights only available against the world at large.

COURT OF ADMIRALTY. A court having jurisdiction of causes arising under the rules of admiralty law. See Admiralty.

—High court of admiralty. In English law. This was a court which exercised jurisdiction in prize cases, and had general jurisdiction in maritime causes, on the instance side. Its proceedings were usually in rem, and its practice and principles derived in large measure from the civil law. The judicature acts of 1873 transferred all the powers and jurisdiction of this tribunal to the probate, divorce, and admiralty division of the high court of justice.

The logic applies to the securities as well. Someone issued the securities. However; you had to exist for the securities to be issued. The security is a bet on the future of your current existence. So, you are the beneficiary of the securities. It was the name you claimed after all that was used. You can also say you own the name, but that is simply the logical extension, as no one else would own it unless you let them. It is like saying you ARE the name and then the court presumes you are the trustee and they benefit since you must perform as the owner [“a title”]. If you were not born, no security would be created by the issuer.

A name is a title. Better to benefit from the “person” who is the title and must perform for you, the beneficiary. It is better to force performance on a trustee with you as the beneficiary, than be the owner with the presumption you are defaulting to the status of a trustee.

It is confusing at first, but once it clicks, you will be amazed!

The Estate

All roads lead to the Estate:

• The Estate is the Birth Certificate trust

• The Estate is the surety for the debt’s of the NAME or Strawman

• The Estate is the debtor on your security agreement in most (not all) cases

So, is it in rem through the public world at large that should control the trust setup with the issue of the BC bond? Or, should you control the Estate and pay up front utilizing that credit?

The public in rem is facilitated through the case bond. Through tricks like coercion, unlawful compelling, and presumption, the court [“world at large admiralty court - international - not land and soil”] summons the dead to court to trick you into being the dead… a piece of paper NAME or Name.

But, how did they believe that your house and “real property” had to be foreclosed upon in the first place? You paid all your bills. There is no more mortgage left.

Well… you believe you are a resident… a tenant… someone who has the “right” to be there, but not the “right” to control - necessarily. You probably attested to the same within the first couple months buying a home, or moving to a new house and/or State. You assumed, which allowed them to presume, you are a resident. You did not assume you were one of mankind claiming your rights as an American.

Keep in mind, this is security and tax law. 26 USC, 18 USC, 8 USC, and the list goes on for all the color-of-law presumptions through non-positive law statutes under admiralty law.

26 USC § 865(g)(1)

United States resident

(1) In general Except as otherwise provided in this subsection— (A) United States resident The term “United States resident” means— (i) any individual who— (I) is a United States citizen or a resident alien and does not have a tax home (as defined in section 911(d)(3) ) in a foreign country, or (II) is a nonresident alien and has a tax home (as so defined) in the United States, and (ii) any corporation, trust, or estate which is a United States person (as defined in section 7701(a)(30) ). (B) Nonresident The term “nonresident” means any person other than a United States resident.

Please note: this is all about persons and residents. It is lumped in with other fictitious entities in the definition above. Hence, the Maxim of Law for of like kinds applies. If you declare your residency, then that means you have just created a lien against your property to be secured by the Estate as a fictitious entity, and your property can be managed by the government. You no longer solely control your property. You get listed as the Owner on the tax roles, and thus must perform.

This is hidden from you since you are left alone until it is convenient to come collecting. An example is someone died who was declared a resident for the property. Time for Estate tax! So, taxes are due since you are a resident acting as a tenant, with a right to use, but not the man or woman living on the land who claims the property. Then - Surprise! Time to pay!

An Estate [“in this case an equitable estate”] almost always implies a tenant or trust relationship. This is not title in fee-simple, but title in fee or a lesser status. It is “right”, “title”, or “interest” in said property. But, not full control. See how tricky they are?

Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd Edition:

An equitable estate is an estate an interest in which can only be enforced in a court of chancery. Avery v. Dufrees, 9 Ohio, 145. That is properly an equitable estate or interest for which a court of equity affords the only remedy ; and of this nature, especially, is the benefit of every trust, express or implied, which is not converted into a legal estate by the statute of uses. The rest are equities of redemption, constructive trusts, and all equitable charges. Burt. Comp. c. 8. Brown v. Freed, 43 Ind. 253; In re Qunlifications of Electors, 19 R. I. 387, 35 Atl. 213.

So, an equitable estate is the benefit of every trust. Back to trusts and securities again.

Pledges

Up to this point, without your knowledge, you have been pledging your trust to anyone you sign your name to without specifying your rights and standing. Each time you sign anything in your name, the presumption is you are pledging your Estate to pay. At the same time, you are agreeing to pay for the same thing, with interest.

Remember, a trust was created with your ALL CAPS name with the BC. This set up the estate. Then a credit was placed in that trust. Every time you sign your name, you are giving permission for funds to be pulled from that trust in your NAME and the bank gets paid. Then the bank presumes you are a resident who needs to pay back the trust. The bank gives you a loan in the form of a mortgage and you as a resident are expected to pay it back with interest [“usury”]. The bank essentially gets paid twice. They never report the Estate credit payment.

Back to Court

The court is doing the same thing. They just created a security future in the form of a bond with the case number, sold it on the open market based on gaming the system, and are betting you say “Yes” so they get paid from the Estate.

Then you go through all the crap in court and you have to pay again from your own work and effort. You just paid out twice. Once from the Estate created at birth with an account held in trust with the IRS and Treasury department acting as the Trustee. Once again, out of pocket, for the trouble of being there and not having full disclosure.

All this time, the court was simply scaring you into paying them and you had no idea what was actually going on.

The court enforces the security interest [“see above equitable estate”] where a court of equity is the only remedy.

Tangent - why is “equity” used all the time now? Is it actually about equity or securities? Think about it…

The court creates a trust bond, scares you to accept paying that bond, and then extracts more from you to execute the court of equity. What a beautiful scheme!

Think About It

The federal U.S. government in 1933 acted on a scheme building upon the 14th amendment and the central bank IOU [“FRN scam”] to create an Estate trust in your ALL CAPS name. The guise was to use the credit of the Nation through peoples property and assets to pay the commercial bills and loans of the stacked up debt through their mismanagement of government while executing the enumerated duties.

The idea was sold that each man or woman had a value both in assets, property, and future production. Similar to the attempt as indentured servitude from the first colonists and the community production [“people caught on quick back then”].

So, a credit was established. Then debt was racked up on the other side of the ledger to pay for the governments bills and pad the pockets of the bankers. We were supposed to have a remedy to get our credit back and maintain our property.

Date 23-May-1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058) against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, conspiracy, fraud, unlawful conversion and treason. The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has yet to be acted on.

Date: 05-June-1933, to mitigate McFadden’s charges (and prevent being hanged for treason), Congress passed House Joint Resolution 192 to provide U. S. Citizens the right to set off all debt obligations as the consideration (something bargained for i.e., an exchange) for the transfer of all the gold and property. It is against Public Policy to pay a debt. Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112 in the United States Statutes at Large is Public Law.

After a long enough time, people forgot how the world worked before the turn of the 19th century. There were too many wars, a great depression, and a pandemic in 1918. By the time World War II came around, people were more about “patriotism” and not about watching their government mismanage their responsibilities. Sound familiar?

Under equality, which has led to equity [“all under securities futures since the civil war, in a continually tested and re-imagined form”] the world emotionally reacted to every media trumpeted problem. As an emotional response, we gave over more power to statutes and rules and codes. This was done through conversion, and then pledging our good NAME, and Name, and name.

Enough time has passed that we actually think we ARE the NAME. That makes it really easy to take our property, all by the trespass on our good NAME.

Summary

There is more to this story. There are ways to use your credit for your benefit. Especially at court. But, that is a much longer explanation. If you do not understand what has been explained to date, then none of the proper status [“standing”] at court and the access of the credit will make any sense.

The value is knowing who you are under the Origin of the universe. The power rests in every man and woman to control your Estate, and benefit from that control. After all, it is not about the money. It is about who controls you, your name, your assets, your trust, and your soul.

For anyone who believes this is a conspiracy theory [“which typically turn into conspiracy fact”], try explaining the condition of our courts, property, inflation, and the lack of the ability for the American family to get ahead. Please use legal definitions, codes, and actual facts that exist right in the laws today to support your debunking attempts. Have fun with it! Singularity is watching.

The Last Judgment is a fresco by Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni (1536–1541)